Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,519 results for subject:Liability

Subject X
Fines

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Fines (1,519)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Committee stage: except clauses 1 to 8, schedules 1 and 2, clauses 9, 10, 69 and 62, schedule 12, clauses 63 to 68 and 83 to 85, schedule 13, clause 86 and any new clauses or new schedules relating to the subject matter of these clauses and schedules. Clauses 156...

Lead member
Lucy Rigby; Dan Tomlinson
Answering member
Mark Garnier; James Wild
Department
Treasury
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee
Date
3 February 2026
House
House of Commons

My Honourable Friend, the Parliamentary Under Secretary for Transport (Simon Lightwood) has made the following Ministerial Statement.

I wish to provide the House with an update on further steps the government is taking to implement the Automated Vehicles (AV) Act 2024 and kickstart economic growth. Self-driving vehicles have the potential to...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Written statements
Date
4 December 2025
Reference
HLWS1130
House
House of Lords

I wish to provide the House with an update on further steps the government is taking to implement the Automated Vehicles (AV) Act 2024 and kickstart economic growth. Self-driving vehicles have the potential to increase opportunities and break down barriers for how people and goods move around the country, making...

Member
Simon Lightwood (Labour)
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Written statements
Date
4 December 2025
Reference
HCWS1131
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Notes
Government bill presented 11 September 2024.
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
CHAP 26 2025, 2025 c. 26

Lords committee stage fifth day. Clauses 17 to 31 agreed to. Schedule 2, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 32 to 34, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 35 to 63 agreed to. New clause agreed to.

Lead member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage
Answering member
Lord Hunt of Wirral; Baroness Scott of Bybrook; Lord Roborough; Lord Jamieson
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Scottish legislative consent granted, Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 cc1969-2052
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for what he has just said, reminding us of the importance of declaring interests in Committee if they have not been declared so far, but will he make a statement to the Committee about the Government’s

plans for further consideration of this Bill,...

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 c1969
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Scott of Bybrook

145: Clause 17, page 26, line 24, leave out “beyond reasonable doubt” and insert “on the balance of probabilities”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment, and another in the name of Baroness Scott of Bybrook, seeks to apply the normal standard of proof for civil cases for these fines...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 c1970
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to make it very clear that we will not have had six days in Committee. I quite agree with the noble Lord, Lord Shipley.

I do not feel that I can open this group without paying tribute to the late noble and learned Lord, Lord Etherton. His...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 cc1970-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 148, 197, 200 and 242 on behalf of the noble Earl, Lord Kinnoull.

First, I join my noble friend Lady Scott of Bybrook by expressing my sincere condolences to the family and friends of the late noble and learned Lord, Lord Etherton. His reputation...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 cc1971-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I echo from our Benches the sincere condolences to Lord Etherton’s husband, Andrew, and their family. They really do have our most sincere condolences.

I also echo the concerns that were delivered in a rather measured way by my noble friend Lord Shipley regarding the way that things...

Member
Baroness Thornhill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 cc1972-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, may I say how sorry I am to have to deal with Lord Etherton’s amendments after his sad passing? I did not have a long time to get to know him, but during my time in this House, I truly appreciated both his engagement and his wisdom on...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 cc1973-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I am really disappointed because a number of noble Lords who have been involved in all these debates over the past four days in Committee are unable to be in their seats because of the later time of day. That will not help us scrutinise this Bill...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 c1974
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Scott of Bybrook

167: Clause 21, page 39, line 33, after “child” insert “or grandchild”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment seeks to probe the Government’s willingness to recognise in law the close family ties many people have with their first cousins once removed and other removed cousins.

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 c1976
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendments I have tabled in this group are to probe the Government’s decision to define a family in the way they have in Clause 21. The Explanatory Notes to this part of the Bill state:

“Subsection (4) provides that where there are two or more tenants and one...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 cc1976-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while it is understandable that some individuals have close bonds with more distant relatives, extending the definition of “family member” to include removed or second cousins could complicate the interpretation and enforcement of these provisions, which currently offer a clear and practical framework. Broadening the definition further could...

Member
Baroness Grender (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 c1977
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendments in the name of my noble friend Lady Scott of Bybrook, but I want first to express great sympathy to the husband of Lord Etherton.

It seems entirely sensible to widen the definition of family within the Bill to include first and second cousins. I...

Member
Lord Northbrook (Other (affiliation); Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 c1977
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Scott, for her amendments relating to guarantors and family members, as well as the noble Baroness, Lady Grender, and the noble Lord, Lord Northbrook, for contributing to the debate.

Amendments 167, 168 and 169 would expand the definition of “family member” used in...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 cc1977-8
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for her response, but I do not think that we have quite got to a better understanding of the Government’s reasons for defining a family in this way; it is just that they are going to define a family in this way.

I point out...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 c1978
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Lister of Burtersett

170: After Clause 21, insert the following new Clause—

“Restriction on landlord’s ability to require tenant to provide guarantor

(1) A relevant person must not, in any of the circumstances set out in subsection (3), require a person, as a condition of the grant of a relevant tenancy,...

Member
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 cc1978-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendment 265. Both amendments aim to strengthen the very welcome anti-discrimination provisions in the Bill. I am grateful to colleagues who have added their names and to Shelter for its help.

Amendment 170 sets out the circumstances in which a landlord may not require...

Member
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
845 cc1979-1982
House
House of Lords