Skip to main content

1-20 of 187 results for subject:Science

Subject X
Department of Trade and Industry

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Main estimates 2007-08. Third estimates day (part one). Motion that, for the year ending with 31st March 2008, for expenditure by the Department of Trade and Industry— (1) further resources, not exceeding £4,098,506,000, be authorised for use as set out in House of Commons Paper No. 438, (2) a further...

Lead member
Lord Willis of Knaresborough
Answering member
Ian Pearson
Department
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Estimates days
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1205-49
House
House of Commons

Is it not important that any evidence that is relied on has been peer reviewed? Some years ago, I was involved in attempts to ban high-dose supplements of vitamin B6. In that case, there were merely one or two publications of non-peer reviewed research.

Member
Brian Iddon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1235
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend asks me a difficult question, which I cannot answer, but I am sure that the advice came from a plethora of organisations. I have forgotten exactly which one was responsible for the advice about the bird coming from Hungary. As I was saying, the RSC was critical...

Member
Brian Iddon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1230-3
House
House of Commons

It is a great pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Esher and Walton (Mr. Taylor). I also congratulate the Minister of State, Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills, my hon. Friend the Member for Dudley, South (Ian Pearson), on acquiring the role of Minister responsible for science and innovation....

Member
Brian Iddon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1227-30
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend find it rather strange that Galileo was prevented from making progress by the religious people of his day, and that the stem cell scientists have almost been prevented from making progress by the same group of people?

Member
Brian Iddon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1219
House
House of Commons

Have not the British media damaged the British industry? Compared with the American, Chinese and Indian industries, we have lost out because the British media have damaged the British industry.

Member
Brian Iddon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1216
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for being generous and giving way again. Does he recognise that the lay public’s understanding of scientific matters can also have a commercial knock-on effect? For example, tons of blueberries have been sold over the past couple of years, because they were thought to be...

Member
Angela Watkinson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1226
House
House of Commons

I am curious about the issue, because obviously, I was not part of the debate at the time. When a Minister has such a high-profile role in the wider debate, what is the hon. Gentleman’s feeling about that sort of message coming from those in politics and Government towards the...

Member
Bill Wiggin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1216
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has detailed knowledge of that subject, and is probably the leading expert on it in the House. He is right to highlight that it is important that when the Government or any other policy maker produce a policy and publish the evidence, there must be a statement...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1235
House
House of Commons

I certainly agree with the hon. Gentleman about the health risks of cannabis, but the classification of drugs is not based solely on health risks. Otherwise, as our report makes clear, we would have had strong words to say about alcohol and cigarettes. However, the message to which the hon....

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1234-5
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Minister to his new brief. I think he will find it very exciting, and I look forward to discussing scientific matters with him both formally and informally. I have been my party’s science spokesman for some years, during Lord Sainsbury’s time and that of the Minister’s predecessor,...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1233-4
House
House of Commons

That is a good example of the need to be careful about the quality of scientific advice. What concerns us is not the toxicity of cannabis but the message that is conveyed to members of the public, particularly those who are unwise enough to use such substances and who may...

Member
Bill Wiggin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1234
House
House of Commons

Can my hon. Friend enlighten me about the number of scientists or outside groups that advised the Government on the recent avian flu outbreak at the Bernard Matthews plant in Suffolk? Were all those groups united, different or what—and who came up with the idea that it was a wild...

Member
Ian Gibson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1230
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right that food scares can create shifts in the market. When I was a Minister, I had to react to a headline that said something to the effect that ““Grapefruit is a killer””. Not surprisingly, grapefruit sales plummeted. I looked into the matter and found that...

Member
Ian Taylor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1226-7
House
House of Commons

The programme is going on at the moment; it will be fully evaluated, and no doubt all the findings will be published. I want to make a point about the Sciencewise strategy group, chaired by Professor Kathy Sykes from Bristol university, which is providing advice on the objectives and scope...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1247-9
House
House of Commons

I do not agree; there is a difference between the trust one places in NGOs and the trust that one is obliged to place in the Government. The focus of today’s debate has been the need to ensure that the Government receive the best possible advice. Ultimately, they have the...

Member
Bill Wiggin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1242
House
House of Commons

I begin by thanking all the Members who expressed their good wishes to me in my new role as Minister for science. I am grateful to the hon. Member for Harrogate and Knaresborough (Mr. Willis) for introducing the debate, and thank him for his warm welcome to the new Department...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1242-7
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman not agree that the ability to repeat data is an essential aspect of science? One piece of published work is not enough; there must be several different attacks on a problem, and several, possibly contradictory, papers must be produced. In such situations, the problem arises of...

Member
Ian Gibson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1235
House
House of Commons

I was going to say that that is part of the nature of science: the situation is never clear because there are always new publications that refine the current view. That is not well understood by the public and the media. However, we need not despair and blame scientists that...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1235-6
House
House of Commons

For the avoidance of ambiguity, will the hon. Gentleman confirm that he is referring to government with a small ““g””, thereby including the last Conservative Government to which Lord May—as he now is—was chief scientific adviser, and with whom I worked closely?

Member
Ian Taylor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2007
Reference
462 c1236
House
House of Commons