Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,821 results for subject:"Property development"

Subject X
Brownfield sites

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (6) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (5) + Public bills (5)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (4)
-
Presentation bills (2)
-
Ten minute rule bills (2)
+ Members' contributions (1,641)
-
Business questions (1)
-
Oral answers to questions (51)
-
Oral question time interventions (2)
+ Oral questions (56)
-
Prime Minister's questions (3)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,532)
+ Parliamentary committees (19) + Committee proceedings (8)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (4)
-
Select Committee reports (6)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (5)
+ Parliamentary papers (19)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Consultation papers (1)
-
Deposited papers (5)
-
House of Commons papers (5)
-
House of Lords papers (3)
-
Impact assessments (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (53) + Debates (38)
-
Adjournment debates (9)
-
Backbench debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (8)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (4)
-
e-petition debates (1)
+ Legislative debates (24)
-
Debates on bills (21)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (3)
-
Opposition days (1)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Statements (13) + Oral statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (2)
-
Written statements (11)
+ Parliamentary questions (156)
-
Business questions (1)
+ Oral questions (56)
-
Prime Minister's questions (3)
-
Written questions (99)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (2)
-
Commons Briefing papers (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Brownfield sites (1,821)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps she is taking to ensure that local planning authorities prioritise brownfield development and urban densification before considering the release of Green Belt land in Surrey Heath constituency.

Asked by
Al Pinkerton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
28162
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Florence Eshalomi
Answering member
Gareth Bacon
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Second Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
7 September 2026
House
House of Commons

My Lords, the remediation of residential buildings with unsafe cladding in England is a priority for this Government. Nine years on from the Grenfell tragedy, there is no justification for any building to remain unsafe. Helping residents to feel safe in their homes and move on from this issue is...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc61-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I wish to welcome the noble Baroness, Lady Blake of Leeds, to her new role. I look forward to working with her; I am sure that we will agree on some occasions, maybe more than most. Let me say right from the beginning that we Liberal Democrats...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc62-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also welcome the noble Baroness, Lady Blake, to her role on the Front Bench. It is great to see her. I remember the number of times that we stood on opposite sides in the LGA. We move on, and we are still in the same relative position.

I...

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc63-4GC
House
House of Lords

I thank noble Lords for their very kind and welcoming comments. It is interesting to reflect on how long we have been working together. The noble Baroness, Lady Pinnock, and I go back, I think, to the last century.

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 c64GC
House
House of Lords

Yes, probably.

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 c64GC
House
House of Lords

It is a great privilege to be in this position, and I very much look forward to working with both the noble Baroness and the noble Lord. I stress “with” rather than “against”, because I think we come from a strong, shared commitment to all things local government—in particular, serving...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc64-6GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Blake of Leeds
Answering member
Lord Jamieson
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
859 cc61-5GC
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if she will take steps to ensure that previously developed and brownfield land is brought forward for housing before undeveloped Green Belt land is released.

Asked by
Sarah Pochin (Reform UK)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
28 August 2026
Reference
25870
House
House of Commons

The Government are missing a huge opportunity by not pushing development on brownfield land over green belt. My constituents believe this, and many Members across the House acknowledge it. In fact, if the Government wanted to, they could meet their housing target by prioritising development on brownfield land first. Does...

Member
Bradley Thomas (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
4 June 2026
Reference
786 c1326
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman seeks an Adjournment or Backbench Business debate, which happens very often following comments made in these sessions, he will know that others share those concerns, and therefore he will hear not just about those concerns, but from the Minister directly.

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2026
Reference
786 c1326
House
House of Commons

Lords message considered. Commons insistence on its disagreement to Lords amendments 89B and 89C, with amendment (a) proposed in lieu, agreed to. Commons insistence on its disagreement with Lords amendments 36, 90 and 155, insists on its amendments 155A to 155F and 155H, with amendment (a) proposed in lieu, agreed...

Lead member
Miatta Fahnbulleh
Answering member
David Simmonds
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 cc848-855
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. Last week, I tabled a written question to the Foreign Secretary, asking whether Jonathan Powell was subject to scrutiny vetting before or after he was appointed as the Prime Minister’s special envoy on the Chagos negotiations. I have not yet received a...

Member
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Type
Points of order
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 c855
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendments 89B and 89C but proposes amendment (a) in lieu of those amendments.

Member
Miatta Fahnbulleh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 c848
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to speak once again on the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill. I thank Members from across the House for their constructive engagement in getting the Bill to this point. This Bill matters because, if we are to transform our economy, drive up living standards and deliver...

Member
Miatta Fahnbulleh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 cc848-850
House
House of Commons

I put on the record my thanks to the Minister and colleagues in her Department for the constructive spirit in which they have approached the negotiations around the Bill. It remains the official Opposition’s view that the Bill’s overall direction of travel is a centralising one: it brings into effect...

Member
David Simmonds (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 cc850-1
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that it is vital that we continue to protect those greenfield sites, as we do in my constituency and, indeed, as Conservative councils do across the country? Does he agree that it is sad that the Reform candidate for the Mayor of London disagrees and...

Member
Peter Fortune (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 c851
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely spot on in what he says. Members across the Chamber have been surprised to hear Reform say that it wishes to tear up London’s green belt as part of the local election campaign. I am grateful to the Minister and her colleagues for recognising, in...

Member
David Simmonds (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 cc851-2
House
House of Commons

I will be brief, as most of the arguments have already been well stated.

We acknowledge the Minister’s argument yesterday that this Bill represents a step forward, not the final destination, and that consistency is needed to make the system function, but it is important that, in seeking that consistency, we...

Member
Gideon Amos (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 cc852-3
House
House of Commons