Skip to main content

1-20 of 710 results for subject:Evidence

Subject X
Convictions

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Convictions (710)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Standing Order 40 having been dispensed with, Lords committee stage. Amendment 2 to clause 1 disagreed to on division (76 to 111). Clause 1 agreed to. Clause 2, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 3 to 11 agreed to. Bill reported with amendments (HL Bill 90).

Lead member
Lord Offord of Garvel
Answering member
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 cc1194-1205
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom

2: Clause 1, page 1, line 10, leave out paragraph (c)

Member
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1194
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in the unavoidable absence of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer, I shall speak to Amendments 2, 4, and 6, and to the question that Clause 3 stands part. I shall briefly touch on Amendment 1, which intended to include in the convictions to be overturned by...

Member
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 cc1194-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have Amendment 14 in this group, but just before I get to that, from these Benches, I support everything that the noble Lord, Lord Arbuthnot, just said. Had we had a proper, usual style of Committee we would have debated this for much longer and perhaps even...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1195
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I remain extremely unhappy about this Bill and the way in which it has arisen, but I recognise the overwhelming importance of, at long last, doing justice to sub-postmasters. I assume that the evidence given to the Court of Appeal would have been similar to the evidence given...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1195
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am obviously dealing with this in wash-up. The priority is to ensure that we get this Bill through. The arguments have been very well rehearsed across your Lordships’ House and in the other place about Horizon, the Post Office, Fujitsu and the outcomes of that. At Second...

Member
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 cc1195-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I briefly intervene to thank the noble Lord, Lord McNicol, who has done really sterling work on this, together with my noble friend. I very much agree with his optimism that this matter can be adjusted. I think all of us realise that 13 is an unlucky number...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1196
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will follow on and, I hope, echo that spirit of consensus. One of the spin-offs from the decision to call the election is, of course, that this Bill will make the statute book quicker than it would have in the event that it had gone through a...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 cc1196-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be moving the amendments tabled in my name. I will also discuss the other amendments tabled ahead of Committee.

Amendments 7 and 8 in my name are about condition E. They are technical amendments concerning condition E in Clause 2(6) to ensure that it is clear how...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 cc1197-9
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the help the Minister gave the Constitution Committee when we looked at this matter, although we have obviously been unable to report because of the timescale. Does he believe that the Criminal Cases Review Commission can, within its criteria, take account of important new evidence—namely, the...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1199
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for that. My understanding is that, in this case, which is unprecedented, the CCRC will be able to review new evidence in relation to Horizon.

Amendment 15, in the name of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer of Thoroton, is on consequential provision. The Government...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1199
House
House of Lords

Will my noble friend forgive me? I am still thinking about what he said about the Court of Appeal cases. It seems he has changed his mind in the last hour and I wonder what has propelled him to do that.

Member
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1199
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend. We have been clear in our discussions with him that there are two sides to this argument and great sympathy is expressed for the group in the Court of Appeal cases. At this stage in proceedings, however, the Government are retaining the position as outlined...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1200
House
House of Lords

I may have misunderstood but, when I spoke earlier, I understood that there had been agreement between the various parties, as my noble friend Lord Arbuthnot indicated. My noble friend said that there are “two sides to this”, but I understood that that was part of the agreement and the...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1200
House
House of Lords

May I suggest that we have a 10-minute break to discuss this, please?

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1200
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise to the Committee for the confusion in proceedings this afternoon. I would like to deal with the amendment put forward by my noble friend Lord Arbuthnot in relation to Court of Appeal cases. Proceedings are progressing here at great speed and I am grateful to noble...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 cc1200-2
House
House of Lords

I am sorry, but I am slightly concerned with the proposal that the Post Office could investigate. Will the Government consider providing someone slightly more independent, given some of the issues that have arisen recently?

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1202
House
House of Lords

My understanding is that, obviously, the first port of call will be the Post Office, as it administers these matters. However, I can confirm that we are in the process of appointing an independent forensic investigator to look into the Capture software and how the Post Office addressed concerns about...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1202
House
House of Lords

On the issue of credibility, the people who have been affected by the scandal will want the Post Office to have no connection whatever with any investigation. Does the Minister think it would be a good idea to ignore the fact that the Post Office needs to be involved and...

Member
Lord Watts (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1202
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for that. That is exactly the intention of the independent investigator.

I turn to the amendment on Post Office governance. Amendment 19 is in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Holmes of Richmond, and I thank him again for his engagement on the Bill. Post...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
838 c1202
House
House of Lords