How they intend to guarantee the safety and well-being of Peter Clarence Foster when he is returned to this country after his extradition from Australia. [HL 3539].

How they intend to guarantee the safety and well-being of Peter Clarence Foster when he is returned to this country after his extradition from Australia. [HL 3539].

What is the public interest in their continued efforts to extradite Peter Clarence Foster from Australia when the offences for which he stands charged have already been dropped or dismissed against a colleague with costs. [HL 1577].

What is the public interest in their continued efforts to extradite Peter Clarence Foster from Australia when the offences for which he stands charged have already been dropped or dismissed against a colleague with costs. [HL 1577].

Whether the National Audit Office will be asked to examine the costs of the extradition proceedings against Peter Clarence Foster to establish whether the costs to date are justified. [HL 1578]. - No.

Whether the National Audit Office will be asked to examine the costs of the extradition proceedings against Peter Clarence Foster to establish whether the costs to date are justified. [HL 1578]. - No.

Whether the Serious Fraud Office has to clear any intended extradition proceedings in Australia through the office of the Attorney General or any other govt office before commencing proceedings. [HL 1276].

Whether the Serious Fraud Office has to clear any intended extradition proceedings in Australia through the office of the Attorney General or any other govt office before commencing proceedings. [HL 1276].

Whether the cost to date of £434,696 of the extradition proceedings against Peter Clarence Foster is justified in view of the failure of their case against 'another person' mentioned in the written answer of the Lord Chancellor on 22 February (103WA) on similar charges where full costs were awarded against...

Whether the cost to date of £434,696 of the extradition proceedings against Peter Clarence Foster is justified in view of the failure of their case against 'another person' mentioned in the written answer of the Lord Chancellor on 22 February (103WA) on similar charges where full costs were awarded against...

Who in the Serious Fraud Office is accountable for the expenditure of applications such as that involved in the extradition of Peter Clarence Foster. [HL 1278].

Who in the Serious Fraud Office is accountable for the expenditure of applications such as that involved in the extradition of Peter Clarence Foster. [HL 1278].

What are the full details and the amount of money involved in each of the 16 charges for which Peter Clarence Foster is being extradited from Australia. [HL 1279]. - Includes figures.

What are the full details and the amount of money involved in each of the 16 charges for which Peter Clarence Foster is being extradited from Australia. [HL 1279]. - Includes figures.

What are the charges against Peter Clarence Foster for which he is being extradited from Australia by the Serious Fraud Office. [HL 954]. - Inc figures.

What are the charges against Peter Clarence Foster for which he is being extradited from Australia by the Serious Fraud Office. [HL 954]. - Inc figures.

What is the cost to date of the action of the Serious Fraud Office against Peter Clarence Foster, whose extradition from Australia they are currently pursuing. [HL 953].

What is the cost to date of the action of the Serious Fraud Office against Peter Clarence Foster, whose extradition from Australia they are currently pursuing. [HL 953].