Skip to main content

1-20 of 416 results for subject:"Transitional arrangements"

Subject X
European Council

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
European Council (416)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

This paper provides an update on the UK-EU future relationship negotiations following intensified negotiations in June and July 2020. It explores the prospects for an agreement in time for the end of the post-Brexit transition period on 31 December

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
4 August 2020
Reference
CBP-8977

The EU has agreed to extend Article 50 a second time. This could delay Brexit until 31 October 2019. This has implications for the UK while it remains in the EU, and could also impact on decisions taken within the EU over the next few months

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
17 April 2019
Reference
CBP-8549
Deposited by
Cabinet Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
9 January 2019
Reference
DEP2019-0036
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

The Brexit talks are not about my interests; they are about the national interest and the interests of the whole of the United Kingdom. Serving our national interest will demand that we hold our nerve through these last stages of the negotiations—the hardest part of all. It will mean not...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 cc47-9
House
House of Commons

I thank the Prime Minister for the advance copy of her statement, and I am pleased she has condemned the horrific murder of Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul. But condemnation is not enough; what matters now is what action the Government are prepared to take. Will they...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 cc49-50
House
House of Commons

I am sure the whole House would love to hear the Government’s precise and detailed blueprint. Perhaps when she returns to the Dispatch Box, the Prime Minister could set out her plan. The whole country is waiting for a plan that works for Britain, not another fudge—kicking the can down...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 c50
House
House of Commons

There was an awful lot in the right hon. Gentleman’s comments about process, but not much about substance, and what Labour actually wants to see. It is incumbent on all of us in public life to be careful about the language we use. There are passionate beliefs and views on...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 cc50-1
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend has stated:

“We will not have truly left the European Union”—

I emphasise the words “truly” and “left the European Union”—

“if we are not in control of our own laws.”

Chequers is still on the table. Its common rulebook allows the other 27 EU countries in their Council of...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 c51
House
House of Commons

May I say to my hon. Friend that, yes, we have proposed that common rulebook? They are rules that our manufacturers say that they will be abiding by in any case. It has been a pretty stable rulebook for many years. However, it is not correct to say that there...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 c51
House
House of Commons

I thank the Prime Minister for advance notice of her statement today. I share with her the remarks that she

made about the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, but may I say that the time has come to take action against Saudi Arabia? Prime Minister, stop arms sales to Saudi Arabia....

Member
Ian Blackford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 cc51-2
House
House of Commons

Let me say to the right hon. Gentleman, as I said in response to the Leader of the Opposition, that I think it is important that those of us in public life all consider the language that we use.

There seemed to be some confusion in what the right hon. Gentleman...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 cc52-3
House
House of Commons

What advantages does the Prime Minister expect to get in the future partnership arrangement that will be better than leaving and spending the £39 billion at home, with a huge boost to our economy and public services?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 c53
House
House of Commons

I believe that a future partnership that protects jobs and ensures that we have a good trading relationship with the European Union is worth negotiating for and worth achieving for the United Kingdom. There are many who say to me in this House that we want to ensure that we...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 c53
House
House of Commons

I add my condemnation of the abuse directed at the Prime Minister. The Sunday Times, and The Times this morning, reported that Whitehall, including the Brexit Department, is now carrying out contingency planning for a people’s vote. Can the Prime Minister elaborate and confirm that this has ministerial endorsement?

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 c53
House
House of Commons

No, that is not correct. The Government do not support a second referendum.

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 c54
House
House of Commons

Does the Prime Minister accept that should her deal fail to secure support in this House with no further road left in negotiations, so that there is parliamentary gridlock, the only and inevitable way forward—whether we like it or not—will be to allow people to decide via either a second...

Member
Justine Greening (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 c54
House
House of Commons

I recognise from other questions that my right hon. Friend has asked me that there is a difference of view between us on the issue of a second referendum. The people voted in 2016—they had that people’s vote—and they decided to leave the European Union. I believe it is our...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 c54
House
House of Commons

Our position is that the backstop is not necessary, and that it is damaging. The EU has made it clear that the backstop is designed to keep Northern Ireland as part of the customs union territory of the EU. The Prime Minister gave an assurance in the withdrawal agreement that...

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 c54
House
House of Commons

We did put that out in the joint report, and we stand by what we put in that joint report. It is precisely that suggestion from the European Union—that Northern Ireland be kept in a customs union while the rest of the United Kingdom has a different relationship with the...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 c54
House
House of Commons

I join other colleagues in utterly condemning the use of language that we saw at the weekend, in the fond hope that we will not see any such language in the future. At the start of the Prime Minister’s statement, she talked about the work that had been done on...

Member
Amber Rudd (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2018
Reference
648 c54
House
House of Commons