Skip to main content

1-20 of 50 results for subject:G4S

Subject X
Military aid

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Military aid (50)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the estimated cost of the provision of extra troops to meet the failure of the G4S Olympic Games contract to deliver agreed numbers of trained security personnel; and whether that cost will be met from any penalties or fines imposed pursuant to the...

Asked by
Lord Prescott (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Answer received between Monday 17 September and Monday 24 September 2012.
Date
24 September 2012
Reference
739 c377WA; HL1612
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether she has discussed with (a) G4S and (b) others recruitment to serve in security roles at the London 2012 Olympics of experienced retired personnel from Northern Ireland who have served in both the Police Service of Northern Ireland and...

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Home Department
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 September 2012
Reference
118168; 550 c272W
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for coming to the House this evening to repeat the Statement.

I have listened carefully to the Statement and in it the Home Secretary says that following a report from HMIC in February 2012, LOCOG and the Home Office monitored delivery throughout the...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 cc74-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the noble Baroness in her final remarks. I think that all of us want to ensure that this will be a great experience for all those not only taking part in but attending the Olympics. Across all parties, on all sides of this House and...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 cc76-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does my noble friend agree that the important thing now is to plan for the immediate future rather than to look further forward? Who is now in overall charge of the security operation? Is a single individual in charge for both those recruited by G4S and the troops...

Member
Lord Higgins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c77
House
House of Lords

My Lords, working backwards through my noble friend’s questions, if people do not have the appropriate language skills, they will not get accreditation to work. I cannot comment on whether the computer has not been working at the moment but I will make inquiries and let my noble friend know....

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c77
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I raise two questions of a legalistic nature. First, when the contract was placed with G4S, how many other bodies, agencies or companies were in any way shortlisted for consideration? Secondly, the Minister has assured the House that G4S intends to compensate in full any losses suffered. Is...

Member
Lord Elystan-Morgan (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c77
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not have the details of the contract in front of me, but I can once again give the assurance that G4S has made it quite clear that it will meet the extra costs resulting from the errors that it has made. I can categorically assure the...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c77
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is the third time in eight days that Parliament has received assurances from this Government that the security of the Olympic Games will not be compromised. The Government’s desperation in drafting in not only the Armed Forces but now the police is an indication of the total...

Member
Lord Prescott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 cc77-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord overstates his case, and overstates it rather badly. There is no question of privatising the police force, as he claims, although obviously there are certain parts of police work that can be done by private sector companies. That does not mean we are privatising the...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c78
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sure that the Members of this House want to see a safe and secure Games, and that the last-minute increase in the size of the Armed Forces participation in the security operation will help to guarantee this. It is sad that we have had to have...

Member
Lord Dannatt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c78
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Lord for his words, particularly when he says that we should not at this stage be making negative comments about the Games. We want them to be a good set of Games—we want them to be secure, but not to be...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c79
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can the Minister assure the House that adequate training will be available, given that so many individuals will be coming to the job so late, and that the right training will be given to people designated to particular jobs? There was an unfortunate item on the news last...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c79
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can give my noble friend an assurance that everyone doing a job involving security will have adequate training and we shall make sure that people who do not have adequate training will not be accredited.

Regarding whether the G4S contract will be published, that might be a matter...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c79
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are where we are, and I entirely agree with the Minister that this is not the time for looking retrospectively and trying to find out what happened. However, the fact of the matter is that every week, every day and almost every hour we hear things that...

Member
Baroness Billingham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c79
House
House of Lords

My Lords, again, I suspect that the noble Baroness is exaggerating by saying that every day there is some new problem. There were problems last week and over the weekend there were further press reports that have now been dealt with by my right honourable friend in her Answer, where...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was part of the Bill team that worked with Tessa Jowell for several years, from the first time that we brought the Bill through all the way up until the election. We worked together to make sure that these Games were delivered by the British Parliament as...

Member
Lord Glentoran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful for what my noble friend said, particularly about Tessa Jowell and all the work that she has done for the Olympics ever since she put that bid in some time back in 2002, or whenever it started. The point that she made, which again...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, could the Minister persuade our Government to talk to the Government of Israel about transferring, as a good-will gesture, the G4S personnel who are currently guarding—rather brutally—the illegal settlements in the Occupied Territories of

Palestine? Could he persuade them to transfer those people, thus making the Games a...

Member
Baroness Tonge (Independent Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not think that is a point that I need to respond to.

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c81
House
House of Lords