Skip to main content

1-20 of 175 results for subject:Elections

Session X
2006-07
Subject X
Legislation

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Legislation (175)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Leader of the House's announcement about plain English statements and a new timetable for questions is welcome. I assume that there will be a chance over a year to consider how the latter works. I hope that there is a case for doing the one thing that, despite her...

Member
Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Business questions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
465 c426-8
House
House of Commons

Lords debate on motion to take note of the White Paper The House of Lords: Reform (Cm 7027). Agreed to on question. (2nd day). (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
Answering member
Lord Strathclyde
Department
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Debates
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c571-609
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to take note of the White Paper The House of Lords: Reform (Cm 7027). Agreed to on question. (2nd day). (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
Answering member
Lord Strathclyde
Department
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Debates
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c620-730
House
House of Lords

My Lords, so much of what I was going to say has already been said, so, as the 91st speaker in this debate, I shall be brief. In his House of Commons speech on Tuesday of last week Kenneth Clarke said that the House of Commons ““has lost its powers””...

Member
Lord Sheldon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c649-50
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am always glad to follow the noble Viscount, who puts his views clearly. I am glad that he mentioned the Far East, as I shall. This is a minimal intervention and has to be a subjective one, as one who speaks as an independent and non-party individual....

Member
Lord Tanlaw (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c681-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Birt, for doing the count so that I know I am number 100 on the speakers’ list. I count with my noble friend Lord Goodhart that, out of the previous 20 speakers, only three were, like me, in favour of a wholly...

Member
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c666-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, having implied that we do nothing in this House, does my noble friend not accept that, over the past 10 years, we made on average 3,400 amendments a year to the Government’s Bills?

Member
Lord Ampthill (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c626
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I suspect—I cannot prove because of the paucity of polling evidence on House of Lords reform—that the public’s apparent indifference, or at least lack of excitement on this issue, stems from three factors, of which the most important is this: we are debating and voting on composition and...

Member
Lord Watson of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c594-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if the noble Lord reads my speech in Hansard tomorrow, he will see that I am trying to follow a consistent theme, which is not helped when entirely irrelevant interventions are made. Some Members of this House, and even more of the other place, have used primacy of...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c714-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not the Chief Whip for my party, but I support the manifesto commitment of my party, as do my colleagues, and I hope that other Members of this House will do the same.

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c716
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the noble Lord be kind enough to give a direct answer to the question asked by my noble friend Lady Finlay? Is his party being whipped on the issues tomorrow?

Member
Viscount Tenby (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c716
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the noble Lord sits down, will he give the House a clear indication of how he proposes to vote tomorrow and whether he proposes to vote for his party’s policy?

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c721
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall vote with the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde.

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c721
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord makes very great speeches with which I often agree, but I find it very hard to discern what he is recommending to his own Members, let alone to the rest of us. Do I understand him to say that the Government have the cart before...

Member
Lord Barnett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c721
House
House of Lords

Have no fear, my Lords. There is a three-line Whip in the party. Perhaps not all colleagues agree with that, but that is the position.

Member
Lord Shutt of Greetland (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c716
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I had a short conversation with a colleague of mine on the Front Bench the other day. I explained to him that the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde, had asked me to wind up this debate after hearing 130 speakers. I asked my noble friend what I should tell...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c716-20
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for that; it is getting late. My final observation is about a hybrid House. I share what I think is the view of the vast majority of your Lordships, that distinguishing between political Peers as between elected and appointed will not work; but I am more...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c720-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if there is no consensus, will the Government legislate or will they not?

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c730
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are searching for a consensus. On Question, Motion agreed to.

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c730
House
House of Lords

My Lords, following the surprising votes in the House of Commons last week, we are not really any more dealing with House of Lords reform; we are dealing with House of Lords abolition. In a fully elected or even a largely elected upper House, there is no room for life...

Member
Lord Cobbold (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
690 c651-3
House
House of Lords