1-11 of 11 results for primarymember:"Gareth Johnson"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.283 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- primarymember:"Gareth Johnson"
- We searched for
- primaryMember_ses:301486
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Report stage. New clause 1 (Offence of wearing awards with intent to deceive triable summarily), discussed with new clauses 2 to 9. At 2.30 pm, the debate was adjourned. Bill to be further considered on Friday 24 March.
Report stage. New clause 1 (Offence of wearing awards with intent to deceive triable summarily), discussed with new clauses 2 to 9. At 2.30 pm, the debate was adjourned. Bill to be further considered on Friday 24 March.
Clauses 1 and 2 disagreed to. Clause 3 agreed to as amended. Clause 1 discussed with new clause 1 (Offence of wearing awards with intent to deceive) and new schedule 1 (Awards). New clause 1 agreed to. New schedule 1 agreed to. Title amended. Bill, as amended, to be reported (Bill 134).
Clauses 1 and 2 disagreed to. Clause 3 agreed to as amended. Clause 1 discussed with new clause 1 (Offence of wearing awards with intent to deceive) and new schedule 1 (Awards). New clause 1 agreed to. New schedule 1 agreed to. Title amended. Bill, as amended, to be reported...
Motion that the House sit in private. Negatived on question. Second reading. Part 1 of 2.
Motion that the House sit in private. Negatived on question. Second reading. Part 1 of 2.
Second reading. Agreed to on question. Bill committed to a Public Bill Committee. Part 2 of 2.
Second reading. Agreed to on question. Bill committed to a Public Bill Committee. Part 2 of 2.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people have been prosecuted in magistrates courts for providing false information relating to their financial circumstances in each of the last five years; and how many of those prosecutions related to applications for legal aid.
[159006]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people have been prosecuted in magistrates courts for providing false information relating to their financial circumstances in each of the last five years; and how many of those prosecutions related to applications for legal aid.
[159006]
The number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts for offences relating to “dishonestly making a false representation to make a gain for oneself or another or to cause loss to another or to expose another to risk” in each of the last five years from 2008 to 2012 (latest data available) can be viewed in the table.
However, it is not possible from centrally held data to separately analyse which of these prosecutions related to applications for legal aid.
| Defendants
proceeded against at magistrates courts for dishonestly making a false
representation to make a gain for oneself or another or to cause loss
to another or to expose another to risk1,
2008-122,3 | |
| Number | |
| 20084 | 5,718 |
| 2009 | 8,530 |
| 2010 | 9,395 |
| 20115 | 9,184 |
| 2012 | 8,666 |
| 1
An offence under Section 2 of the Fraud Act, which came into force on
15 January
2007. 2 The figures given in the table relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. 3 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. 4 Excludes data for Cardiff magistrates court for April, July and August 2008. 5 Following further validation and receipt of additional magistrates court records, a number of revisions have been made to previously published 2011 information. As such, 2011 figures may not match what was previously provided. Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice |
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many incidents of benefit fraud were detected in each of the last five years; and in each such year how many such cases resulted in (a) a formal caution, (b) an administrative penalty and (c) a criminal prosecution.
[123572]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many incidents of benefit fraud were detected in each of the last five years; and in each such year how many such cases resulted in (a) a formal caution, (b) an administrative penalty and (c) a criminal prosecution.
[123572]
The Fraud Investigation Service (FIS) is responsible for benefit fraud investigation within the Department for Work and Pensions.
The figures provided in the following table are the number of cases closed for the last five financial years (1 April to 31 March), following an investigation.
| Number
of cases
closed | |
| 2007/081 | 63,080 |
| 2008/09 | 156,769 |
| 2009/10 | 150,365 |
| 2010/11 | 155,559 |
| 2011/12 | 166,073 |
| 1
Figures are from 1 July 2007 to 31 March 2008 when the Fraud Referral
and Intervention Management system (FRAIMS) was
introduced. |
The figures provided in the following table are the number of cases where fraud was proved and the subsequent outcome for each financial year requested.
| Number
of administrative
penalties | Number
of
cautions | Number
of convictions for benefit fraud
offences | |
| 2007/08 | 8,566 | 12,821 | 7,745 |
| 2008/09 | 7,160 | 14,320 | 6,700 |
| 2009/10 | 7,249 | 15,117 | 7,040 |
| 2010/11 | 7,625 | 15,574 | 8,598 |
| 2011/12 | 7,364 | 15,939 | 9,861 |
The number of cases closed may not directly relate to the number of administrative penalties, cautions-and convictions in the same year and therefore the data cannot be directly compared. This is due to the length of time it can take for some cases to conclude and sentencing be passed, which may span more than one tax year.
The information supplied by the Department has not been subjected to the rigorous quality assurance checks applied to our published official statistics. It is therefore possible this information may change due to operational reasons.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions whether there were any changes in policy on dealing with benefit fraud between 2009 and 2012; and if he will set out details of any such changes.
[123573]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions whether there were any changes in policy on dealing with benefit fraud between 2009 and 2012; and if he will set out details of any such changes.
[123573]
The Department introduced the ‘one-strike’ penalty for conviction, penalty or caution for benefit offences under The Welfare Reform Act 2009 which came into effect from 1 April 2010.
In October 2010 we outlined our plans for reducing fraud and error overpayments in the welfare system by £1.4 billion by March 2015 through our fraud and error strategy “Tackling fraud and error in the benefit and tax credits systems”. The strategy was refreshed in a joint report with HMRC and the Cabinet Office in February 2012.
These plans include delivering an integrated risk and intelligence service, a hub for collecting and analysing claimant information and applying fraud and error prevention filters. The Department is also developing the Single Fraud Investigation Service with HMRC and local authorities, joining expertise and efforts in investigating fraud. We have also worked with partners on the mobile regional taskforce pilots focusing on intelligence led campaigns in high fraud risk areas.
The Welfare Reform Act 2012 provides the Department with tougher powers to punish and deter welfare cheats. A tougher minimum administrative penalty was introduced in May 2012 and from 1 October a new civil penalty came into force for claimant error. The Act will also introduce more stringent mechanisms for rapidly and effectively recovering debts. The Department and HMRC have increased the maximum rate at which fraud debts can be recovered by deduction from benefits by around 25%. This new recovery rate for fraud debts was introduced in April 2012.
With the introduction of universal credit in 2013, the benefits system will also be made simpler and, as far as possible, the opportunities for fraud and error to enter our systems will be greatly reduced.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate his Department has made of the amount of money (a) recovered from and (b) lost through benefit fraud in each of the last 10 years.
[123574]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate his Department has made of the amount of money (a) recovered from and (b) lost through benefit fraud in each of the last 10 years.
[123574]
The estimated amount of money lost through benefit fraud can be found on the DWP National Statistics Fraud and Error in the Benefit System webpage
http://statistics.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd2/index.php?page=fraud_error
For the last 10 years the estimated level of benefit fraud was as follows:
| Amount | ||
| £
billion | Percentage
of benefit
expenditure | |
| 2011-12
(preliminary) | 1.1 | 0.7 |
| 2010-11 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 2009-10 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| 2008-09 | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 2007-08 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 2006-07 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 2005-06 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 2004-05 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 2003-04 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2002-03 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Note: There was a discontinuity in the above time series prior to 2005-06, so fraud and error estimates pre-2005-06 can not be directly compared to the estimates from 2005-06 onwards. |
A proportion of this money fraudulently claimed is subsequently identified and recovered by the Department. For overpayment recovery purposes a debt can be classified only as fraudulent if a customer has been convicted of an offence, admitted the offence in an interview under caution or agreed to an administrative penalty. Otherwise the debt is classified as customer error. The total value of overpayments identified in 2011-12 where recovery was sought totalled £486.9 million. The total the Department recovered in 2011-12 was over £375 million, of which £354 million related to benefit overpayments. The actual amount of benefit overpayments classified as fraud that have been recovered since 2007-08 are shown in the following table.
| Financial
year | Value
of recoveries (£
million) |
| 2007-08 | 25 |
| 2008-09 | 25 |
| 2009-10 | 28 |
| 2010-11 | 33 |
| 2011-12 | 39 |
| Sum | 149 |
| Source: Debt Accounting. This does not form official statistics but is derived from Management Information. This data is only available from 2007-08. |
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many staff his Department employs to investigate benefit fraud; and what estimate he has made of the cost to the public purse of investigation of benefit fraud in the last year for which figures are available.
[121865]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many staff his Department employs to investigate benefit fraud; and what estimate he has made of the cost to the public purse of investigation of benefit fraud in the last year for which figures are available.
[121865]
The Department's Fraud Investigation Service had 2,823 full time equivalent members of staff in employment on 12 August 2012 to investigate benefit fraud.
The Department's Fraud Investigation Service total spend for investigating benefit fraud in 2011-12 was £99.5 million.
The total amount of recoverable overpayments identified as a result of fraud investigations for 2011-12 is £214,832,021.
The information supplied by the Department for recoverable overpayments has not been subjected to the rigorous quality assurance checks applied to our published official statistics. It is therefore possible this information may change due to operational reasons.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people were prosecuted for illegally claiming jobseeker’s allowance while working in each of the last 10 years.
[119051]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people were prosecuted for illegally claiming jobseeker’s allowance while working in each of the last 10 years.
[119051]
It is not possible to say how many people were prosecuted for failing to declare work or earnings while claiming jobseeker’s allowance (JSA). However departmental records indicate that the number of people prosecuted for failing to declare any income or circumstance affecting JSA claims were:
November 2009 to March 2010: 216
2010-11: 1,264
2011-12: 1,480.
The above figures include all offences (not just working while claiming benefit) and could therefore also relate to:
non-declaration of capital
non-declaration of a partner in employment
non-declaration of other income affecting JSA.
The number of prosecutions arising from fraudulent claims to JSA is not available prior to November 2009 because information by benefit type was not recorded before that date.
Data source:
Fraud Referral and Intervention Management System (FRAIMS)
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people were prosecuted for fraudulent claims for jobseeker's allowance in each of the last three years; and how many of those had addresses in Dartford constituency.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people were prosecuted for fraudulent claims for jobseeker's allowance in each of the last three years; and how many of those had addresses in Dartford constituency.
| Number | |
| 2007-08 | 9,538 |
| 2008-09 | 8,701 |
| 2009-10 | 7,709 |