Skip to main content

1-20 of 273 results for subject:Misrepresentation

Subject X
Interest rate hedging products

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Interest rate hedging products (273)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Allegations that banks put hidden credit lines in business loans, leading to business failures, will be debated in Westminster Hall on 14 April 2026.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
10 April 2026
Reference
CBP-10602

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the Financial Conduct Authority in dealing with complaints relating to the misselling of interest rate swaps.

Asked by
Christian Matheson (Labour)
Answering body
HM Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 October 2015
Reference
10921
House
House of Commons

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent discussions he has had with the Financial Conduct Authority on the misselling of interest rate swaps.

Asked by
Christian Matheson (Labour)
Answering body
HM Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 October 2015
Reference
10922
House
House of Commons

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will investigate the conduct of RBS in relation to interest rate mis-selling to customers deemed to be sophisticated.

Asked by
Gary Streeter (Conservative)
Answering body
HM Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2015
Reference
6700
House
House of Commons

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what provision his Department has made in the sales prospectus for RBS shares for the cost of litigation (a) that has commenced and (b) that complainants have given notice of their plans to commence in respect of interest rate swap mis-selling.

Asked by
Guto Bebb (Conservative)
Answering body
HM Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 2015
Reference
5085
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the Financial Conduct Authority’s redress scheme, adopted as a result of the mis-selling of complex interest rate derivatives to small and medium sized businesses, and has found the scheme’s implementation to be lacking in consistency and basic fairness; considers such failures to...

Member
Guto Bebb (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 c477
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend, but my constituent John Kidd has so far spent 74 weeks battling the FCA when ideally it should take 12 weeks. My hon. Friend must not be too kind to the FCA.

Member
Bill Wiggin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 c477
House
House of Commons

I agree entirely. The time scales of some of the redress offers have been completely unacceptable. Indeed, at the scheme’s outset there was a six-month

delay in order to ensure a consistency of approach across the 11 banks that volunteered to be part of it. One of the concerns I...

Member
Guto Bebb (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 cc477-8
House
House of Commons

This is, of course, a voluntary arrangement that has been entered into. Does my hon. Friend think it would have been better if it had been a statutory agreement, which would have led to much more transparency?

Member
Lord Sharma (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 c478
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a very important and interesting point. There was a need at the outset to ensure that the issue of redress was addressed as quickly as possible and it was felt that a voluntary scheme would do that without the need for a fully judicial process. However,...

Member
Guto Bebb (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 c478
House
House of Commons

On consistency, it is hard to see exactly what the difference is between an embedded swap and a separate swap that is tied to a loan agreement. Is that an issue of concern to my hon. Friend, and what does he think could be done to improve it?

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 c478
House
House of Commons

I am sure my hon. and learned Friend’s point will be supported by thousands of businesses that feel they have been excluded from the scheme. They might not think that it is working properly, but they do feel that they should have been included. That exclusion has not been explained...

Member
Guto Bebb (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 c478
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to my hon. Friend for all the work he has been doing on this issue with others across the House. One of my constituents, Heather Buchanan, and her husband have, happily, got redress, but they are now in a major battle about consequential losses. Does my hon....

Member
Michael Moore (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 c478
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for that intervention. The issue of consequential losses is of significant concern, because when the FCA redress scheme was established it clearly said that consequential losses would be dealt

with on the basis of accepted legal principles, and yet of the £310 million-worth of consequential losses that...

Member
Guto Bebb (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 cc478-9
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has been a stalwart campaigner on this issue and deserves great credit. On transparency, is there not a question about whether those reviewers, the review process and the reports they provide are truly independent? Constituents of mine who have been caught up in this have not received...

Member
Marcus Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 c479
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his intervention and agree with his rather depressing analysis, because my second point is that there is a concern about the significant lack of consistency on redress among the banks. We have to draw the attention of the House to the accusation...

Member
Guto Bebb (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 cc479-480
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for giving way again—he is being very generous. Does he agree that the FCA should look for consistency rather than simply come to us as constituency MPs when we raise issues and tell us, in effect, that it agrees with a bank’s independent reviewer without...

Member
Marcus Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 c480
House
House of Commons

I could not agree more. Put simply, the regulator should be regulating its own redress scheme. It is simply not good enough for the FCA consistently to say that the decision has been approved by the independent reviewer if there are doubts about their behaviour.

Member
Guto Bebb (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 c480
House
House of Commons

I, too, congratulate the hon. Gentleman on bringing this issue to the House’s attention. The only thing that is consistent and transparent is that the banks that caused the financial crash are profiting from selling products such as interest rate hedging products, which were bought by a company in my...

Member
Steve Rotheram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 c480
House
House of Commons

Of course not. The whole reason behind establishing the redress scheme is to try to deal with the wrongdoing of the banks. My concern is that the scheme has not succeeded as expected.

Member
Guto Bebb (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2014
Reference
589 c480
House
House of Commons