Skip to main content

1-20 of 493 results for house:"House of Lords"

Session X
2005-06
Subject X
Infrastructure

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My right honourable friend the Minister for Housing and Planning has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. The Government are today announcing support for 29 areas across the country which have bid to become new growth points, combining increased housing with new jobs, town centre regeneration and higher design and...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written statements
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
685 c111-4WS
House
House of Lords

Why they did not ask the Government of Israel to contribute funds to the repairs of infrastructure damage in Lebanon.

Asked by
Lord Dykes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 October 2006
Reference
7413; 685 c150WA
House
House of Lords

SI 2006/2375 (Negative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Department for Communities and Local Government. Coming into force 1 October 2006

Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
8 September 2006
Reference
SI 2006/2375
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

How much money has been spent since 1972 on water infrastructure and supply in the United Kingdom.

Asked by
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (Conservative Independent)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 July 2006
Reference
6800; 684 c282-3WA
House
House of Lords

Further to the answers by the Lord Bach on 2 May (HL col. 396), what is the total sum so far spent on the various European water purification directives; and what is their estimate of the total sum necessary to repair the problems with water infrastructure and supply in (a) Thames...

Asked by
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (Conservative Independent)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 June 2006
Reference
5657; 682 c200WA
House
House of Lords

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (Alistair Darling) has made the following Ministerial Statement. I am making a Statement today to the House on the interaction of existing government policy and planning procedures with regard to the need for additional gas supply infrastructure. This...

Member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written statements
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c8-11WS
House
House of Lords

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (Alistair Darling) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. Introduction It has been a tight winter for energy supply, and this has led to high energy prices. The energy market had taken steps to prepare for the winter,...

Member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written statements
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c11-4WS
House
House of Lords

There is no doubt that my noble friend Lord Bradshaw would have had much more to say at this moment than I do. First, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Faulkner of Worcester, for his support and the stress that he put on the effects of this on heritage railways. I think that I picked up...

Member
Earl of Mar and Kellie (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c84-6GC
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Railway and Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006 (S.I. 2006/599) [30th Report from the Merits Committee]. The noble Earl said: I beg to move this Motion on behalf of my noble friend Lord Bradshaw and with his...

Member
Earl of Mar and Kellie (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c78-9GC
House
House of Lords

I have pleasure in supporting the noble Earl. I congratulate him on absorbing the briefing of the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, with such accuracy and demonstrating such fluency in expressing the noble Lord’s arguments this afternoon.

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c79GC
House
House of Lords

I was the other person on the telephone listening to the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, briefing the noble Earl, Lord Mar and Kellie. I certainly do not intend to repeat any of the arguments that he has used. However, I should declare an interest as chairman of the Railway Heritage Committee and as a member...

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c79-80GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate. I am even grateful to my noble friend Lord Berkeley, although I am going to disagree with some of his comments. I am particularly grateful to the noble Earl, Lord Mar and Kellie, who stepped in for the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, who is...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c82-4GC
House
House of Lords

How do you know?

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c79GC
House
House of Lords

I declare an interest as chairman of a rail freight group, although I have not come to talk about rail freight this evening. I spent yesterday at the British Embassy in Berlin, hosting an event organised to demonstrate the success of the British railways structure. The chairman of Network Rail and the chairman...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c80-2GC
House
House of Lords

Railway and Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations (SI 2006/599). Lords debate on motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses room).

Lead member
Earl of Mar and Kellie
Answering member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c78-86GC
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I ask the Minister not to pay quite such wonderful compliments to Network Rail or to be so complacent. The subject of unmanned stations has been brought up in the House before, and the reality is that women do not want to travel on trains after 8 o'clock at night, but nothing is happening. Is there a timetable to make sure that there is closed circuit television in all stations, even those that are unmanned, so that if a crime is committed there might at least be some redress?
Asked by
Baroness O'Cathain (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2006
Reference
681 c1038-9
House
House of Lords
My Lords, will my noble friend encourage Network Rail to look sympathetically at the proposal of some community railways perhaps going through a process of vertical integration? We understand their opposition to the Merseyrail initiative, but surely there is a case for reducing costs and making those railways more cost-effective through this sort of change?
Asked by
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2006
Reference
681 c1038
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the noble Lord accept that, given that Network Rail is a monopoly provider of this service, it is rather extraordinary that only it can decide whether to let someone else into the market? Does he agree that it looks rather odd to put the provision in the 2005 Act if the most obvious area in the country for bringing it in is turned down by Network Rail?
Asked by
Baroness Scott of Needham Market (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2006
Reference
681 c1038
House
House of Lords
My Lords, perhaps I may press the Minister a little further on his reply about economies of scale. The Merseyrail bid is backed by Serco and Netherlands Railways, which are big companies with a lot of power in the market. His answer that they do not have the power of economies of scale is absolutely wrong, and I wonder whether he would care to correct it.
Asked by
Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2006
Reference
681 c1039
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we should not underestimate the successes of Network Rail in reconstructing our rail system from the horrors of the inheritance of Railtrack. We have a vastly improved performance throughout that system, and Network Rail has contributed to that. The question of whether a relatively small part of the railway should detach itself from what are widely regarded as the advantages of economies of scale effected by Network Rail has to be judged on the financial arguments.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 May 2006
Reference
681 c1038
House
House of Lords