Skip to main content

1-20 of 30 results for subject:Secrecy

Subject X
Freedom of expression

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Freedom of expression (30)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords statement on privacy injunctions.

Lead member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness
Department
Advocate General for Scotland
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1634-43
House
House of Lords

Does my noble and learned friend accept that Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which provides for the right to freedom of expression, is qualified? It is that the exercise of that freedom, "““carries with it duties and responsibilities””," and, "““may be subject to such formalities, conditions,...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1639
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend is right to quote at length Article 10. As I said earlier to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer of Thoroton, these issues and the tensions between Articles 8 and 10 were considered at considerable length during the passage of the Human Rights Bill...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1639-40
House
House of Lords

I would certainly agree with the noble Lord. No doubt when the Joint Committee comes to take evidence, the professional bodies, the Law Society and Bar Council, will be bodies that it will want to seek evidence from—as well, no doubt, as from individuals who have much experience to bring...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1640
House
House of Lords

I certainly hear what the noble Lord says and, as he has indicated, the terms of reference are still to be agreed. Without any commitment on whether it might be included, I will certainly draw his comments and the Bill that he previously introduced to the attention of my right...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1639
House
House of Lords

We on these Benches welcome the report, which recognises that where secrecy is ordered it should only be to the extent strictly necessary to achieve the interests of justice. We also welcome the provision of notice to the press of an application of this type and the requirement of an...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1639
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister accept that the Bill of Rights and the Parliamentary Papers Act 1840 were passed in ages very different from our own and dealt with circumstances very different from those now relevant? Does he accept that the effect of those Acts very often is to make it possible...

Member
Lord Elystan-Morgan (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1640
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I have already made clear, it is almost self-evident that the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Parliamentary Papers Act 1840 were promulgated in times very different from today. Notwithstanding that, there are clearly some important principles enshrined in them. Indeed, on numerous occasions, even in recent...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1640
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, welcome the establishment of the Joint Committee. What I really want to ask is whether the new media will be part of the remit, and whether there are ways in which one can restrain publication there. I have a great reluctance in saying that I do...

Member
Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1640-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sure that my noble friend would agree that it would not be proper for me to comment on any one particular case. If there is an issue of more general importance, I am sure that it will be possible for these concerns to be fed into...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1643
House
House of Lords

As I indicated, it is a draft Bill, so there will be opportunity to consider issues on parliamentary privilege that go wider than the important issues raised here. The terms of reference of the Joint Committee are not yet established, and it would be wrong of me to pre-empt that,...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1642
House
House of Lords

In his opening remarks, my noble and learned friend referred to consultation with the other place about the Joint Committee. Will he confirm that there will be consultation with this place, the other part of Parliament? I echo the remarks of the noble Baroness, Lady Kennedy, about the relevance of...

Member
Lord Inglewood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1642
House
House of Lords

It will not surprise the noble Lord that my department brought that case to my attention this morning.

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1641
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly support the suggestion made by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, that the proposed Joint Committee should also examine the parallel dilemma—and it is a very difficult one—of the balance to be struck between parliamentary privilege and the need for Parliament to respect the separation...

Member
Lord Davies of Stamford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1642
House
House of Lords

That is the challenge to all parliamentarians—to reflect the views of the people. As my right honourable friend the Attorney-General indicated in his Statement, which I read, there are very clearly tensions in the balance between privacy and freedom of expression, and no doubt these will be issues for the...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1641
House
House of Lords

May I be allowed very briefly to remind the House of one respect in which the events of last weekend were duplicated some 30 years ago in an attempt, in which I was peripherally involved, to get an injunction on the book by my namesake, Peter Wright, called Spycatcher? An...

Member
Lord Wright of Richmond (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1641
House
House of Lords

Does my noble and learned friend accept that in a settled society, the strength of its laws derives from the support of the majority the population? The black code or the death sentence were abolished not only because judges and Parliament abolished them but because the public ceased to support...

Member
Lord Fellowes of West Stafford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1641
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I endorse those last comments about the importance of the internet and electronic media. That issue will have to be considered. Regarding the establishment of the committee, the indication was that the Justice Secretary and the Culture Secretary would be liaising with the chairs of the Liaison Committee...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1642
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the report in the interests of open justice. The issue that I raised last Thursday was part of a longstanding commitment by my noble friend Lord Oakeshott to ensure that the Financial Services Authority publishes a full report on the reasons for the collapse of the...

Member
Lord Stoneham of Droxford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1642-3
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord for repeating the Attorney-General’s Statement. I agree with a great deal of it. As far as this side is concerned, we agree that there should be a privacy law. Of course, the privacy law has to respect free speech. It involves...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1635-6
House
House of Lords