Skip to main content

1-20 of 123 results for subject:"Human embryo experiments"

Session X
2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what involvement he had in the establishment and membership of the UK Stem Cell Initiative.

Asked by
David Gauke (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
93192; 450 c878W;450 c884W
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
HC 1444 2005-06
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs pursuant to the answer of 10 July 2006, Official Report, columns 1519-20W, on human cloning, if she will place in the Library copies of the instructions sent to the UK delegation; if she will list the (a) Departments, (b)...

Asked by
David Amess (Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 2006
Reference
86126; 449 c495W
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science and Technology Committee
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
HC 1308-i 2005-06
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs why the United Kingdom voted against the declaration on human cloning at the United Nations General Assembly; which countries (a) voted in favour, (b) voted against and (c) abstained on the resolution; if she will place in the Library...

Asked by
David Amess (Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 July 2006
Reference
83046; 448 c1519-20W
House
House of Commons

Main estimates 2006-07. Third estimates day (part one). Motion that, for the year ending with 31st March 2007, for expenditure by the Department of Health— (1) further resources, not exceeding £37,417,520,000, be authorised for use as set out in House of Commons Paper No. 1035, (2) a further sum, not...

Lead member
Lord Willis of Knaresborough
Answering member
Caroline Flint
Department
Department of Health
Type
Estimates days
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c528-83
House
House of Commons

I apologise, Mr. Deputy Speaker. The hon. Lady says that only 1 per cent. of abortions take place after 22 weeks. Can she give a rough breakdown to explain why those abortions take place so late?

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c562
House
House of Commons

What scientific evidence was there for the doctors who made that decision—the 77 per cent. who voted against reducing the time limit for abortion from 24 weeks to 22 weeks? Was there any scientific evidence behind that decision? [Interruption.]

Member
Brooks Newmark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c563
House
House of Commons

Yes. Women who have abortions late are very young, or women going through the menopause, women who do not speak English, women who come across the one fifth of GPs who say they are broadly anti-abortion, women who have had difficulty accessing services and women who are scared, ill educated...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c562-3
House
House of Commons

As a society, we are increasingly uncomfortable with the existence of received wisdom and moral certainties. It is probably also true to say that we are becoming uncomfortable even with the principles of secular morality—be it utilitarian or libertarian. Such secular morality is increasingly branded as an extension of ““public...

Member
Brooks Newmark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c559-61
House
House of Commons

I appreciate the opportunity to address the House on recommendation 77 of the Science and Technology Committee, which calls on both Houses"““ to set up a joint committee to consider the scientific, medical and social changes in relation to abortion that have taken place since 1967, with a view to...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c561
House
House of Commons

You say that 1 per cent. of abortions—

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c562
House
House of Commons

Is not there a moral imperative to protect the unborn child?

Member
Brooks Newmark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c568
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman says that we should not discriminate against lesbian couples but, unfortunately, life is discriminatory. The Almighty decided that children would be made through intercourse between a man and a woman. That is nature’s way of creating children. Why does he discount that?

Member
Daniel Kawczynski (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c567
House
House of Commons

That is exactly the point that I was making and I am sorry if I misled the hon. Gentleman. It is important that Parliament be given an opportunity. The bioethics committee is the right vehicle for that.

Member
Lord Willis of Knaresborough (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c550
House
House of Commons

Is the hon. Gentleman seriously suggesting that if we do not allow people to select the sex of their children, we will have parents committing infanticide?

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c545
House
House of Commons

No, I did not say that. We want high moral standards in this country. We do not want to force people to go to other countries with lower moral and ethical standards. For example, the Mastertons had to go to Italy for treatment. Tragically, that resulted in only one male...

Member
Brian Iddon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c545
House
House of Commons

Just because another country may have lower ethical or moral standards, does the hon. Gentleman think that we should introduce them here?

Member
Brooks Newmark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c545
House
House of Commons

Absolutely not, because as the hon. Gentleman knows full well, men are biologically able to go on having children into their 70s and 80s. However, what is proved by deliberately taking a woman who is past her point of fertility—perhaps 15 or 20 years past—and impregnating her?

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c556
House
House of Commons

Not in the slightest. I made the lifestyle choice of getting married and having children. People make such choices. If one chooses to live in a same-sex relationship, it is difficult to have children naturally. I have a good friend who is a homosexual. He and his homosexual partner found...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2006
Reference
448 c556
House
House of Commons