Skip to main content

1-20 of 5,299 results for subject:"Disclosure of information"

Subject X
Equality

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (16) + Acts (6)
-
Public acts (6)
+ Bills (3) + Public bills (3)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (7)
-
Statutory instruments (7)
+ Members' contributions (4,969)
-
Business questions (6)
-
Maiden speeches (8)
-
Oral answers to questions (3)
+ Oral questions (4)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (4,962)
+ Parliamentary committees (85) + Committee proceedings (69)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (22)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (4)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (31)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (7)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (6)
-
Select Committee written evidence (3)
+ Parliamentary papers (54)
-
Annual reports (1)
-
Command papers (6)
-
Consultation papers (3)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (4)
-
Deposited papers (28)
-
House of Commons papers (9)
-
House of Lords papers (4)
-
Impact assessments (8)
-
Unprinted papers (2)
-
White papers (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (154) + Debates (125)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (69)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (22)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (4)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (31)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Debates on select committee reports (2)
+ Legislative debates (114)
-
Debates on bills (107)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (7)
-
Opposition days (2)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Statements (28) + Oral statements (3)
-
Ministerial statements (3)
-
Written statements (25)
+ Written corrections (1)
-
Ministerial corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (104)
-
Business questions (6)
+ Oral questions (4)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Written questions (94)
+ Research briefings (10) + Commons Briefing papers (10)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Equality (5,299)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords committee stage. Clauses 1 and 2, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 3 and 4 agreed to. Clause 5, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 6 and 7 agreed to. Clauses 8 and 9, as amended, agreed to. Schedule 1, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 10 to 17 agreed to. Schedule...

Lead member
Lord Leong
Answering member
Lord Hunt of Wirral; Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Department
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Northern Ireland, Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1057-1132
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Holmes of Richmond

1: Clause 1, page 2, line 5, at end insert—

“(1A) The purchaser must advise the supplier how the supplier should submit notice as set out in subsection (1).

(1B) Where the purchaser fails to advise the supplier on how to submit notice, the supplier may rely on...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1057-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to start this Committee on the Commercial Payments Bill. In doing so, I declare my relevant technology interests as adviser to the Crown Estate and Simmons & Simmons LLP, and as non-executive director of the Avalanche Foundation and Avalanche (BVI) Inc. The Bill is...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1058-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 10 in my name. Before that, I commend the noble Lord, Lord Holmes, on Amendments 1 and 9. These seem to be eminently sensible suggestions. I wonder whether, if the Small Business Commissioner makes very clear their view on when the clock starts...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1059
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Holmes of Richmond for introducing this debate. I welcome all noble Lords back for what will, I am sure, be a productive Committee stage.

I shall begin with Amendment 1. I understand the principle behind my noble friend’s approach. The Bill performs a...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1059-1060
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I thank all noble Lords for their contributions to this short debate; I thank in particular the noble Lords, Lord Holmes and Lord Fox, for their Amendments 1, 9 and 10. I pay tribute to the noble Lord, Lord Holmes, for all his work in the area...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1060-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have taken part in this debate and the Minister for his response. Amendment 1 is not seeking to be overly prescriptive but merely to be clear. While I understand the Minister’s points, there is still a gap in the middle with the...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1062
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Holmes of Richmond

2: Clause 1, page 2, leave out lines 8 and 9 and insert “30 days”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment seeks to make the maximum payment period 30 days, instead of 60 days, where the purchaser is not a public authority.

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1062
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is a wonderful structure to the groupings so far. Group 1 started with Amendment 1 and group 2 starts with Amendment 2—we are all following so far. In moving Amendment 2, in my name, I will speak to Amendment 7.

Amendment 2 is simply a probing amendment and...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1062-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to follow my indefatigable noble friend Lord Holmes and congratulate him on his Amendments 2 and 3. I agree that there is a real risk that 60 days will become the default, whereas 30 days is the market norm. I took the trouble to check with...

Member
Lord Leigh of Hurley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1063-4
House
House of Lords

That was a hint to rise. I will speak to my Amendment 52, but I must first apologise to the Committee that I was unable to speak at Second Reading, my scrutiny hours having been occupied in the passage of another Bill, which also accounts for why this was rather...

Member
Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1064-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will begin by picking up where I left off in group 1, by briefly touching upon Amendment 7 in the name of my noble friend Lord Holmes of Richmond. Just as we should not define a payment as complete until it has passed through an intermediary and...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1065-7
House
House of Lords

Your Lordships have shown a degree of creativity on this group. We have talked about end-of-month processing, public holidays and the effect on privatisation, nationalisation or special administration, and we have just heard about crypto payments. Of those four, I ask that the Minister focuses first on the special administration...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1067-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for their contributions and amendments in this group. The Government share the objective of fair payment rules and are committed to ensuring that businesses, especially SMEs, are paid promptly. The 60-day period was set following extensive consultation with industry, with more than 850...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1068
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister have an analysis of the various levels and sizes of the entities that responded to the consultation, married to the length of time that they sought? If he does not have it at his fingertips, he could write. In effect, does the research show an interesting picture...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1068
House
House of Lords

I am sure we do; I will speak to officials and make sure I share that information with all noble Lords.

This represents a significant strengthening of existing law, where payment terms of more than 60 days are often imposed on suppliers. Some smaller businesses argue that 60 days remains too...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1068-1070
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, may I push him a bit on a point he made? He said that Amendment 43 could not be accepted because it would cut across all insolvency legislation by not treating all suppliers or creditors equally. Does he recognise the special situation of certain suppliers...

Member
Lord Leigh of Hurley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1069
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for bringing that specific example. I need to be very specific about this, because it refers to a particular organisation; I need to get my facts correct and will write to him.

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1069
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who participated in this debate and tabled amendments, and I thank the Minister for his response. It was already clear but is particularly so with that final exchange: the SAR provisions are particularly significant and could barely be more up to the minute,...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1069-1071
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Leong

6: Clause 1, page 3, line 2, leave out “(implied payment terms in certain public contracts)”

Member’s explanatory statement

This minor amendment omits a description of sections of the Procurement Act 2023 which was not wholly accurate.

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1071
House
House of Lords