1-20 of 20 results for subject:Monuments
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.233 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.006 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Monuments
- We searched for
- subject_t:Monuments OR subject_t:Memorials OR subject_ses:92075
Session
X
1992-93
Type
+
Legislation (3)
+
Delegated legislation (3)
-
Statutory instruments (3)
+
Members' contributions (10)
-
Oral answers to questions (5)
-
Oral questions (5)
+
Parliamentary committees (1)
-
Select Committee reports (1)
+
Parliamentary papers (3)
-
Command papers (1)
-
House of Commons papers (2)
+
Parliamentary questions (9)
-
Oral questions (5)
-
Written questions (4)
House
Session
More
1992-93 (20)
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
SI 1993/1844 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 1 January 1994.
SI 1993/1844 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 1 January 1994.
Department
Department of Health
Type
Statutory instruments
Procedure
Negative
Laid on
22 July 1993
Made on
14 July 1993
Coming into force
1 January 1994
Legislation
Ecclesiastical Fees Measure 1986; Parochial Fees Order 1993
Subjects
Administration; Cemeteries; Church of England; Fees and charges; Monuments; Baptism; Weddings
Commons Library location
UP 2507 1992/93
Date
22 July 1993
Reference
SI 1993/1844
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
If inscriptions on plaques which are unveiled in the course of visits by foreign heads of state are viewed in advance by representatives of Her Majesty's Government.
If inscriptions on plaques which are unveiled in the course of visits by foreign heads of state are viewed in advance by representatives of Her Majesty's Government.
Asked by
William Ross
(Ulster Unionist Party)
Answered by
John Major
(Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
5 July 1993
Answered on
5 July 1993
Subjects
Heads of state; Monuments; State visits; Commemorative plaques
Date
5 July 1993
Reference
228 c13W
House
House of Commons
Type
Command papers
Author
Treasury
Laid on
22 June 1993
Notes
Received 23.06.93; DEBATE;CH 25 OCT 1993
Subjects
Customs and Excise; Accountancy; Conservation; Cultural heritage; Historic buildings; English Heritage; Monuments; Tax collection; Tax avoidance; Repairs and maintenance; VAT; Committee of Public Accounts; Department of National Heritage
Commons Library location
CS 246
Date
22 June 1993
Reference
Cm 2257
House
House of Commons
To comment on the new arrangements for the management of three field monuments on Dartmoor which are in the guardianship of English Heritage.
To comment on the new arrangements for the management of three field monuments on Dartmoor which are in the guardianship of English Heritage.
Asked by
Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of National Heritage
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
16 June 1993
Answered on
16 June 1993
Subjects
Conservation; Architecture; Monuments; Dartmoor National Park Authority
Date
16 June 1993
Reference
226 c624W;226 c620W
House
House of Commons
What plans Sec of State has for millennium fund. -
What plans Sec of State has for millennium fund. -
Asked by
Harry Greenway
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of National Heritage
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
10 May 1993
Answered on
10 May 1993
Subjects
Grants; Millennium Commission; Monuments
Date
10 May 1993
Reference
224 c485-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
(Conservative)
Asked by
Harry Greenway
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of National Heritage
Type
Oral answers to questions
What plans Sec of State has for millennium fund. -
Subjects
Grants; Millennium Commission; Monuments
Date
10 May 1993
Reference
224 c485-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of National Heritage
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Grants; Millennium Commission; Monuments
Date
10 May 1993
Reference
224 c485-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on use of fund to develop individual bursaries.
1st supplementary on use of fund to develop individual bursaries.
Asked by
Harry Greenway
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of National Heritage
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
10 May 1993
Subjects
Grants; Millennium Commission; Monuments
Date
10 May 1993
Reference
224 c485-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
What representations DNH have received in last 6 months as regards future maintenance & stewardship of monuments within Greater London. -
What representations DNH have received in last 6 months as regards future maintenance & stewardship of monuments within Greater London. -
Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of National Heritage
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
10 May 1993
Answered on
10 May 1993
Subjects
Greater London; Listed buildings; Public statues; Monuments; Repairs and maintenance
Date
10 May 1993
Reference
224 c483
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
(Conservative)
Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of National Heritage
Type
Oral answers to questions
What representations DNH have received in last 6 months as regards future maintenance & stewardship of monuments within Greater London. -
Subjects
Greater London; Listed buildings; Public statues; Monuments; Repairs and maintenance
Date
10 May 1993
Reference
224 c483
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on no. of at risk listed buildings, particularly Albert memorial.
1st supplementary on no. of at risk listed buildings, particularly Albert memorial.
Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of National Heritage
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
10 May 1993
Subjects
Greater London; Listed buildings; Public statues; Monuments; Repairs and maintenance
Date
10 May 1993
Reference
224 c483
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of National Heritage
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Greater London; Listed buildings; Public statues; Monuments; Repairs and maintenance
Date
10 May 1993
Reference
224 c483
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of National Heritage
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Greater London; Monuments
Date
10 May 1993
Reference
224 c483-4
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on stewardship of monuments in Greater London particularly Albert memorial.
Supplementary on stewardship of monuments in Greater London particularly Albert memorial.
Asked by
John Bowis
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of National Heritage
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
10 May 1993
Subjects
Greater London; Monuments
Date
10 May 1993
Reference
224 c483-4
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers;
Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Notes
Received 21.04.93; DEBATE;CH 25 OCT 1993
Subjects
Access; Software; Conservation; Central government; Cultural heritage; Architecture; Finance; Grants; Historic buildings; English Heritage; England; Local government; Powers; Property transfer; Listed buildings; Monuments; Repairs and maintenance; Department of National Heritage; Historic Royal Palaces; Royal Armouries
Commons Library location
CS 246
Date
24 March 1993
Reference
HC 252 1992/93
House
House of Commons
SI 1992/1747 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 1 January 1993.
SI 1992/1747 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 1 January 1993.
Department
Privy Council
Type
Statutory instruments
Procedure
Negative
Laid on
16 July 1992
Made on
14 July 1992
Coming into force
1 January 1993
Legislation
Ecclesiastical Fees Measure 1986; Parochial Fees Order 1992
Subjects
Administration; Cemeteries; Church of England; Fees and charges; Monuments; Baptism; Weddings
Commons Library location
UP 463 1992/93
Date
16 July 1992
Reference
SI 1992/1747
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers
Author
National Audit Office
Laid on
10 July 1992
Notes
Received 22.07.92
Subjects
Access; Conservation; Central government; Cultural heritage; Architecture; Grants; Historic buildings; English Heritage; England; Listed buildings; National Heritage Memorial Fund; Monuments; Repairs and maintenance; VAT; Department of the Environment; Department of National Heritage; Historic Royal Palaces; Royal Armouries
Commons Library location
CS 243
Date
10 July 1992
Reference
HC 132 1992/93
House
House of Commons
If it remains Government policy as set out by the then Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Health in a letter to the honourable Member for Twickenham on 25th July 1990, that Teddington Memorial Hospital and the general practitioner beds within it have a secure future for as long as...
If it remains Government policy as set out by the then Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Health in a letter to the honourable Member for Twickenham on 25th July 1990, that Teddington Memorial Hospital and the general practitioner beds within it have a secure future for as long as...
Asked by
Toby Jessel
(Conservative)
Answered by
Tom Sackville
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
1 July 1992
Answered on
1 July 1992
Subjects
General practitioners; Hospital beds; Teddington Memorial Hospital
Date
1 July 1992
Reference
210 c640W;210 c636W
House
House of Commons
What is the occupancy rate for the 27 general practitioner beds at the Teddington Memorial Hospital; and what representations she has received from general practitioners, and from the applicants for trust status concerning the demand for continuation of provision of general practitioner beds. - No figures given.
What is the occupancy rate for the 27 general practitioner beds at the Teddington Memorial Hospital; and what representations she has received from general practitioners, and from the applicants for trust status concerning the demand for continuation of provision of general practitioner beds. - No figures given.
Asked by
Toby Jessel
(Conservative)
Answered by
Tom Sackville
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
1 July 1992
Answered on
1 July 1992
Subjects
General practitioners; Hospital beds; Teddington Memorial Hospital
Date
1 July 1992
Reference
210 c640W;210 c636W
House
House of Commons
SR 1992/238 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 13 July 1992.
SR 1992/238 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 13 July 1992.
Department
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Statutory instruments
Procedure
Negative
Laid on
15 June 1992
Made on
27 May 1992
Coming into force
13 July 1992
Legislation
Public Health (Ireland) Act 1878; Northern Ireland Act 1974; Burial Grounds Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1992
Subjects
Cemeteries; Documents; Functions; Local government; Northern Ireland; Monuments; Repairs and maintenance
Commons Library location
UP 248 1991/92
Date
15 June 1992
Reference
SR 1992/238
House
House of Commons; House of Lords