Skip to main content

1-20 of 23 results for subject:Protection

Primary member X
Howe, Earl

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

More
Howe, Earl (23)

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords report stage second day. Amendment 19 disagreed to on division (82 to 211). Amendments 20 to 22, 25, 28, 31, 33, 36 to 45, 48 to 54 and 56 agreed to. Amendment 57 agreed to on division (200 to 192). Amendment 58 agreed to on division (203 to 192)....

Lead member
Earl Howe; Lord Roborough; Lord Bellamy
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Baroness Thornton
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
23 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1383-1464
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage third day. Amendment 151A disagreed to on division (59 to 99). Amendments 153A, 157 and 157A agreed to. (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Kamall; Earl Howe; Baroness Penn
Answering member
Baroness Thornton; Baroness Merron
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates on bills
Date
7 March 2022
Reference
819 cc1214-1252
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage second day. Amendments 14 and 14A agreed to. Amendment 15 disagreed to on division (249 to 279). Amendment 21 agreed to on division (273 to 235).

Lead member
Earl Howe; Lord True; Baroness Penn
Answering member
Lord Eatwell; Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills
Date
14 April 2021
Reference
811 cc1313-560
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage first day. Amendment 1 agreed to on division (296 to 255). Amendment 3 disagreed to on division in accordance with Standing Order 55 (276 to 276). Amendments 8 to 10 agreed to. Amendment 13 agreed to.

Lead member
Earl Howe; Lord True; Baroness Penn
Answering member
Lord Eatwell; Baroness Jones of Whitchurch; Lord Stevenson of Balmacara; Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills
Date
24 March 2021
Reference
811 cc856-950
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage. Amendments 1, 3-7, 9-12, 14-31 agreed to. Amendment 32 agreed to on division (270 votes to 246). Amendments 35-44 agreed to. Amendment 52 agreed to on division (281 votes to 244). Amendments 54-55, 57-58 and 60-61 agreed to. Amendment 63 to amendment 62 agreed to on division...

Lead member
Earl Howe; Baroness Stedman-Scott
Answering member
Baroness Sherlock
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on bills
Date
30 June 2020
Reference
804 cc577-1729
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage third day. Clauses 26 to 30 agreed. New clauses discussed and withdrawn. Clause 31 agreed. Government new clause discussed and withdrawn. Clauses 32 to 35 agreed. Amendments not moved. Schedule 2 agreed. New clause discussed and withdrawn. Clauses 36 to 39 agreed. Government amendments 81 and 82...

Lead member
Earl Howe; Baroness Williams of Trafford; Baroness Barran
Department
Home Office; Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on bills; Committee proceedings
Date
6 February 2019
Reference
795 cc365-425GC
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage first day. Amendments discussed and withdrawn. Clause 1 agreed. Schedule 1 agreed. Clauses 2 to 5 agreed. Amendment 24 (to amendment 23) agreed. Amendment 23, as amended, withdrawn. Clauses 6 to 9 agreed. Clause 13 agreed.

Lead member
Earl Howe; Baroness Williams of Trafford
Department
Home Office; Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on bills; Committee proceedings
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 cc149-214GC
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the NHS investigations into Jimmy Savile.

Lead member
Earl Howe
Department
Department of Health
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
26 February 2015
Reference
759 cc1822-1836
House
House of Lords

Lords second reading. Agreed to on question. Bill committed to a Committee of the Whole House.

Lead member
Earl Howe
Answering member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
Department
Department of Health
Type
Debates on bills
Date
21 May 2013
Reference
745 cc746-827
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on Winterbourne View.

Lead member
Earl Howe
Department
Department of Health
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
10 December 2012
Reference
741 cc915-928
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the safeguarding of former Winterbourne View residents.

Lead member
Earl Howe
Department
Department of Health
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
30 October 2012
Reference
740 cc506-514
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is the Minister aware of another area of uncertainty in the current law? When an investigation takes place in a case where a vulnerable adult is believed to be suffering abuse, there is no definition of what a ““satisfactory outcome”” might amount to. For example, apart from ensuring that the abuse has stopped, it is not clear what the responsibilities of the statutory authorities are to provide help to enable people to overcome the effects of abuse. Will the Government look at that?
Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 March 2007
Reference
690 c1227
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Minister said—his colleague said something similar in a Commons written reply—that the Government did not hold information about the number of individuals employed in the NHS and social services whose names appear on the Protection of Children Act list. Would it not be a good idea to remedy that absence of information? Will the Minister take steps to do so?
Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c1183-4
House
House of Lords

Whether, following the decision of the General Medical Council to strike off Professor Sir Roy Meadow, they will now withdraw or review the guidance issued by the Department of Health on factitious or induced illness.

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 November 2005
Reference
2060; 675 c156WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they will withdraw and amend their guidance document Safeguarding Children in Whom Illness is Fabricated or Induced in the light of the recent Court of Appeal judgment in R v Cannings. [HL 1013]. - Inc ref to 23 February 2004 CH 418 c37-46.

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2004
Reference
HL 1013; 658 c93WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they will take account of the recent Court of Appeal judgement in R v Cannings when considering the responses to the Department for Education and Skills consultation on safeguarding children with particular reference to the section headed "Factitious or Induced Illness (Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy). [HL 1017].

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 February 2004
Reference
HL 1017; 658 c3WA
House
House of Lords

What resources have been transferred from local authority child protection services to the implementation of Section 17 of the Children Act 1989 in accordance with the directive entitled Refocusing Children's Services, issued by the Department of Health in 1996. [HL 4558].

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2003
Reference
HL 4558; 653 c64WA
House
House of Lords

What directions are to be issued to judges on the conduct of care and adoption proceedings in the light of the judgement delivered by the European Court of Human Rights in the case of P C and S v the United Kingdom. [HL 1861].

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 March 2003
Reference
HL 1861; 646 c8WA
House
House of Lords

What guidance they propose to issue to social services departments of local authorities in the light of the judgment delivered by the European Court of Human Rights in the case of P C and S v The United Kingdom. [HL 1862].

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 March 2003
Reference
HL 1862; 645 c117WA
House
House of Lords

What directions or guidance they propose to issue to social services departments of local authorities in the light of the judgment delivered by the European Court of Human Rights in the case of PC and S v the United Kingdom. [HL 5408].

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 July 2002
Reference
HL 5408; 638 c152WA
House
House of Lords