Skip to main content

1-20 of 283 results for subject:Monuments

Subject X
Crime

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Crime (283)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords committee stage ninth day. Clauses 118 to 122 agreed to. (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Hanson of Flint
Answering member
Lord Davies of Gower
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Northern Ireland legislative consent granted. Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1599-1663
House
House of Lords

How nice it is to be back here again. I oppose Clauses 118, 119 and 120 standing part of the Bill. These clauses introduce a pre-emptive targeting of people based on location rather than behaviour. That should concern anyone who cares about the right to peaceful protest. Under these clauses,...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1604-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I stand to oppose the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb, and to suggest that it is vital that these clauses stand part of the Bill, because protest is strongest when it is open, accountable and proud. A movement that hides its face borrows the language of secrecy;...

Member
Lord Blencathra (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1600-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that was a powerful speech, but it really is not the case that all protesters are in the position of Martin Luther King, Emmeline

Pankhurst, Mahatma Gandhi and the noble Baroness herself. There are protesters who have good reason for wishing to conceal their identity. If I am...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1601-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Pannick. The noble Baroness, Lady Jones, made her point so ably that I was not tempted to speak, until I heard the counter-speech from the noble Lord, Lord Blencathra. It is simply ahistoric to suggest that the suffragettes—those protesters who everybody...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 c1602
House
House of Lords

They went on hunger strike.

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 c1602
House
House of Lords

Indeed, they went on hunger strike. It is simply ahistoric to suggest there was not a significant clandestine element to their operations. I am sure that, if one were to examine other examples the noble Lord gave, one would find greater complexity than he offered us in his very glib...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1602-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Chakrabarti. I agree with everything that she said. I start by reminding the Committee that I have an interest as chair of Big Brother Watch. In this group we are considering Clauses 118, 119 and 120, which are...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1603-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am quite open- minded about the clause on face coverings and whether it is a good or bad thing to have face coverings at protests. I have just a couple of points for the Government in considering whether to change the provisions in any way.

First, imposing more...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1605-6
House
House of Lords

I rather agree with the noble Lord’s concern about how ever more protest laws are to be operated in practice by police officers, who are dealing with a growing and ever more complex statute book. But I wonder what he thinks about the comments from the noble Lord, Lord Strasburger,...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 c1606
House
House of Lords

It is a fair question. I would only say that, generally speaking, if you have a large crowd and a significant number within it wearing masks, the chances of you telling them all to take them off are very limited. If I understand the proposal, it is to prevent people...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 c1606
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I broadly agree with the excellent comments made by the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb, in moving this, as well as the noble Lord, Lord Strasburger. I was reminded, when the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, reminded us of the exemptions, that retrospectively, having been arrested or having...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1606-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too support the position of the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, that Clauses 118 to 120 should be removed altogether from the Bill.

My reasons are twofold. First, I regard it as wrong and unjustified to prohibit people from concealing their identities at demonstrations, as the noble Baroness, Lady...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1607-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb, for tabling these stand part notices. However, we on these Benches are unable to support her as we have general support for Clauses 118 to 120.

The clauses address a very real and increasingly familiar problem in modern protest policing:...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 c1609
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb, for tabling her intention to remove Clauses 118 to 120. The Committee is aware

of the purpose of those clauses. I am grateful for the support of the noble Lords, Lord Davies of Gower and Lord Blencathra, for the...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1609-1610
House
House of Lords

I am so grateful to my noble friend the Minister for giving way. I am glad to hear him restate his commitment to the European Convention on Human Rights. He will know that that statement at the beginning of any Bill is not a certificate of compliance but a belief...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 c1610
House
House of Lords

There were a number of points there. If my noble friend will allow me, I intend to answer the points made during the course of the debate. I say to her straightaway that we have published our analysis of the ECHR obligations; I can refer her to it. I will...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1610-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 c1611
House
House of Lords

In a moment. It is not a Nineteen Eighty-Four dystopia, me becoming Orwellian or the Government becoming Big Brother and being all-seeing. It is about potential criminal activity where a police officer—not the Government, this House or the House of Commons—determines that this action should be taken. If a police...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 c1611
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for giving way. I simply want to ask him this question: how far have the Government stress-tested these clauses against the test posed by the noble Baroness, Lady Chakrabarti? Under the auspices of a future Government less benign than this Labour Government—whom I respect,...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2026
Reference
851 c1611
House
House of Lords