Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,519 results for subject:"Armed forces"

Subject X
Taliban

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Taliban (2,519)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords statement on a significant data protection breach from February 2022 relating to the Afghan relocations and assistance policy.

Lead member
Lord Coaker
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1837-1852
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the Minister for taking the time to speak with me extensively before the Statement. I thank him and his colleague, the Secretary of State for Defence in the other place, for the tone they have adopted. I join the Secretary of State and...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1841-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister and to the Minister for the Armed Forces for a briefing yesterday. It meant that, temporarily, I was under a super-injunction. I was a little surprised when I was summoned to the MoD. On Monday afternoon I received a message asking me...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1842-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baronesses, Lady Goldie and Lady Smith, for their comments and their words about the way in which the Government tried to inform His Majesty’s Opposition and the defence spokesperson for the Liberal Democrats. We tried to ensure that as many Members of your Lordships’...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1844-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1846
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1846
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1846
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if the reporting is correct, I understand that the date of the super-injunction was 1 September 2023 and that it was granted at the instigation of the then Defence Secretary, Grant Shapps. Eight months later, in debates on the safety of Rwanda Bill, I repeatedly moved an amendment...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1846
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for his question. My understanding—and there are better lawyers in here than I—is that the Ministers would have believed themselves to be subject to the injunction and the super-injunction, and that would constrain what they would or would not be able to say. But now...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1846
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it has been stated again and again that the person responsible for the loss of data thought that the spreadsheet contained a small number of names, whereas it actually contained

a very large number of names. Surely this is irrelevant. It is the fact that it was used...

Member
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1846
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble and gallant Lord for this important question, which the noble Baronesses, Lady Smith and Lady Goldie, also asked, as to how on earth this could have happened. First of all, it was really important to ascertain whether there was any criminal or malign intent. The previous...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1847
House
House of Lords

My Lords, yesterday, the Secretary of State for Defence described the super-injunction as

“unprecedented, uncomfortable and, in many ways, unconscionable

”. —[Official Report, Commons, 15/7/25; col. 160.]

Given that, does the Minister agree that if, in the future, super-injunctions are sought, or their renewal is sought, the application will be made only with...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1847
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Viscount, with his legal understanding and background, makes an interesting point. I cannot confirm whether that would be the right process and way forward but it is certainly something that should be thought about and considered. I will ensure that that suggestion is put into the...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1847
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend and Min AF for their briefing to me yesterday in my role as chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee. At that briefing, Min AF said that Defence Intelligence undertook an assessment of those individuals who were at risk. We now know from...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1847
House
House of Lords

My noble friend, as chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee, points to its important role. I would think that every report should be made available to the committee, given that it was set up specifically to give parliamentary scrutiny to difficult intelligence decisions, but under the protection of the...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1848
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are those in the other place who are spreading misinformation about the nature of the checks that were undertaken for those coming from Afghanistan to the United Kingdom. It is in the Statement, but it would be helpful for the House—and the public—if the Minister could reassure...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1848
House
House of Lords

Indeed. Under both the previous Government and this Government, the fact that you are deemed eligible with respect to the Afghan resettlement programme does not mean that you do not have security checks made upon you. Let me be clear: that is for everybody who is said to be eligible...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1848
House
House of Lords

I think noble Lords in this House would agree that the last Government and this Government acted properly in handling this, in every

substantive respect. Unfortunately, that is not how this case, at least in part, is being presented in the media. Part of the media is still presenting this...

Member
Lord Tyrie (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1848
House
House of Lords

As I said to the noble Baroness, Lady Smith, and others, the last Government acted in good faith in a way that they believed would protect people who had been put at risk by the data breach. They also went to the court for an injunction. The court itself granted...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1849
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the logic behind the basic injunction to protect these vulnerable people in the wake of a catastrophic data breach is understandable and the application is laudable; the super-injunction is less so. Is my noble friend the Minister able to open up a little more? Has he been briefed...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1849
House
House of Lords