1-20 of 2,997 results for subject:"Armed forces"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.295 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.012 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Armed forces"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Armed forces" OR subject_t:"Military forces" OR subject_ses:90249
Type
House
Session
More
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what proportion of armed services personnel were registered to vote in each of the last thirty years.
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what proportion of armed services personnel were registered to vote in each of the last thirty years.
The information requested is not held centrally.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of (a) Army, (b) Royal Navy and (c) Royal Air Force personnel of each rank have been in breach of their harmony guidelines in each year since 2010.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of (a) Army, (b) Royal Navy and (c) Royal Air Force personnel of each rank have been in breach of their harmony guidelines in each year since 2010.
The “Harmony Guidelines” are used by the Services to strike a balance between deployment, training and time with families. Individual Harmony Guidelines (IHG) are different for the three Services, equating to no more than 660 days away from home over a rolling three year period for the Naval Service, no more than 415 days away in a 30-month rolling period for the Army and no more than 280 days away over in the previous 24 months for the Royal Air Force.
The following tables show the information available in respect of breaches of harmony guidelines, by percentage in each year, by rank, since 2010 to the latest date available (1 January 2014 for the RAF or 1 March 2014 for the Naval Service and the Army).
| Naval
Service | |||||
| Percentage
of personnel in breach of
IHG | |||||
| 1
April
2010 | 1
April
2011 | 1
April
2012 | 1
April
2013 | 1
March
2014 | |
| Officers: | |||||
| OF-9 | 1— | 1— | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| OF-8 | 1— | 1— | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| OF-7 | 1— | 1— | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| OF-6 | 1— | 1— | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0 |
| OF-5 | 1— | 1— | 0 | 2— | 2— |
| OF-4 | 1— | 1— | 2— | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| OF-3 | 1— | 1— | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| OF-2 | 1— | 1— | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| OF-1 | 1— | 1— | 2— | 2— | 2— |
| Total | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| Ratings: | |||||
| OR-9 | 1— | 1— | 2— | 2— | 2— |
| OR-8 | 1— | 1— | 2— | 2— | 2— |
| OR-7 | 1— | 1— | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| OR-6 | 1— | 1— | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| OR-4 | 1— | 1— | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| OR-3 | 1— | 1— | 2— | 2.7 | 2.6 |
| OR-2 | 1— | 1— | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| Total | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| 1
Data is not
available. 2 Numbers 5 or below. |
| Army | |||||
| Percentage
of personnel in breach of
IHG | |||||
| 1
April
2010 | 1
April
2011 | 1
April
2012 | 1
April
2013 | 1
March
2014 | |
| Officers: | |||||
| OF-9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| OF-8 | 0 | 0 | 11.1 | 10.0 | 0 |
| OF-7 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 5.1 |
| OF-6 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.5 |
| OF-5 | 5.0 | 5.7 | 5.1 | 3.4 | 2.7 |
| OF-4 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| OF-3 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 1.3 |
| OF-2 | 6.8 | 6.4 | 8.2 | 7.9 | 6.7 |
| OF-1 | 4.7 | 9.2 | 8.1 | 5.6 | 2.9 |
| Total | 4.6 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 3.4 |
| Soldiers: | |||||
| OR-9 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| OR-8 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 1.8 |
| OR-7 | 4.9 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 3.0 |
| OR-6 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 5.4 | 4.9 | 4.9 |
| OR-4 | 7.2 | 6.6 | 8.1 | 8.2 | 8.6 |
| OR-3 | 8.2 | 6.9 | 7.5 | 7.9 | 8.1 |
| OR-2 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Total | 5.8 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Royal
Air
Force | |||||
| Percentage
of personnel in breach of
IHG | |||||
| 1
April
2010 | 1
April
2011 | 1
April
2012 | 1
April
2013 | 1
January
2014 | |
| Officers: | |||||
| OF-9 | 1— | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| OF-8 | 1— | 11.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| OF-7 | 1— | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| OF-6 | 1— | 9.0 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 9.0 |
| OF-5 | 1— | 3.7 | 0.6 | 4.2 | 3.3 |
| OF-4 | 1— | 3.9 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 2.8 |
| OF-3 | 1— | 2.9 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 |
| OF-2 | 1— | 3.0 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.0 |
| OF-1 | 1— | 1.8 | 2.1 | 4.4 | 6.8 |
| Total | 3.6 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 3.1 |
| Other
Ranks: | |||||
| OR-9 | 1— | 1.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| OR-8 | 1— | 2— | 2— | 2— | 2— |
| OR-7 | 1— | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| OR-6 | 1— | 2.2 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
| OR-4 | 1— | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 4.0 |
| OR-3 | 1— | 1— | 31.8 | 22.1 | 33.8 |
| OR-1
and
2 | 1— | 2.6 | 3.6 | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Total | 2.9 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 4.2 |
| 1
Data is not
available. 2 Rank does not exist in the RAF. Notes: 1. The increase in breaches on Individual Harmony for the RAF is primarily due to RAF operational tours changing from four to six months and the Harmony metrics having not yet been adjusted. Adjusted Individual Harmony metrics will take effect from financial year 2014-15, aligned to the increased tour lengths, and are expected to show a decrease in the percentage of RAF personnel breaching Individual Harmony. 2. The percentages are for Trained UK Regular Forces. Army equivalent ranks as listed in the tables: OF-9 General OF-8 Lieutenant General OF-7 Major General OF-6 Brigadier OF-5 Colonel OF-4 Lieutenant Colonel OF-3 Major OF-2 Captain OF-1 Lieutenant OR-9 WO1 OR-8 WO2 OR-7 Staff Sergeant OR-6 Sergeant OR-4 Corporal OR-3 Lance Corporal OR-2 Private |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many administrative actions under AGAI67 have been considered to have been illegal punishments in each year since 2008 in each branch of the armed forces; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many administrative actions under AGAI67 have been considered to have been illegal punishments in each year since 2008 in each branch of the armed forces; and if he will make a statement.
It is assumed that the hon. Member is referring to cases where administrative action was taken, under AGAI Chapter 67 or the equivalent regulations in the Naval Service and RAF, against service personnel who had been in receipt of a simple police caution, after the amendment to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 made by section 49 the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act which came into force on 19 December 2008.
The range of administrative sanctions which could have been applied in such circumstances is extremely wide, ranging from a formal warning to termination of service. A full analysis by year would require the examination of individual records and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
The Prime Minister is well aware of the wonderful work done by the Royal British Legion Battle Back centre with our brave servicemen and women who have been injured in conflict, through adaptive sports and adventurous training. At the end of this month, I will be joining a team from the Battle Back centre with the hon. Members for Bassetlaw (John Mann) and for Chatham and Aylesford (Tracey Crouch) to raise awareness of that wonderful work. Will the Prime Minister wish us every success in that aim?
The Prime Minister is well aware of the wonderful work done by the Royal British Legion Battle Back centre with our brave servicemen and women who have been injured in conflict, through adaptive sports and adventurous training. At the end of this month, I will be joining a team from the Battle Back centre with the hon. Members for Bassetlaw (John Mann) and for Chatham and Aylesford (Tracey Crouch) to raise awareness of that wonderful work. Will the Prime Minister wish us every success in that aim?
I will certainly wish well my hon. Friend and hon. Members from across the House who are taking part in that. The Royal British Legion plays an absolutely key part in our country in standing up for veterans and their interests, and ensuring that we raise money and serve them properly. We work very closely with the Royal British Legion in government, and the Battle Back centre that my hon. Friend mentioned is an extraordinary facility in our country. I wish him well and hope that the fundraising goes well.
I will certainly wish well my hon. Friend and hon. Members from across the House who are taking part in that. The Royal British Legion plays an absolutely key part in our country in standing up for veterans and their interests, and ensuring that we raise money and serve them properly. We work very closely with the Royal British Legion in government, and the Battle Back centre that my hon. Friend mentioned is an extraordinary facility in our country. I wish him well and hope that the fundraising goes well.
I will certainly wish well my hon. Friend and hon. Members from across the House who are taking part in that. The Royal British Legion plays an absolutely key part in our country in standing up for veterans and their interests, and ensuring that we raise money and serve them properly. We work very closely with the Royal British Legion in government, and the Battle Back centre that my hon. Friend mentioned is an extraordinary facility in our country. I wish him well and hope that the fundraising goes well.
The Prime Minister is well aware of the wonderful work done by the Royal British Legion Battle Back centre with our brave servicemen and women who have been injured in conflict, through adaptive sports and adventurous training. At the end of this month, I will be joining a team from the Battle Back centre with the hon. Members for Bassetlaw (John Mann) and for Chatham and Aylesford (Tracey Crouch) to raise awareness of that wonderful work. Will the Prime Minister wish us every success in that aim?
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment his Department has made of the feasibility of replacing live animals with simulators in armed forces trauma training; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment his Department has made of the feasibility of replacing live animals with simulators in armed forces trauma training; and if he will make a statement.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what representations they have made to the government of Israel concerning reports of Christian pilgrims being fired on with tear gas by the Israeli military at the Tomb of Lazarus in East Jerusalem.[HL6952]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what representations they have made to the government of Israel concerning reports of Christian pilgrims being fired on with tear gas by the Israeli military at the Tomb of Lazarus in East Jerusalem.[HL6952]
An official from our Embassy in Tel Aviv raised this incident with an Israel Defence Forces (IDF) spokesperson on 8 May. The spokesperson maintained that the Israeli soldiers did not fire tear gas directly at the pilgrims but at Palestinian protesters nearby who were throwing stones at the IDF soldiers.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what organisations have been funded by his Department to support access to short breaks and respite provision for children, young people and parents in service families and the families of injured servicemen in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what organisations have been funded by his Department to support access to short breaks and respite provision for children, young people and parents in service families and the families of injured servicemen in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the implications for his department's policies of the findings of The Armed Forces & Society survey produced by Lord Ashcroft.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the implications for his department's policies of the findings of The Armed Forces & Society survey produced by Lord Ashcroft.
The Ministry of Defence was grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Ashcroft for conducting what proved to be a very useful survey of the attitudes of the public and the armed forces towards each other. While there were many positive findings, of particular concern
was the perception among a majority of the public that veterans would have physical or mental problems as a result of service. Lord Ashcroft described this as ‘not only untrue, but damaging'.
The 2012 survey provided valuable insight into the relationship between the armed forces and the nation they serve. This relationship is at the heart of the Armed Forces Covenant, which we published in May 2011. A great deal has been achieved through this mechanism in the last few years across a wide range of areas, including health care, accommodation, education, and welfare.
We will go on looking at what more we can do for our armed forces, their families, and Veterans, to ensure that they continue to receive the recognition they deserve, and if necessary, whatever help they may require.
I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many personnel were in the Sea Cadets in Northern Ireland on 1 January 2014.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many personnel were in the Sea Cadets in Northern Ireland on 1 January 2014.
On 1 January 2014 there were 257 Sea Cadets in Northern Ireland, 22 of whom were Royal Marine Cadets.
In addition there were 157 adult volunteers.
All visit requests from hon. and right hon. Members are considered on a case-by-case basis and accommodated if possible. If an hon. Member wishes to visit our armed forces serving at home or abroad, they should write to my right hon. Friend the Defence Secretary giving the purpose of the proposed visit. However, it has been the long-standing policy of the Ministry of Defence, including under the previous Administration, that visits by individual MPs are normally undertaken at their own expense.
All visit requests from hon. and right hon. Members are considered on a case-by-case basis and accommodated if possible. If an hon. Member wishes to visit our armed forces serving at home or abroad, they should write to my right hon. Friend the Defence Secretary giving the purpose of the proposed visit. However, it has been the long-standing policy of the Ministry of Defence, including under the previous Administration, that visits by individual MPs are normally undertaken at their own expense.
What his policy is on hon. Members visiting armed forces serving abroad.
Given the concern about the armed forces review and the prospect of many officers, soldiers and so on losing their jobs, is it not important that, under the military covenant, we do everything possible to resettle returning armed forces personnel? In such circumstances, would it not be appropriate for the Ministry of Defence to approach the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority to see whether it will include MOD destinations among those designated in Europe for one trip a year by MPs?
Given the concern about the armed forces review and the prospect of many officers, soldiers and so on losing their jobs, is it not important that, under the military covenant, we do everything possible to resettle returning armed forces personnel? In such circumstances, would it not be appropriate for the Ministry of Defence to approach the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority to see whether it will include MOD destinations among those designated in Europe for one trip a year by MPs?
May I begin by saying that I have a lot of time for the hon. Lady, having served with her on the Environmental Audit Committee several years ago? I wrote to her in late March about an issue in relation to a visit she had requested, but I am afraid that the position has not changed since then. The funding of individual Members’ travel is ultimately a matter for IPSA. I am willing to talk to IPSA about the matter, but Members will know that I cannot guarantee the outcome.
I pay tribute to the hon. Lady, however, who has shown consistent support for the Mercian Regiment and its predecessors, and that has been reflected back to Ministers by the regiment itself.
May I begin by saying that I have a lot of time for the hon. Lady, having served with her on the Environmental Audit Committee several years ago? I wrote to her in late March about an issue in relation to a visit she had requested, but I am afraid that the position has not changed since then. The funding of individual Members’ travel is ultimately a matter for IPSA. I am willing to talk to IPSA about the matter, but Members will know that I cannot guarantee the outcome.
I pay tribute to the hon. Lady, however, who has shown consistent support for the Mercian Regiment and its predecessors, and that has been reflected back to Ministers by the regiment itself.
May I begin by saying that I have a lot of time for the hon. Lady, having served with her on the Environmental Audit Committee several years ago? I wrote to her in late March about an issue in relation to a visit she had requested, but I am afraid that the position has not changed since then. The funding of individual Members’ travel is ultimately a matter for IPSA. I am willing to talk to IPSA about the matter, but Members will know that I cannot guarantee the outcome.
I pay tribute to the hon. Lady, however, who has shown consistent support for the Mercian Regiment and its predecessors, and that has been reflected back to Ministers by the regiment itself.
Given the concern about the armed forces review and the prospect of many officers, soldiers and so on losing their jobs, is it not important that, under the military covenant, we do everything possible to resettle returning armed forces personnel? In such circumstances, would it not be appropriate for the Ministry of Defence to approach the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority to see whether it will include MOD destinations among those designated in Europe for one trip a year by MPs?
I strongly agree with the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent North (Joan Walley) about the usefulness of hon. Members visiting our armed forces overseas. Does my right hon. Friend the Minister not agree that there is one very useful mechanism for doing so—set up recently with your assistance, Mr Speaker—in the armed forces parliamentary scheme, which was well founded by Sir Neil Thorne and continues. I hope that all hon. Members will consider joining that excellent organisation.
I strongly agree with the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent North (Joan Walley) about the usefulness of hon. Members visiting our armed forces overseas. Does my right hon. Friend the Minister not agree that there is one very useful mechanism for doing so—set up recently with your assistance, Mr Speaker—in the armed forces parliamentary scheme, which was well founded by Sir Neil Thorne and continues. I hope that all hon. Members will consider joining that excellent organisation.
I am very happy, without recourse to IPSA, to pay tribute to the armed forces parliamentary scheme and the valuable work that it does in assisting Members of Parliament, particularly those who do not have previous military experience, to understand better the wonderful work that our armed forces do on our
behalf. I also pay tribute to my hon. Friend for all his work to update and upgrade the AFPS to ensure that it remains fit for the 21st century.
I am very happy, without recourse to IPSA, to pay tribute to the armed forces parliamentary scheme and the valuable work that it does in assisting Members of Parliament, particularly those who do not have previous military experience, to understand better the wonderful work that our armed forces do on our
behalf. I also pay tribute to my hon. Friend for all his work to update and upgrade the AFPS to ensure that it remains fit for the 21st century.
I am very happy, without recourse to IPSA, to pay tribute to the armed forces parliamentary scheme and the valuable work that it does in assisting Members of Parliament, particularly those who do not have previous military experience, to understand better the wonderful work that our armed forces do on our
behalf. I also pay tribute to my hon. Friend for all his work to update and upgrade the AFPS to ensure that it remains fit for the 21st century.
I strongly agree with the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent North (Joan Walley) about the usefulness of hon. Members visiting our armed forces overseas. Does my right hon. Friend the Minister not agree that there is one very useful mechanism for doing so—set up recently with your assistance, Mr Speaker—in the armed forces parliamentary scheme, which was well founded by Sir Neil Thorne and continues. I hope that all hon. Members will consider joining that excellent organisation.
I will certainly raise the issue on our IPSA liaison committee, but can the Minister think of any other parliamentary fees office anywhere in Europe that would be, frankly, so mean and short-sighted as not to fund Members of Parliament to visit their armed forces abroad? That is so typical of IPSA. I very much hope that the whole House will join the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent North (Joan Walley) in her campaign.
I will certainly raise the issue on our IPSA liaison committee, but can the Minister think of any other parliamentary fees office anywhere in Europe that would be, frankly, so mean and short-sighted as not to fund Members of Parliament to visit their armed forces abroad? That is so typical of IPSA. I very much hope that the whole House will join the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent North (Joan Walley) in her campaign.
I understand the point that my hon. Friend is seeking to make. In fairness, neither I nor my ministerial colleagues are responsible for the decisions of IPSA. It sounds as if he is about to launch something of a flanking attack. If he does so, I suspect that some Members of the House may come to his aid.
I understand the point that my hon. Friend is seeking to make. In fairness, neither I nor my ministerial colleagues are responsible for the decisions of IPSA. It sounds as if he is about to launch something of a flanking attack. If he does so, I suspect that some Members of the House may come to his aid.
I understand the point that my hon. Friend is seeking to make. In fairness, neither I nor my ministerial colleagues are responsible for the decisions of IPSA. It sounds as if he is about to launch something of a flanking attack. If he does so, I suspect that some Members of the House may come to his aid.
I will certainly raise the issue on our IPSA liaison committee, but can the Minister think of any other parliamentary fees office anywhere in Europe that would be, frankly, so mean and short-sighted as not to fund Members of Parliament to visit their armed forces abroad? That is so typical of IPSA. I very much hope that the whole House will join the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent North (Joan Walley) in her campaign.
What his policy is on hon. Members visiting armed forces serving abroad.
What his policy is on hon. Members visiting armed forces serving abroad.
All visit requests from hon. and right hon. Members are considered on a case-by-case basis and accommodated if possible. If an hon. Member wishes to visit our armed forces serving at home or abroad, they should write to my right hon. Friend the Defence Secretary giving the purpose of the proposed visit. However, it has been the long-standing policy of the Ministry of Defence, including under the previous Administration, that visits by individual MPs are normally undertaken at their own expense.