Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,677 results for subject:Enforcement

Subject X
Ministerial powers

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Ministerial powers (2,677)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords committee stage first day. Clauses 1 to 14 agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Leong
Answering member
Lord Hunt of Wirral; Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Scottish legislative consent granted. Northern Ireland and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 cc881-919
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Sharpe of Epsom

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 6, leave out “of or including” and insert “predominantly of”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment seeks to narrow the definition of a steel undertaking so that it had to be a business consisting predominantly of the manufacture or processing of steel, or...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 c881
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 1, in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Hunt of Wirral, is very simple. It seeks to confine the powers in this Bill to genuine steel businesses. Those are undertakings consisting predominantly of the manufacture or processing of steel—or iron for the purposes of...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 c881
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I fully support this amendment and hope that it will tease out from the Minister a little more about what the underlying purpose of the general legislation is, as I am not too enamoured of this becoming a fully nationalised industry with the ability to acquire all sorts...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 cc881-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister, his team, the department and the two experts who came all the way from Coventry in 35-degree temperatures to educate the noble Lord, Lord Hampton, and me on the technology of steel. It has been very co-operative and I thank them.

I am slightly confused...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 c882
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for their constructive engagement in advance of Committee, and for all the amendments and valuable contributions that they will make during it.

Amendment 1 in the names of the noble Lords, Lord Sharpe and Lord Hunt, seeks to introduce a narrow definition of a...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 cc882-3
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken. It was remiss of me not also to thank the Minister and his team for their extensive engagement on the Bill.

This amendment is simple. I am afraid that I do not agree with the Minister’s comments or those from the...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 cc883-4
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Hunt of Wirral

2: Clause 2, page 1, line 14, leave out “includes (but is not limited to)” and insert “means”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment seeks to limit the public interest test to the areas set out in subsections (a) to (c).

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 c884
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak to Amendments 2, 3 and 8.

Amendment 2 limits the public interest test to the specific factors listed in Clause 2. On first reading, the test looks robust: national security, the economy and

“the construction, maintenance and operation of critical infrastructure”.

These are serious criteria that one might think...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 cc884-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 2 would replace

“includes (but is not limited to)”

with the word “means” so that we knew what we were describing. The worry is that leaving it as it is could create a public interest so large that there was a mission creep that I do not think should...

Member
Lord Sentamu (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 c886
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome these three amendments. Amendment 2 is a necessary slight curtailment but would still leave the Government with enormous scope, given how wide-ranging the three cited reasons for public interest intervention are. Like my noble friend, I cannot think of any other reason why they might want...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 cc886-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, one of the things that the briefing from the high value catapult team confirmed is the enormous difficulty there will be in creating a viable business from what His Majesty’s Government intend to take control of in Scunthorpe. There is the age of its blast furnace, the potential...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 cc888-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lords, Lord Hunt, Lord Redwood and Lord Fox, and the noble and right reverend Lord, Lord Sentamu, for their contributions to this group. There are several amendments to the articulation of the public interest test in Clause 2. This is a key clause in...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 cc889-890
House
House of Lords

My amendment?

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 c890
House
House of Lords

I am referring to the noble Lord’s later amendment.

I fully agree with the principle that taxpayers’ money must be spent wisely. Any decision to bring a steel undertaking into public ownership would be among the most significant interventions that a Government

could make. Such a decision should never be taken lightly,...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 cc890-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have contributed to this debate and to the Minister for his response. I reiterate what the noble Lord, Lord Fox, said earlier about the way in which the Minister has given us every opportunity to think ahead into the future...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 cc891-2
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Wigley

4: Clause 2, page 1, line 20, at end insert—

“(d) supporting the local economy of any steel-making location which may be adversely affected by this Act.”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment seeks to ensure that consideration is given to the impact on the local economy arising from decisions made under...

Member
Lord Wigley (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 c892
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move Amendment 4 standing in my name and to speak to Amendment 36, which is also in my name and which is grouped with it—as is Amendment 29 in the name of the noble lord, Lord Fox, and Amendments 30, 31, 43, 44 and 46...

Member
Lord Wigley (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 cc892-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a mixed bag of amendments. I will speak primarily to Amendment 29 in my name but also to some of the others.

Amendment 29 highlights the potentially distorting effects that CBAM—the carbon border adjustment mechanism—would have on various elements of the steel industry, from supplier to steel...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 c893
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 30, 31, 43, 44 and 46 standing in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Hunt of Wirral. I thank the noble Lords, Lord Wigley—who I thought made a very powerful case—and Lord Fox, for their previous speeches.

Amendment 30 goes to...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
857 cc893-7
House
House of Lords