Skip to main content

1-20 of 22 results for subject:Elections

Primary member X
Mundell, David

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

More
Mundell, David (22)

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Right hon. Member for Kenilworth and Southam, representing the Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission, whether the Speaker's Committee has had discussions with the Electoral Commission on the capacity of Dumfries and Galloway Council to (a) conduct the Scottish Parliament constituency counts for the (i) Dumfriesshire and...

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 November 2025
Reference
90678
House
House of Commons

Queen's recommendation signified. Money resolution. Ways and means resolution. Programme motion (no. 3) on proceedings on consideration of Lords amendments and subsequent stages. Agreed to on question. Lords amendments considered. The Deputy Speaker announced that Lords amendment 22 engaged Commons financial privilege. Lords amendment 1, discussed with Lords amendments 2...

Lead member
David Mundell
Department
Scotland Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
607 cc1683-1695
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
David Mundell
Answering member
Ian Murray
Department
Scotland Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Third Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
14 September 2015
House
House of Commons

Scotland Bill. Consideration of Lords amendments. Lords amendments agreed to.

Lead member
David Mundell
Department
Scotland Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
26 April 2012
Reference
543 c1132-79
House
House of Commons

Draft Scottish Parliament (Elections etc.) Order 2010. Debate on a motion to approve. The Deputy Speaker's opinion as to the decision of the Question being challenged, the division was deferred until Wednesday 1 December. Agreed on deferred division (317 to 212).

Lead member
David Mundell
Answering member
Tom Greatrex
Department
Scotland Office
Type
Legislative debates
Date
24 November 2010
Reference
519 c377-401
House
House of Commons
I am pleased that the right hon. Gentleman could give a categorical assurance to the House that there were no unlawful or completely unacceptable donations to the Scottish Labour party campaign for the Scottish elections—but does not this very issue highlight the reason why his predecessor the right hon. Member for Paisley and Renfrewshire, South (Mr. Alexander), who is now Secretary of State for International Development, should not have administered the elections and at the same time run the Labour party campaign?
Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 November 2007
Reference
468 c265
House
House of Commons
But does the Secretary of State not agree that his predecessor, who was also Transport Secretary, has a lot of explaining to do to the House, not least about the Scottish election debacle? Does he not agree that rather than hide behind pre-recorded television interviews, his right hon. Friend should face scrutiny in the House and appear before the Scottish Affairs Committee?
Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 November 2007
Reference
468 c265-6
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish minutes of meetings held with Scotland Office Ministers and the Ron Gould Scottish Elections review team.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 November 2007
Reference
165814; 467 c1063-4W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland when he plans to publish the Government's response to the Ron Gould report on the Scottish elections.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 November 2007
Reference
467 c457W; 165815
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what procedure the right hon. Member for Paisley and Renfrewshire, South followed on appointment as Labour Party co-ordinator for the Scottish elections in May 2007, in relation to the Ministerial Code, with particular reference to sections (a) 1.2(f), (b) 7.3 and (c)...

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
161393; 465 c603W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what information his Department provided to the inquiry led by Ron Gould into the conduct of Scottish elections in May 2007 on auto-adjudication without human supervision; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 October 2007
Reference
158774; 464 c1363-4W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what discussions he has had since the Scottish parliamentary elections in May 2007 with returning officers on auto-adjudication during the counting.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 October 2007
Reference
158773; 464 c1363W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what discussions have taken place since the Scottish Parliamentary elections in May between the Secretary of State and returning officers on the process of auto-adjudication used during the counting process.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
155096; 464 c7W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland whether the Government's review of the experience of new voting systems will take account of information to be reported by the current Electoral Commission's review chaired by Ron Gould of the recent Scottish elections.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
464 c7W; 156189
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland whether he has met Scottish Ministers to discuss the Electoral Commission’s statutory review of the Scottish parliamentary elections.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
145653; 462 c2W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what level of consultation was undertaken with political parties about the design and format of ballot papers used in the Glasgow and Lothian regions for the recent Scottish parliamentary elections.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
145655; 462 c3W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland whether he was consulted on the final ballot papers adopted for the Scottish parliamentary elections in May which were issued to voters.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
145654; 462 c2-3W
House
House of Commons

Conduct of the Scottish parliamentary elections. Twelfth opposition day debate (part 1). Motion negatived on division (160 to 329). Amendment agreed on question.

Lead member
David Mundell
Answering member
Douglas Alexander
Department
Department for Transport; Scotland Office
Type
Opposition days
Date
23 May 2007
Reference
460 c1301-45
House
House of Commons
The Scottish Executive and the Scotland Office published their response to the Arbuthnott Commission today. I find both responses disappointing. Does the Minister share my consternation that the Scottish Executive should dismiss the Arbuthnott Commission’s recommendation to split the Scottish parliamentary and local government elections, without presenting any evidence that that would increase turnout, whereas all the evidence shows that it will increase confusion? Does he agree that the Scottish Executive and his Government are showing contempt for the people of Scotland by bringing about two major electoral changes on one day?
Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 January 2007
Reference
455 c1268-9
House
House of Commons
Does the Minister accept that voter participation is not just about the number of people who turn up at the polling station but the number of validly cast votes? What level of improperly cast ballots is unacceptable? Will he and the Scottish Executive move away from the system that they, along with their Liberal Democrat chums, foisted on the people of Scotland?
Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 January 2007
Reference
455 c1269
House
House of Commons