Skip to main content

1-20 of 404 results for house:"House of Lords"

Session X
2014-15
Subject X
Medical treatments

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Medical treatments (404)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what recent steps they have taken to improve the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation.

Asked by
Lord Black of Brentwood (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
HL5882
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have asked NHS England whether it will rationalise the number of committees concerned with assessing the funding of treatments for patients with rare diseases.

Asked by
Lord Turnberg (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 March 2015
Reference
HL5850
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to ensure that commissioning routes in respect of treatment for ultra-rare diseases are as quick and thorough as possible.

Asked by
Baroness Masham of Ilton (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 March 2015
Reference
HL5910
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary Theresa May
Department
Home Office
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
SI 2015/704
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Jeremy Hunt
Department
Department of Health
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
SI 2015/570
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

My Lords, this instrument is being made to include amphetamine with a limit of 250 micrograms per litre of blood in the new drug-driving offence of driving with a specified drug in the body above a specified limit. The new offence was made in the Crime and Courts Act 2013,...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 cc223-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, all of us will welcome these new regulations, which my noble friend presents. We know already that there are two patterns; the first is that of those who have been prescribed amphetamine medically, whose level will almost certainly be under 200 micrograms per litre of blood tested; the...

Member
Earl of Dundee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c225GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her explanation of the order, which specifies amphetamine as a controlled drug for the purposes of drug-driving and sets a limit above which it will be an offence to drive. We support the order but I have one or two questions about the Explanatory Memorandum—which,...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 cc225-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister gave a very interesting outline to the order and, as usual, the noble Lord, Lord Rosser, asked some very interesting questions. I do not intend to ask any further questions but, purely out of academic interest, it may amuse the Minister to learn that last week...

Member
Viscount Simon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c227GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, thank you very much. I shall talk through the questions in reverse order, with the latest being freshest in my mind. I can say to the noble Viscount, Lord Simon, that the cost of these screening devices is around £16 or £17—obviously there is some variation in price....

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 cc227-8GC
House
House of Lords

My point was that if the conclusion was reached in September 2014 or shortly afterwards that there was no need for a third formal consultation, why have we waited until now to have this order? The second consultation was apparently conducted between 17 December 2013 and 3 January 2014, in...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c228GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Rosser, asked why we were not at 50 rather than 250 micrograms, what risk there is because we are going with the higher limit and how we got there. Having consulted on these issues twice, it became very evident that there were complex issues involved in...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c229GC
House
House of Lords

Is the argument that if one fixes the limit at 50 micrograms, one is liable to be in a situation where the driving of an individual who is sticking to that limit is likely to be more impaired, for the reasons the Minister just mentioned, than if the limit is...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c229GC
House
House of Lords

It is only part of the argument because that would be true for ADHD patients. We took the issues back to the expert panel, which clarified that the point at which driving risk becomes significant with amphetamine is 270 micrograms. We did not want to set a line at 270....

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 cc229-230GC
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to my noble friend. I am interested to hear about that process from which, as she points out, sooner or later there will some analysis. That will help us to know what is good about it. Are any other states doing the same or are we...

Member
Earl of Dundee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 cc230-1GC
House
House of Lords

I cannot properly answer that question. Certainly we are one of the leading countries in telematics. I will be glad to write to my noble friend to cover these issues, which are of interest, significance and importance.

My noble friend Lord Dundee also raised the question of international standards and the...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c231GC
House
House of Lords

On the issue of international efforts, comparisons and best practice, the technical committee of the World Health Organization is to do with substances. The DRUID project’s focus may be wider—I do not know. It might simply be to encourage a comparison of notes to reduce accidents in whatever way that...

Member
Earl of Dundee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c231GC
House
House of Lords

I think we have exhausted my capacity for guidance. However, these are important issues. My noble friend is right, the international exchange of information is always significant: we learn from others and share what we learn with others. There is satisfaction in being praised by the WHO for the direction...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c232GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may establish whether I have understood the point correctly. We support the order and are not opposing it. We have discussed the issue of amphetamine being taken for medical reasons, but do I take it that the Government’s position in relation to people who are not taking it...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c232GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Rosser, has accurately reflected the circumstances. The advice that we received ultimately from the expert panel after sifting through all the evidence it received is that 270 micrograms per litre of blood moves an individual into the serious risk environment. Therefore, setting the limit at 250...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c232GC
House
House of Lords