Skip to main content

1-20 of 106 results for subject:Liability

Session X
2022-23
Subject X
Fines

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Fines (106)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 2D.

This House has been asked these questions before and twice this House has said no with an overwhelming majority. We are asked to consider for a third time an amendment that significantly expands on previous versions that have already...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c712
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister spell out exactly how trade unions are to comply with and enforce a code that is outwith their jurisdictions in making workers go into work?

Member
Rachael Maskell (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c713
House
House of Commons

The code of practice will be consulted on so that all parties are clear about what the obligations of the unions will be. We expect them to be quite straightforward. They have been debated at length, along with various ideas about how this might operate.

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c713
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Rachael Maskell (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c713
House
House of Commons

I want to end my speech shortly, but I will give the hon. Lady one last chance to intervene.

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c713
House
House of Commons

As has been pointed out on numerous occasions, the measures that the Minister is trying to introduce are outside the jurisdictions of trade unions, which therefore do not have the powers to implement them.

Member
Rachael Maskell (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c713
House
House of Commons

As I have said, we intend to consult with all parties to make sure that they have a chance to comment on what reasonable obligations a union might be required to take. I think that it is pretty straightforward, and, indeed, unions will be familiar with the code of practice...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c713
House
House of Commons

If the Minister is so willing to consult, why is he rejecting an amendment which confirms that there should be a consultation?

Member
Alan Brown (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c713
House
House of Commons

We are not happy with a number of other parts of the amendment. We are proposing a measure that we have already proposed in earlier debates. It is, of course, up to those in the other place to decide how they take their amendments forward, but we believe that this...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c713
House
House of Commons

I draw the House’s attention to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests.

Let me repeat, at the outset, our opposition to the Bill and our intention to repeal the Act that it will become should we be in a position to do so in the future. It is...

Member
Justin Madders (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 cc713-6
House
House of Commons

I am sorry to interrupt my hon. Friend when he is in full flow but, as he is developing his argument on the need for

consultation and impact assessments, has he been able to clarify with the Government what happens if an employer refuses to comply? In London, for example,...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c715
House
House of Commons

That is a very good question. My understanding—no doubt the Minister can correct me if I am wrong—is that it is still up to the employer to determine what work notices it issues, which makes the Bill a little ludicrous.

All these consultation papers, all these impact assessments, and we are...

Member
Justin Madders (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c717
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has just made a valid point, because when NHS Employers and the NHS Confederation came before the Select Committee on Health and Social Care, they said that they did not want any of this legislation. Presumably, following that logic, they will not have to issue minimum service...

Member
Rachael Maskell (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c717
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for her intervention. That is why it would have been so interesting to see what the consultation responses were to the draft regulations, because those might have told us whether employers were saying, “Don’t do this; we don’t think it is going to work.” We...

Member
Justin Madders (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 cc717-8
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the shadow Minister, the hon. Member for Ellesmere Port and Neston (Justin Madders). I agree with all his comments, but I hope that Labour stays resolute on this. If it comes into government, we do not want to see another U-turn, given what we...

Member
Alan Brown (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c718
House
House of Commons

Does it not speak volumes about the way in which this Government conduct their business that they go through a consultation process and are not prepared to publish the results of that consultation? What have they got to hide?

Member
Andy McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c718
House
House of Commons

That is a fair point. Obviously, I cannot answer on what the Government have to hide, other than to say that we know about a raft of answers that show how unworkable and prejudiced this Bill is.

Subsection 5(b) in the amendment is about consulting the ILO. The Government keep telling...

Member
Alan Brown (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 cc718-9
House
House of Commons

The Minister has let the cat out of the bag in relation to the Government’s attitude to this dreadful Bill and to amendment 2D from the other place. The Minister objected to Lords amendment 2D because it would delay the implementation of the Bill. Let us be clear: the Bill...

Member
Richard Burgon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 cc719-720
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

8.45 pm

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c720
House
House of Commons

The Minister shakes his head. If what I am saying is not true, why does he not take that measure out of the Bill, so that workers cannot be sacked for not complying with work notices? That is in the legislation. I shall be charitable to the Minister. Having listened...

Member
Richard Burgon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c720
House
House of Commons