1-20 of 101 results for subject:"EU law"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.293 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.012 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"EU law"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"EU law" OR subject_t:"EC law" OR subject_t:"EU law and treaties" OR subject_t:"European Community law" OR subject_t:"European Union law" OR subject_ses:49839
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will publish a plan for how the Brussels regime on EU civil justice co-operation will apply post-Brexit.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will publish a plan for how the Brussels regime on EU civil justice co-operation will apply post-Brexit.
As made clear in the Government’s White Paper, The United Kingdom’s exit from and new partnership with the European Union, civil judicial cooperation is an important issue, which is being considered as part of the UK's preparations for EU exit negotiations.
We recognise that an effective system of civil judicial cooperation will provide certainty and protection for citizens and businesses, families and consumers. The UK intends to keep working with others, including stakeholders, in order to ensure a smooth transition to future arrangements.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they intend to publish the White Paper on the Great Repeal Bill.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they intend to publish the White Paper on the Great Repeal Bill.
I refer the noble Lord to the answer given on 20 February 2017 to Question HL5308.
The Government will bring forward a White Paper on the Great Repeal Bill in advance of introduction of the Great Repeal Bill in the next session. It will set out our approach to giving effect to withdrawal on the domestic statute book.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the remarks in the White Paper The United Kingdom's exit from and new partnership with the European Union, how the Great Repeal Bill will ensure that legislatures and Courts in the UK will be the final decision-makers in respect of UK cases.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the remarks in the White Paper The United Kingdom's exit from and new partnership with the European Union, how the Great Repeal Bill will ensure that legislatures and Courts in the UK will be the final decision-makers in respect of UK cases.
The Government will bring forward legislation in the next session that, when enacted, will repeal the European Communities Act 1972 and ensure a functioning statute book on the day we leave the EU. This ‘Great Repeal Bill’ will end the authority of EU law and return power to the UK.
The Prime Minister has been clear that we will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the UK.
Our laws will be made in Westminster, Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast and those laws will be interpreted by judges not in Luxembourg but in courts across this country.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they plan to publish a White Paper on the Great Repeal Bill.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they plan to publish a White Paper on the Great Repeal Bill.
The Government will bring forward a White Paper on the Great Repeal Bill in advance of introduction of the Great Repeal Bill in the next session. It will set out our approach to giving effect to withdrawal on the domestic statute book.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will publish a list of the fundamental rights guaranteed under EU law and explain what approach they intend to take towards them before triggering Article 50.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will publish a list of the fundamental rights guaranteed under EU law and explain what approach they intend to take towards them before triggering Article 50.
The UK has a long-standing and proud tradition of ensuring our rights and traditional liberties are protected domestically, and of fulfilling our international human rights obligations. The decision to leave the European Union does not change that, and the UK will remain committed to its international human rights obligations. We are about to begin negotiations and it would be wrong to set out unilateral positions in advance.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of whether EU laws on telecommunications and media protect freedom of the press and freedom of expression.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of whether EU laws on telecommunications and media protect freedom of the press and freedom of expression.
EU laws on telecommunications (electronic communications services) exclude services that provide, or exercise editorial control over content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services. While printed media (e.g. newspapers) are not within the scope of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, the Directive does apply to audio visual media, (television broadcasts and other tv-like content). The Government has considered the impact of the Directive on freedom of expression when responding to the European Commission's consultation on the future of that Directive. The Government's response is attached.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will make representations to the European Commission regarding the interpretation of European Regulation 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 so as to promote effective access to information without excessive restrictions. [HL82]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will make representations to the European Commission regarding the interpretation of European Regulation 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 so as to promote effective access to information without excessive restrictions. [HL82]
The Government recognises the importance of transparency by European Union institutions, with appropriate safeguards for genuinely sensitive information, and the key role the Regulation plays in promoting openness and accountability. However, the Government has no plans to make representations to the European Commission regarding the interpretation of Regulation 1049/2001 on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they support changes to European Union Regulation 1049 on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents so as to (1) extend the institutional scope of the Regulation to all EU bodies, (2) ensure legislative transparency, (3) align the Regulation with the Aarhus...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they support changes to European Union Regulation 1049 on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents so as to (1) extend the institutional scope of the Regulation to all EU bodies, (2) ensure legislative transparency, (3) align the Regulation with the Aarhus...
The Government have been fully engaged in the discussions on the recast of the access to documents regulation and is committed to the principle of transparency within EU institutions.
The Government support an enhancement of transparency and therefore strongly oppose any restriction on what constitutes a document for the purposes of the regulation.
Specifically, the Government support an extension of the institutional scope of the regulation in accordance with the Lisbon treaty and an alignment of the regulation with the Aarhus convention. We support the extension of legislative transparency, although this must be balanced against the importance of protecting important and sensitive information, such as legal advice. We also strongly oppose any proposals to weaken the protection afforded to personal privacy and remain of the view that the right to information must be appropriately balanced with the right to privacy.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they intend to appoint a national rapporteur, or equivalent mechanism, to report on the fulfilment of the United Kingdom's obligations under EU Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they intend to appoint a national rapporteur, or equivalent mechanism, to report on the fulfilment of the United Kingdom's obligations under EU Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how they will ensure that their strategy on human trafficking is compatible with EU Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how they will ensure that their strategy on human trafficking is compatible with EU Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government , further to the Written Answer by Lord McNally on 24 January (WA 117), why they changed the explanatory notes for Clause 18 of the European Union Bill by removing the reference to the common law recognition of the principle of parliamentary sovereignty.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government , further to the Written Answer by Lord McNally on 24 January (WA 117), why they changed the explanatory notes for Clause 18 of the European Union Bill by removing the reference to the common law recognition of the principle of parliamentary sovereignty.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government in what circumstances Ministers are entitled not to accept the advice of the Attorney-General on the legal obligations of the United Kingdom under European Union law.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government in what circumstances Ministers are entitled not to accept the advice of the Attorney-General on the legal obligations of the United Kingdom under European Union law.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what effect their plan to reaffirm Parliamentary sovereignty by further legislation will have on the supremacy of European law and the direct effect of European legislation.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what effect their plan to reaffirm Parliamentary sovereignty by further legislation will have on the supremacy of European law and the direct effect of European legislation.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will publish the recent opinions of the European Commission regarding the United Kingdom allegedly not giving full effect to European Union equality legislation.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will publish the recent opinions of the European Commission regarding the United Kingdom allegedly not giving full effect to European Union equality legislation.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the power proposed in clause 73 of the Equality Bill and regulations made thereunder would have to be interpreted and applied so as to comply with the obligations imposed by European Union equal pay legislation.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the power proposed in clause 73 of the Equality Bill and regulations made thereunder would have to be interpreted and applied so as to comply with the obligations imposed by European Union equal pay legislation.
asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by the Lord President (Baroness Ashton of Upholland) on 22 July (WA 243), whether, in light of the race directive as interpreted by the European Court of Justice, it is appropriate and necessary to introduce amending legislation to allow the Equality and...
asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by the Lord President (Baroness Ashton of Upholland) on 22 July (WA 243), whether, in light of the race directive as interpreted by the European Court of Justice, it is appropriate and necessary to introduce amending legislation to allow the Equality and...
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether United Kingdom anti-discrimination legislation needs to be amended in light of the decision of the European Court of Justice in Case C–54/07 Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding v Firma Feryn NV.
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether United Kingdom anti-discrimination legislation needs to be amended in light of the decision of the European Court of Justice in Case C–54/07 Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding v Firma Feryn NV.
Lords question for short debate on whether they will introduce legislation to ensure that the same burden of proof applies to cases alleging discrimination on the ground of colour as to cases alleging discrimination on the grounds of race or ethnicity.
Lords question for short debate on whether they will introduce legislation to ensure that the same burden of proof applies to cases alleging discrimination on the ground of colour as to cases alleging discrimination on the grounds of race or ethnicity.
asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Andrews on 28 February (WA 132-3), what is the basis for their interpretation of the European Union race directive as not covering discrimination on the ground of colour.
asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Andrews on 28 February (WA 132-3), what is the basis for their interpretation of the European Union race directive as not covering discrimination on the ground of colour.