Skip to main content

1-20 of 552 results for subject:VAT

Session X
2010-12
Subject X
EU economic policy

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
EU economic policy (552)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I wonder whether my hon. Friend would reflect on the view of many of my constituents, who feel that the Government's reticence in tackling the bonus culture or in tackling the banks in any tangible way has much to do with the number of Members sitting on the Government Benches...

Member
Ian Mearns (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c529
House
House of Commons

The abolition of RDAs will be compensated by the reduction in corporation tax, but how will the Government calculate that? In my constituency of Gateshead, the economy is much diversified compared with the 1980s—there are many fewer large engineering companies and many more technical engineering ones. However, there is no...

Member
Ian Mearns (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c643-4;527 c642
House
House of Commons

But the tax rate was 50% before. Although clause 19 has been agreed to, it ought to have been paid for by the windfall that the Government got because of last year's rise in the barrel price and by the windfall over and above the 2010 forecast that the Government...

Member
Stewart Hosie (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c623
House
House of Commons

Not on the Labour Benches!

Member
Stephen Phillips (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c635;527 c633
House
House of Commons

The ongoing implicit taxpayer guarantee for the banks is very significant. Indeed, I understand that the Bank of England has suggested in its financial stability reports that an implied subsidy of about £100 billion each year offers a safety net for the profitability of the banks. Without that taxpayer guarantee,...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c480
House
House of Commons

Would my hon. Friend be interested, as I am, to find out exactly what the financial value is to the financial services sector of the now implicit Government guarantee that it enjoys? If anything, that should point us towards greater recompense to the taxpayer for that implicit Government guarantee.

Member
Alison McGovern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c480
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is entirely right, and that is why we have to take a step back and look at the context of today's debate. The Government are clearly still on the side of the big banks at a time not just when the living standards and wages of ordinary...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c480-1
House
House of Commons

At a time when Roger Bootle of Deloitte reports that for the first time for four years in a row the real incomes of real people are falling, does my hon. Friend not think it particularly peculiar that the real incomes of bankers—of all people—are likely to rise?

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c480
House
House of Commons

In defending the bank bonus tax and the revenue that would have been raised by continuing with it, what allowance has the hon. Gentleman made for increasing levels of legal tax avoidance by those no-doubt skilful bankers who would have been keen to avoid paying tax under that regime?

Member
Duncan Hames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c480
House
House of Commons

If the reason the hon. Gentleman refuses to advocate a repeat of the bonus tax is that the bankers might have sophisticated accountants who can avoid it, that is a pretty poor state of affairs for this Parliament. We ought to be introducing fair and just taxation on the obscenely...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c480
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an extremely prescient intervention, because the Chancellor, under pressure from the Opposition, had to cave in to a concession on corporation tax in the March Budget. The Government announced the bank levy last June, so we knew that they would be introducing this tax, yet the...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c479
House
House of Commons

Will not the combination of measures on corporation tax being introduced in the Bill advantage the banks over other businesses, and must we not be very careful not to make it appear that the banks are being let off lightly?

Member
Andrew Love (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c479
House
House of Commons

The Government are seeking to take £2.5 billion in revenue from the tax that they have imposed, but has my hon. Friend assessed the corporation tax reductions that the banks will experience, which are thought to be £100 million this year? Has he projected the figure by the end of...

Member
Barry Gardiner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c479
House
House of Commons

Indeed. Were it possible under the rules of order for the Opposition to table an amendment to increase the bank levy rate, we probably would have done so. However, we were unable to do so because of the slightly arcane rules of order. We need to examine the rationale behind...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c478-9
House
House of Commons

We find ourselves in the Committee stage of the Finance Bill, a rather large two-volume measure that, over the coming two days on the Floor of the House, we will no doubt explore in some detail. The Bill will then progress upstairs to Committee, where more detailed scrutiny will take...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c478
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 9, page 41, line 27, at end add—

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c478
House
House of Commons

I must say that I am completely overcome by the power of my hon. Friend's argument and wonder whether the right hon. Member for Gordon and his hon. Friends on the Liberal Democrat Benches really want to argue at this stage for a late codicil to the coalition agreement on...

Member
Ian Mearns (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c618
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right about that. There is no doubt that as we move further forward and the exploration starts to take place west of the Shetland Islands, presenting new challenges, our people working in these industries will again lead the way. But that may not happen if...

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c614-5
House
House of Commons

The point is that we faced an increase in oil prices that had fed through pretty directly to pump prices. The increase in the cost of fuel was not just impacting on motorists, but having a huge impact on hauliers, on the cost of living and on businesses. We had...

Member
Justine Greening (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c622-3
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend hits the nail on the head, because proposed paragraph (b) of amendment 9 talks about wider reform of our banking system. Many Opposition Members have called for action on access to affordable credit, but this is not just about credit unions; it is about the schemes that...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c512
House
House of Commons