Skip to main content

1-20 of 957 results for subject:Genetics

Subject X
Evidence

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Evidence (957)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Secretary Theresa May
Department
Home Office
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
30 October 2013
Reference
SI 2013/2770
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Theresa May
Department
Home Office
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
10 October 2013
Reference
SI 2013/2580
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Philip Hammond
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
10 October 2013
Reference
SI 2013/2554
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

Letter dated 27/01/2011 from James Brokenshire MP to Keith Vaz MP regarding Forensic Science Service. 4 p.

Deposited by
Home Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
28 January 2011
Reference
DEP2011-0167
House
House of Commons

Review of Research and Development in Forensic Science: Background and Terms of Reference. 2 p.

Deposited by
Home Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
27 January 2011
Reference
DEP2011-0149
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on DNA and CCTV.

Lead member
Philip Davies
Answering member
James Brokenshire
Department
Home Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c22-45WH
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister explain briefly how having a DNA profile put on a database can affect someone's private rights? How does their profile being on a database impinge on their rights?

Member
David Nuttall (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c44WH
House
House of Commons

I think that I touched earlier on the fact that it is a question of the way the state may perceive an individual as a criminal, when they are innocent, and the impact of that on a person. As a Home Office Minister I sign many letters to honourable colleagues...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c44-5WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady makes an important point about the nature of regulation. We are considering its ambit and scope in relation to public versus private areas, and publicly-owned versus privately-owned CCTV. Of course we are conscious of the regulatory burden and the possible regulatory impact. That will be a factor...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c44WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Chope, and I hope that you will pass my thanks to Mr Speaker for granting the debate. It is a welcome opportunity because the debate on the effectiveness of DNA and CCTV in tackling crime has, up to press, been...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c22-3WH
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree with me that CCTV evidence has had a big impact in reducing the number of contested prosecutions and, therefore, the cost to the criminal justice system?

Member
Emma Reynolds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c23WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is absolutely right and has pre-empted what I was about to say. In this age of austerity, we should be trying to find ways of reducing the cost of the criminal justice system, and as she rightly noted, CCTV is a key way of doing that. Unless...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c23-5WH
House
House of Commons

I do not think that in this debate any Member is likely to say that they are not in favour of CCTV, but I do want to see where the boundaries of the hon. Gentleman's enthusiasm for these systems stop. The ANPR system in Birmingham was installed in a predominantly...

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c25WH
House
House of Commons

One purpose of this debate was to flush out the fact that people do support CCTV, even though they are always reluctant to say so, and I am therefore grateful to the hon. Gentleman for saying that he now supports it. On his point, surely the solution is to have...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c25WH
House
House of Commons

Has the hon. Gentleman, or any Member here, ever had a constituent come to their advice surgery asking for less CCTV, or for CCTV systems to be taken away?

Member
Siobhain McDonagh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c25WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady makes a fantastic point. I certainly have never had anybody in my surgery making such a request—quite the opposite. If I am ever lobbied by any of my constituents regarding CCTV, it is because they want more of it—they would like some of it down their street,...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c25-6WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend rightly mentions that at birth everyone is issued with a national insurance number. It seems that if a DNA sample was linked to a child's national insurance number when they were registered in the national insurance system, the allegation that the retention of DNA profiles is unfair...

Member
David Nuttall (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c26WH
House
House of Commons

I agree with the right hon. Lady; she is absolutely right. There is always the risk that, the day after any cut-off point, someone could, for example, go out and commit a murder. In that instance, such a person's previous DNA would not be available to the police so that...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c29WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is making an excellent speech. Would he agree with my right hon. Friend the Member for Kingston upon Hull West and Hessle (Alan Johnson), the former Home Secretary, that before we rush into any hasty decisions, it is at least worth retaining the DNA database until 2012,...

Member
Caroline Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c29WH
House
House of Commons

I, too, congratulate the hon. Member for Shipley (Philip Davies) on securing this debate on an important subject. For me, the title of the debate is important because it specifies tackling crime by effectively dealing with either the prevention or detection of crime. In this way, it mimics the most...

Member
Mike Crockart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2010
Reference
513 c32-4WH
House
House of Commons