Skip to main content

1-20 of 89 results for subject:Architecture

Subject X
Land use

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Land use (89)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Statement on the Government's plans to overhaul the planning system.

Lead member
Matthew Pennycook
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 cc793-812
House
House of Commons

With your permission, Madam Deputy Speaker, I will make a statement on the Government’s ongoing efforts to overhaul the planning system.

As the House is fully aware, England remains in the grip of an acute and entrenched housing crisis. It is a crisis, first and foremost, that is blighting countless lives,...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 cc793-6
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for advance sight of his statement.

This Labour Government’s last planning framework began pushing development on to rural areas, prioritising concreting over the green belt and green fields rather than focusing on supporting building in urban areas, which is where we need to build most. From what...

Member
Gareth Bacon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 cc796-7
House
House of Commons

I thank the shadow Minister for his questions. I appreciate that he has not had a huge amount of time to look over today’s announcement, but he has completely misunderstood one of the primary thrusts of the changes we are making, which is to double down on a brownfield-first approach....

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 cc797-8
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his statement. I commend him for his work on bringing the planning system up to date, which can be quite a technical process, and on the landmark Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which will receive Royal Assent later this month. I welcome the fact that the...

Member
Florence Eshalomi (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c798
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend the Chair of the Select Committee, who makes a very good point. The Conservative party does not want development on the greenbelt, and it does not want urban and suburban intensification; in short, it does not want homes brought forward in the volume required to...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 cc799-789
House
House of Commons

Although I am grateful to the Minister for advance sight of his statement, I fear that it represents an unprecedented removal of power from local people and local government by a Government who appear to have given up on sustainable development as a driving force behind decision making. The cost-benefit...

Member
Gideon Amos (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c789
House
House of Commons

I have a lot of time for the hon. Gentleman, but again, I think he misrepresents what is in this new framework, with regard to local involvement and local engagement. He seeks to give the impression that there are no safeguards on development in the new framework, and that is...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c800
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for the statement, and for the support for getting our housing market going again, particularly when it comes to brownfield sites; proposals for many of them are still being held up right across the country. He says that he will not at this stage make NDMPs...

Member
Chris Curtis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c800
House
House of Commons

I do not have the time to go into incredible amounts of detail on why we did not choose to take a statutory approach to national development management policies. Suffice it to say that the approach carried considerable uncertainty and risks. There has been a long debate—I can see Members...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c800
House
House of Commons

We do not have green belt in east Kent. We used to have something called farmland; it is now called blighted land, because it has been zoned for housing, but it is not being built on. House building in east Kent has virtually come to a grinding halt, and houses...

Member
Roger Gale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c801
House
House of Commons

I will say two things to the right hon. Gentleman. First, the draft framework we have published today continues to provide the protections for agricultural land that are in place in the NPPF as revised last December, including a preference that development be directed towards areas of poorer-quality agricultural land....

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c801
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend that the housing crisis has become an emergency, but can I ask for detail on an issue that I have raised with him in the House before? He said that it is a default yes for suitable proposals for the development of land around...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c801
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right that the new framework proposes a default yes to suitable proposals around train stations, particularly targeting well-connected train stations across the country, as I mentioned. He will know that in the revisions we made to the NPPF last December, we strengthened protections for playing fields....

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c790
House
House of Commons

As the Minister knows, in Wiltshire, speculative development is often approved without consideration of access to active travel routes, health provision, school places, and access to public transport, so that our residents can reach work or education. This leads to areas of extreme deprivation, caused, according to the Government’s own...

Member
Sarah Gibson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c802
House
House of Commons

There is a lot in the hon. Lady’s question, but let me say a couple of things. First, we have been clear as a Government that when new housing comes forward, it must be matched with new amenities and infrastructure. We strengthened the policies in the previous framework last year...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c802
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on his efforts to get the homes built that the country needs, particularly for young people, who face the prospect of never being able to afford a home of their own. I have two questions. First, does he think that where a site is earmarked...

Member
Clive Betts (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c802
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend tempts me, I think deliberately, to comment on his local plan, which, for reasons that he will appreciate, I cannot do. On the general principles, there are many factors that need to be considered when planning committees, officers or elected members consider particular application, but we want...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c802
House
House of Commons

Within a mile of the well-connected stations of Radlett, Cuffley, Borehamwood, Potters Bar and Bushey there is pristine countryside that is treasured by local communities and prevents urban sprawl. The opening up of this green belt to a development free-for-all runs totally contrary to the promises made by the Labour...

Member
Oliver Dowden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c803
House
House of Commons

I have huge respect for the right hon. Gentleman, but it is absolutely incorrect to say that the draft framework proposes a free-for-all in relation to land around railway stations. As I have said, we want to establish, in principle, a default “yes” for development around railway stations within existing...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
777 c791
House
House of Commons