1-3 of 3 results for subject:ISAF
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.166 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:ISAF
- We searched for
- subject_t:ISAF OR subject_t:"International Security Assistance Force" OR subject_ses:11057
Primary member
X
Tonge, Baroness
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Tonge, Baroness (3)
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
My Lords, does the Minister agree with me that it would have been better to have dropped aid and not bombs on Afghanistan in the first place?
My Lords, does the Minister agree with me that it would have been better to have dropped aid and not bombs on Afghanistan in the first place?
Asked by
Baroness Tonge
(Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
25 July 2007
My Lords, the noble Baroness will recall the very difficult circumstances in the immediate aftermath of the events of 9/11 which led to the intervention in Afghanistan. I think that there was broad support for that intervention in this House, in this country and in the other House. In that sense, there was a need to secure the fall of the Taliban regime; but that does not remove the equal need for heavy investment in reconstruction and development.
Subjects
Armed forces; Deployment; Germany; France; Peacekeeping operations; Military alliances; Afghanistan; NATO; ISAF
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
694 c794
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much opium has been (a) impounded and (b) destroyed by ISAF forces in Afghanistan in each month since January 2002.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much opium has been (a) impounded and (b) destroyed by ISAF forces in Afghanistan in each month since January 2002.
Asked by
Baroness Tonge
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
22 May 2003
For answer on
9 June 2003
Answered on
9 June 2003
Dr. Tonge: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much opium has been (a) impounded and (b) destroyed by ISAF forces in
Afghanistan in each month since January 2002. [116418]
Mr. Ingram: Where ISAF forces come across opium, the drugs, and any individuals involved, are handed over to the Afghanistan
authorities. However, it is possible that during initial ISAF operations, some drug stockpiles were destroyed.
The Headquarters of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) does not maintain a record of the quantity of opium which may
have been impounded and/or destroyed by ISAF forces.
Subjects
Crops; Drugs; Peacekeeping operations; Production; Afghanistan; ISAF; Opium
Date
9 June 2003
Reference
116418; 406 c647W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what plans he and the international community have to extend ISAF beyond Kabul. - Inc ref to UN Security Council Resolutions 1444 and 1306.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what plans he and the international community have to extend ISAF beyond Kabul. - Inc ref to UN Security Council Resolutions 1444 and 1306.
Asked by
Baroness Tonge
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Mike O'Brien
(Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
10 January 2003
For answer on
20 January 2003
Answered on
20 January 2003
Dr. Tonge: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what plans he and the international community have to
extend ISAF beyond Kabul. [90908]
Mr. Mike O'Brien: There are currently no plans to adjust ISAF's mandate. UNSCR 1444, adopted unanimously on 27 November 2002
following discussions among UN Security Council members, extends the existing ISAF mandate until 20 December 2003. As defined in
UNSCR 1386 of 20 December 2001, this authorises ISAF to operate in Kabul and the surrounding area only.
Subjects
Armed forces; Deployment; Peacekeeping operations; UN resolutions; Afghanistan; ISAF
Date
20 January 2003
Reference
90908; 398 c80W;398 c81-2W
House
House of Commons