Skip to main content

1-20 of 29 results for subject:Software

Subject X
Time limits

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Treasury; Whips Office (Lords)
Type
Deposited papers
Date
9 May 2019
Reference
DEP2019-0541
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to introduce the Economic Affairs Finance Bill Sub-Committee’s report on the powers of HMRC. Perhaps I will leave those who do not wish their tax affairs to be considered to leave the Chamber.

In this debate we are considering two reports from the committee: The Powers of...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc782-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a matter of great regret to me that, because Brexit is such a dominant issue in our politics, I often find myself in opposition to my noble friend Lord Forsyth. It is therefore a great pleasure to be able to say how much I admire the...

Member
Lord Tugendhat (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc789-790
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to take part in this debate. It allows me to place on record my admiration for my noble friend Lord Forsyth’s insightful chairmanship of the Finance Bill Sub-Committee, in which I had the honour to take part. I fully support what my noble friend...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc790-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is very good that we have an opportunity today to debate the two excellent reports produced by the Economic Affairs Committee under the chairmanship of my noble friend Lord Forsyth of Drumlean. I congratulate my noble friend on the sub-committee’s reports and on securing this debate today.

Your...

Member
Viscount Trenchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc793-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I gravely miss the noble Lord, Lord Bates, but I understand why someone might want to walk a very long way to avoid having to answer this debate. It is a pleasure to see the noble Lord, Lord Young of Cookham, in his place. I first bumped into...

Member
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc796-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I must declare an interest: for a time in the late 1970s, I was standing counsel to the Inland Revenue on my old circuit. I am

sorry that I am going to be critical of those who once fed me. I declare a second interest, which we all...

Member
Lord Judge (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc798-801
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to the noble Baroness, and very interested in what she says. As she may recall, we did ask officials at HMRC whether any people involved with it had been involved in a loan charge. At first, the question was not answered. Then, on the second or...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 c803
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the noble Lord, Lord Young. He has a somewhat challenging baptism in replying to this first debate in his new position. We all know his competence and that he always wins considerable support from the House for how he presents his arguments. However, I can scarcely...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc804-5
House
House of Lords

Of course, the noble Lord is quite right about the substantial cuts in the resources available to HMRC. That has undoubtedly been a factor in its ability to deal with inquiries and to deal with people sensitively. However, it is not to blame for implementing the loan charge, which was...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 c805
House
House of Lords

The answer is categorically yes. In fact, I was going to develop that argument briefly but I do not need to now: in his opening speech, the noble Lord made the main charge against the Government and their response to the report thus far quite clear. I utterly endorse that...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc805-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Forsyth for introducing this debate, and for agreeing to reschedule it from its previous slot, which would have been at a less civilised hour. I also thank the Economic Affairs Committee, for their two detailed reports, and all noble Lords who have...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc807-8
House
House of Lords

On the subject of the scrutiny in Committee on the Finance Bill in the other place, I think I am right in saying that there was a speech from a Minister, a speech from the Opposition and two other speeches. None of the issues about retrospection et cetera was raised....

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 c808
House
House of Lords

I am sure that if my noble friend and I had been on the Finance Bill at the time, we might have raised some of the issues that he has now raised. I make the point again that the legislation went through all its stages in the other place after...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc808-9
House
House of Lords

With respect to the noble Baroness, the unanimous decision of the Supreme Court was that the tax was due and is payable by the employee and not the employer. I will come on to the employer in a moment. I was about to disappoint the noble Lord, Lord Kerr, on...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 c809
House
House of Lords

I apologise for interrupting my noble friend again, but there are two points here. The court proceeding he referred to was the Rangers case, which said that liability was with the employer. The point that my noble friend Lord Kerr was making was that this is treated as an emolument...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 c809
House
House of Lords

My understanding is that the tax now due accrued over a period of time, and was payable in the year in which it was accrued. That has been consolidated and crystallised into the loan charge. If I am wrong, I will write to my noble friend.

The Government are committed to...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc809-810
House
House of Lords

The safest thing I can do is repeat what I just said: HMRC will seek to collect the loan charge from employers in the first instance, and will pursue individuals for the tax due only where it cannot reasonably do so from the employer; for example, if the employer is...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc810-1
House
House of Lords

I was not aware. Of course, I understand the sensitivities of the issue and will raise the matter with HMRC.

HMRC has introduced simplified payment arrangements for those who approached it to settle by 5 April this year so that individuals will not have to pay the loan charge. Regardless of...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 cc811-2
House
House of Lords

I am quite sure that the House will be very willing to extend considerable injury time to the Minister if he would be prepared to tell us not just what the boilerplate says but what he actually thinks.

Member
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2019
Reference
797 c812
House
House of Lords