1-20 of 29 results for subject:Reprography
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.266 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Reprography
- We searched for
- subject_t:Reprography OR subject_t:Copying OR subject_t:Duplicating OR subject_t:Photocopying OR subject_t:"Reprographic equipment" OR subject_t:Xerography OR subject_ses:92821
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 September (HL10442), whether the Government Art Collection claims any form of copyright, other than Crown Copyright, in digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain, whether or not those reproductions were taken by Government...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 September (HL10442), whether the Government Art Collection claims any form of copyright, other than Crown Copyright, in digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain, whether or not those reproductions were taken by Government...
The Government Art Collection (GAC) does not claim copyright in digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain. The GAC has not sought or received guidance about the assertion of copyright, aside from Crown Copyright. The decision to license images for commercial and non-commercial use through a contractual agreement is an operational decision taken by the GAC, based on commercial contract law for the access and supply of digital assets.
There are no current or scheduled plans for the GAC to allow high-resolution images of works of art that are in the Government Art Collection and in the public domain to be downloaded free of charge for non-commercial use.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 September (HL10442), what guidance they have issued to the Government Art Collection about the assertion of copyright, other than Crown Copyright, over digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 September (HL10442), what guidance they have issued to the Government Art Collection about the assertion of copyright, other than Crown Copyright, over digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain.
The Government Art Collection (GAC) does not claim copyright in digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain. The GAC has not sought or received guidance about the assertion of copyright, aside from Crown Copyright. The decision to license images for commercial and non-commercial use through a contractual agreement is an operational decision taken by the GAC, based on commercial contract law for the access and supply of digital assets.
There are no current or scheduled plans for the GAC to allow high-resolution images of works of art that are in the Government Art Collection and in the public domain to be downloaded free of charge for non-commercial use.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 September (HL10442), whether the Government Art Collection holds or plans to hold any contractual or licensing rights over digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain; and if so, what is the...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 September (HL10442), whether the Government Art Collection holds or plans to hold any contractual or licensing rights over digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain; and if so, what is the...
The Government Art Collection (GAC) does not claim copyright in digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain. The GAC has not sought or received guidance about the assertion of copyright, aside from Crown Copyright. The decision to license images for commercial and non-commercial use through a contractual agreement is an operational decision taken by the GAC, based on commercial contract law for the access and supply of digital assets.
There are no current or scheduled plans for the GAC to allow high-resolution images of works of art that are in the Government Art Collection and in the public domain to be downloaded free of charge for non-commercial use.
To ask His Majesty's Government what guidance they provide to national museums and galleries about the copyright status of exact digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain.
To ask His Majesty's Government what guidance they provide to national museums and galleries about the copyright status of exact digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain.
According to case law, a work will only be protected by copyright if it is original, in the sense that is the author’s ‘own intellectual creation’. It is questionable whether an unaltered reproduction of an existing work where copyright has expired could satisfy this criterion if there has been no (or very limited) scope for the creator to exercise free creative choices. However, this will depend on the individual facts of the case.
Further guidance is published on GOV.UK in an Intellectual Property Office copyright notice on digital images, photographs and the internet.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of how national museums and galleries treat the copyright status of exact digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of how national museums and galleries treat the copyright status of exact digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain.
According to case law, a work will only be protected by copyright if it is original, in the sense that is the author’s ‘own intellectual creation’. It is questionable whether an unaltered reproduction of an existing work where copyright has expired could satisfy this criterion if there has been no (or very limited) scope for the creator to exercise free creative choices. However, this will depend on the individual facts of the case.
The Government has made no assessment of how cultural heritage institutions treat the copyright status of such reproductions in practice.
I. Letter dated 17/12/2013 from Viscount Younger of Leckie to Baroness Buscombe and other Members regarding the copyright exceptions debate on 5 December. 1 p. II. Annex A: answers to points raised during the debate. 9 p.
I. Letter dated 17/12/2013 from Viscount Younger of Leckie to Baroness Buscombe and other Members regarding the copyright exceptions debate on 5 December. 1 p. II. Annex A: answers to points raised during the debate. 9 p.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what was (1) the total expenditure, excluding value added tax, on photocopier paper, and (2) the average purchase price, excluding value added tax, of a 500-sheet ream of white A4 80gsm photocopier paper, by (a) the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and (b)...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what was (1) the total expenditure, excluding value added tax, on photocopier paper, and (2) the average purchase price, excluding value added tax, of a 500-sheet ream of white A4 80gsm photocopier paper, by (a) the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and (b)...
Expenditure is set out in the table below. Figures exclude VAT.
| Body | Period
Covered | Expenditure
on Photocopier Paper
(£) | Average
Price per Ream
(£) |
| Core
Defra | 01.11.2011-31.10.2012 | 67,873 | 2.34 |
| Food
and Environment Research
Agency | 31.10.2011-31.10.2012 | 11,808 | 2.46 |
| Centre
for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture
Science | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 1,978 | 2.35 |
| Animal
Health and Veterinary Laboratory
Agency | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 57,404 | 2.26 |
| Rural
Payments
Agency | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 78,820 | 2.28 |
| Veterinary
Medicines
Directorate | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 4,100 | 2.47 |
The RPA and AHVLA used two suppliers during the course of the 2011-12 financial year. The average price per ream for these two bodies reflects the price charged by the current supplier.
Periods covered vary according to the latest available information for each organisation.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what was the total expenditure on photocopier paper, excluding value added tax, in the latest year for which figures are available, by (1) the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and (2) each of its executive agencies; and what was the average purchase...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what was the total expenditure on photocopier paper, excluding value added tax, in the latest year for which figures are available, by (1) the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and (2) each of its executive agencies; and what was the average purchase...
Expenditure is set out in the table below. Figures exclude VAT.
| Body | Period
Covered | Expenditure
on Photocopier Paper
(£) | Average
Price per Ream
(£) |
| Core
Defra | 01.11.2011-31.10.2012 | 67,873 | 2.34 |
| Food
and Environment Research
Agency | 31.10.2011-31.10.2012 | 11,808 | 2.46 |
| Centre
for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture
Science | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 1,978 | 2.35 |
| Animal
Health and Veterinary Laboratory
Agency | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 57,404 | 2.26 |
| Rural
Payments
Agency | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 78,820 | 2.28 |
| Veterinary
Medicines
Directorate | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 4,100 | 2.47 |
The RPA and AHVLA used two suppliers during the course of the 2011-12 financial year. The average price per ream for these two bodies reflects the price charged by the current supplier.
Periods covered vary according to the latest available information for each organisation.
Letter dated 06/04/2010 from Lynn Rattigan, Acting Executive Officer, to Lord Bates regarding photocopier paper purchased by the Royal Armouries. 1 p.
Letter dated 06/04/2010 from Lynn Rattigan, Acting Executive Officer, to Lord Bates regarding photocopier paper purchased by the Royal Armouries. 1 p.
asked the Chairman of Committees:What was the cost for each of the past four years of the provision of photocopiers in communal areas of the House of Lords.
asked the Chairman of Committees:What was the cost for each of the past four years of the provision of photocopiers in communal areas of the House of Lords.
| 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | |
| Palace | £7,960 | £5,478 | £5,669 | £5,669 |
| Outbuildings | £7,417 | £6,001 | £5,864 | £5,864 |
| Total | £15,377 | £11,479 | £11,533 | £11,533 |
asked the Chairman of Committees:What consideration is being given to the provision of minimal function photocopying in communal areas the House of Lords.
asked the Chairman of Committees:What consideration is being given to the provision of minimal function photocopying in communal areas the House of Lords.
What plans there are for the conservation and public display of original records and constitutional documents in the House of Lords; which documents will in future be displayed in their original form; and which as facsimiles. [HL 1391].
What plans there are for the conservation and public display of original records and constitutional documents in the House of Lords; which documents will in future be displayed in their original form; and which as facsimiles. [HL 1391].
Copyright (Visually Impaired Persons) Bill. Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Committed to a Committee of the Whole House.
Copyright (Visually Impaired Persons) Bill. Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Committed to a Committee of the Whole House.
Under what statutory authority the Newspapers Licensing Authority charges organisations for photocopying press articles; and whether the legislation distinguishes between photocopying for internal use by an organisation's staff and sending copies to outside persons; and what statutory provision exists for the Newspaper Licensing Authority to make exemptions for charities from...
Under what statutory authority the Newspapers Licensing Authority charges organisations for photocopying press articles; and whether the legislation distinguishes between photocopying for internal use by an organisation's staff and sending copies to outside persons; and what statutory provision exists for the Newspaper Licensing Authority to make exemptions for charities from...
Further to his Written Answer on 28 June (5WA), whether the Administration and Works Sub-Committee will consider making photocopying and fax facilities available for the convenience of parties, and their legal representatives, if necessary upon payment of a reasonable charge; and whether the Administration and Works Sub-Committee will consider making...
Further to his Written Answer on 28 June (5WA), whether the Administration and Works Sub-Committee will consider making photocopying and fax facilities available for the convenience of parties, and their legal representatives, if necessary upon payment of a reasonable charge; and whether the Administration and Works Sub-Committee will consider making...
Whether the Administration and Works Sub-Committee will consider making photocopying and fax facilities available to parties, and their legal representatives, appearing before the Appellate Committees of the House, if necessary upon payment of a reasonable charge. [HL 3239].
Whether the Administration and Works Sub-Committee will consider making photocopying and fax facilities available to parties, and their legal representatives, appearing before the Appellate Committees of the House, if necessary upon payment of a reasonable charge. [HL 3239].
Further to the Written Answer of the Lord Chancellor of 12 January (584 c121WA), how and upon what basis the full cost of photocopying are calculated per page at the Public Record Office. [HL197].
Further to the Written Answer of the Lord Chancellor of 12 January (584 c121WA), how and upon what basis the full cost of photocopying are calculated per page at the Public Record Office. [HL197].
Whether complaints from bodies representing user interests as well as from individual readers continue to be made to the Government or the Advisory Council on Public Records about the hours during which the Public Record Office is open to readers and the level of charges made for photocopying and other...
Whether complaints from bodies representing user interests as well as from individual readers continue to be made to the Government or the Advisory Council on Public Records about the hours during which the Public Record Office is open to readers and the level of charges made for photocopying and other...
Whether it remains the case since the publication of the Report of the Committee on Modern Public Records (Cmnd 8204, March 1991, paragraph 512) that the pricing structure for the photocopying of records at the Public Record Office owes more to predetermined financial conventions than to public records policy; and...
Whether it remains the case since the publication of the Report of the Committee on Modern Public Records (Cmnd 8204, March 1991, paragraph 512) that the pricing structure for the photocopying of records at the Public Record Office owes more to predetermined financial conventions than to public records policy; and...
Whether it remains the case, as reported by the Committee on Modern Public Records (Cmnd 8204, March 1991), paragraph 512), that photocopying charges are significantly higher at the Public Record Office than at comparable United Kingdom bodies or high by international standards. [HL 82].
Whether it remains the case, as reported by the Committee on Modern Public Records (Cmnd 8204, March 1991), paragraph 512), that photocopying charges are significantly higher at the Public Record Office than at comparable United Kingdom bodies or high by international standards. [HL 82].