1-20 of 23 results for answeredby:"James Brokenshire"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.186 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- answeredby:"James Brokenshire"
- We searched for
- answeringMember_ses:299380 OR answeringDept_ses:299380 OR askedToReplyAuthor_ses:299380
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential effect of proposed changes to Tier 2 visas on the recruitment of people with specific skills from overseas to the video games industry.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential effect of proposed changes to Tier 2 visas on the recruitment of people with specific skills from overseas to the video games industry.
The Government has commissioned the independent Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) to advise on restricting Tier 2 to genuine skills shortages and jobs which require highly-specialised experts, but with sufficient flexibility to include high value roles and key public service workers. There are 18 jobs in the video games industry currently included on the Shortage Occupation List.
The MAC is looking at selection criteria such as, but not limited to, salaries, particular attributes, economic need and skills level. The MAC is not due to report until December and we do not yet know what its findings and recommendations will be. We await the report with interest and will consider it carefully before making any significant changes to the Tier 2 route.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent discussions she has had with (a) ministerial colleagues in the Ministry of Justice, (b) the Muslim Institute, (c) the Muslim Council of Great Britain and (d) the Muslim Parliament of Great Britain on the legal status of Islamic...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent discussions she has had with (a) ministerial colleagues in the Ministry of Justice, (b) the Muslim Institute, (c) the Muslim Council of Great Britain and (d) the Muslim Parliament of Great Britain on the legal status of Islamic...
Home Office Ministers and officials have meetings with a wide variety of
international partners, as well as organisations and individuals in the public
and private sectors, as part of the process of policy development and
operational delivery. Details of Ministerial meetings with external
organisations and individuals are passed to the Cabinet Office on a quarterly
basis and are subsequently published on the Cabinet Office website, which is
available here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/home-office-mnisters-hospitality-data
There are no plans to change the law to recognise in English law Muslim
marriages and divorces which do not conform to the Marriage Act 1949.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many of her Department's (a) executive and (b) non-executive board members are (i) men and (ii) women;
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many of her Department's (a) executive and (b) non-executive board members are (i) men and (ii) women;
As at 31 March 2013 the (a) executive board members of the Home Office Supervisory Board were (i) 11 men and (ii) two women, and (b) non-executive board members were (i) two men and (ii) one woman.
As at 31 March 2013 the (a) executive board members of the Home Office Supervisory Board were (i) 60% white British and (ii) 0% Black or Minority Ethnic (we do not know the ethnicity of 40% of board members). (b) The ethnicity of non-executive board members is not collected.
(2) how many of her Department's (a) executive and (b) non-executive board members are identified as (i) white British and (ii) of black, Asian and other minority ethnic groups.
Mrs Hodgson:
(2) how many of her Department's (a) executive and (b) non-executive board members are identified as (i) white British and (ii) of black, Asian and other minority ethnic groups.
Mrs Hodgson:
As at 31 March 2013 the (a) executive board members of the Home Office Supervisory Board were (i) 11 men and (ii) two women, and (b) non-executive board members were (i) two men and (ii) one woman.
As at 31 March 2013 the (a) executive board members of the Home Office Supervisory Board were (i) 60% white British and (ii) 0% Black or Minority Ethnic (we do not know the ethnicity of 40% of board members). (b) The ethnicity of non-executive board members is not collected.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what the median gross pay is of staff in her Department and its Executive agencies in each pay band who are identified as (a) white British and (b) of black, Asian and other minority ethnic groups;
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what the median gross pay is of staff in her Department and its Executive agencies in each pay band who are identified as (a) white British and (b) of black, Asian and other minority ethnic groups;
The median gross pay of (a) men and (b) women in each pay band in the Home Office (core Department and Executive agencies) as at 31 March 2013 is shown in Table 1.
The median gross pay of (a) white employees and (b) minority ethnic employees in each pay band in the Home Office (core Department and Executive agencies) as at 31 March 2013 is shown in Table 2.
| Table
1: Home Office median gross pay by gender and pay band March
2013 | ||
| Median
pay
(£) | ||
| Grade
equivalency | (a)
Male | (b)
Female |
| AA | 15,105 | 15,105 |
| AO | 18,114 | 18,114 |
| EO | 26,079 | 25,778 |
| HEO | 31,306 | 30,997 |
| SEO | 39,674 | 40,220 |
| G7 | 54,362 | 54,239 |
| G6 | 67,259 | 66,077 |
| SCS | 81,247 | 75,888 |
| Notes: 1. Extract date: 1 April 2013. 2. Period covered: Data provided is as at 31 March 2013. 3. Organisational coverage: Figures include the core Home Office (including Border Force) and the Executive agencies as at 31 March 2013; UK Border Agency, HM Passport Office and the National Fraud Authority. 4. Employee coverage: Data includes all paid civil servants as at 31 March 2013. Data is provided by grade equivalency; each grade band includes the grade stated plus equivalents. 5. Transparency Agenda considerations: Median gross pay has been calculated using annualised, full-time equivalent basic salary plus London living allowance. This is consistent with the methodology used in the Home Office annual report and accounts 2012-13, previous PQ responses and the Employment Monitoring Report 2012-13. 6. Calculations: The median is the numerical value or quantity found at the mid-point of an ordered list of values or quantities (in this case salary). The median of a finite list of numbers can be found by arranging them from lowest to highest value and picking the middle one. If there is an even number of observations, and no single middle value; the median is then taken to be the mean of the two middle values. 7. Rounding: Figures have been rounded to the nearest pound. Source: Salary taken from P60 information from payroll and validated and cleansed against Data View-the Home Office’s single source of Office for National Statistics compliant monthly snapshot corporate Human Resources data. |
| Table
2: Home Office median gross pay by ethnicity and pay band March
2013 | ||
| Median
pay
(£) | ||
| Grade
equivalency | (a)
White | (b)
Minority
Ethnic |
| AA | 15,105 | 17,661 |
| AO | 17,877 | 20,367 |
| EO | 25,286 | 26,248 |
| HEO | 30,697 | 31,917 |
| SEO | 39,472 | 40,777 |
| G7 | 54,239 | 53,974 |
| G6 | 66,720 | 66,720 |
| SCS | 79,160 | 76,366 |
| Notes: 1. Extract date: 1 April 2013. 2. Period covered: Data provided is as at 31 March 2013. 3. Organisational coverage: Figures include the core Home Office (including Border Force) and the Executive agencies as at 31 March 2013; UK Border Agency, HM Passport Office and the National Fraud Authority. 4. Employee coverage: Data includes paid civil servants as at 31 March 2013. Data is provided by grade equivalency; each grade band includes the grade stated plus equivalents. Data is reported based on the Department's standard ethnicity groupings; white and minority ethnic. Only those employees who made a positive statement to diversity monitoring questions with regards to their ethnicity are included; those who did not respond or chose to "prefer not to say" are not included here. 5. Transparency Agenda considerations: Median gross pay has been calculated using annualised, full-time equivalent basic salary plus London living allowance. This is consistent with the methodology used in the Home Office annual report and accounts 2012-13, previous PQ responses and the Employment Monitoring Report 2012-13. 6. Calculations: The median is the numerical value or quantity found at the mid-point of an ordered list of values or quantities (in this case salary). The median of a finite list of numbers can be found by arranging them from lowest to highest value and picking the middle one. If there is an even number of observations, and no single middle value; the median is then taken to be the mean of the two middle values. 7. Rounding: Figures have been rounded to the nearest pound. Source: Salary taken from P60 information from payroll and validated and cleansed against Data View-the Home Office’s single source of Office for National Statistics compliant monthly snapshot corporate Human Resources data. |
(2) what the median gross pay of (a) men and (b) women is in each pay band in her Department.
Mrs Hodgson:
(2) what the median gross pay of (a) men and (b) women is in each pay band in her Department.
Mrs Hodgson:
The median gross pay of (a) men and (b) women in each pay band in the Home Office (core Department and Executive agencies) as at 31 March 2013 is shown in Table 1.
The median gross pay of (a) white employees and (b) minority ethnic employees in each pay band in the Home Office (core Department and Executive agencies) as at 31 March 2013 is shown in Table 2.
| Table
1: Home Office median gross pay by gender and pay band March
2013 | ||
| Median
pay
(£) | ||
| Grade
equivalency | (a)
Male | (b)
Female |
| AA | 15,105 | 15,105 |
| AO | 18,114 | 18,114 |
| EO | 26,079 | 25,778 |
| HEO | 31,306 | 30,997 |
| SEO | 39,674 | 40,220 |
| G7 | 54,362 | 54,239 |
| G6 | 67,259 | 66,077 |
| SCS | 81,247 | 75,888 |
| Notes: 1. Extract date: 1 April 2013. 2. Period covered: Data provided is as at 31 March 2013. 3. Organisational coverage: Figures include the core Home Office (including Border Force) and the Executive agencies as at 31 March 2013; UK Border Agency, HM Passport Office and the National Fraud Authority. 4. Employee coverage: Data includes all paid civil servants as at 31 March 2013. Data is provided by grade equivalency; each grade band includes the grade stated plus equivalents. 5. Transparency Agenda considerations: Median gross pay has been calculated using annualised, full-time equivalent basic salary plus London living allowance. This is consistent with the methodology used in the Home Office annual report and accounts 2012-13, previous PQ responses and the Employment Monitoring Report 2012-13. 6. Calculations: The median is the numerical value or quantity found at the mid-point of an ordered list of values or quantities (in this case salary). The median of a finite list of numbers can be found by arranging them from lowest to highest value and picking the middle one. If there is an even number of observations, and no single middle value; the median is then taken to be the mean of the two middle values. 7. Rounding: Figures have been rounded to the nearest pound. Source: Salary taken from P60 information from payroll and validated and cleansed against Data View-the Home Office’s single source of Office for National Statistics compliant monthly snapshot corporate Human Resources data. |
| Table
2: Home Office median gross pay by ethnicity and pay band March
2013 | ||
| Median
pay
(£) | ||
| Grade
equivalency | (a)
White | (b)
Minority
Ethnic |
| AA | 15,105 | 17,661 |
| AO | 17,877 | 20,367 |
| EO | 25,286 | 26,248 |
| HEO | 30,697 | 31,917 |
| SEO | 39,472 | 40,777 |
| G7 | 54,239 | 53,974 |
| G6 | 66,720 | 66,720 |
| SCS | 79,160 | 76,366 |
| Notes: 1. Extract date: 1 April 2013. 2. Period covered: Data provided is as at 31 March 2013. 3. Organisational coverage: Figures include the core Home Office (including Border Force) and the Executive agencies as at 31 March 2013; UK Border Agency, HM Passport Office and the National Fraud Authority. 4. Employee coverage: Data includes paid civil servants as at 31 March 2013. Data is provided by grade equivalency; each grade band includes the grade stated plus equivalents. Data is reported based on the Department's standard ethnicity groupings; white and minority ethnic. Only those employees who made a positive statement to diversity monitoring questions with regards to their ethnicity are included; those who did not respond or chose to "prefer not to say" are not included here. 5. Transparency Agenda considerations: Median gross pay has been calculated using annualised, full-time equivalent basic salary plus London living allowance. This is consistent with the methodology used in the Home Office annual report and accounts 2012-13, previous PQ responses and the Employment Monitoring Report 2012-13. 6. Calculations: The median is the numerical value or quantity found at the mid-point of an ordered list of values or quantities (in this case salary). The median of a finite list of numbers can be found by arranging them from lowest to highest value and picking the middle one. If there is an even number of observations, and no single middle value; the median is then taken to be the mean of the two middle values. 7. Rounding: Figures have been rounded to the nearest pound. Source: Salary taken from P60 information from payroll and validated and cleansed against Data View-the Home Office’s single source of Office for National Statistics compliant monthly snapshot corporate Human Resources data. |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what proportion of staff recruited to her Department since 5 May 2010 were (a) men and (b) women.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what proportion of staff recruited to her Department since 5 May 2010 were (a) men and (b) women.
The Home Office has recruited 2,177 staff since 5 May 2010—52.37% were male and 47.63% were female.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many complaints of discrimination related to pregnancy or maternity have been lodged against employees of her Department or its executive agencies by (a) current employees and (b) prospective employees in each of the last five years; and how...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many complaints of discrimination related to pregnancy or maternity have been lodged against employees of her Department or its executive agencies by (a) current employees and (b) prospective employees in each of the last five years; and how...
The information is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
(2) how many complaints of age discrimination or harassment have been lodged against employees of her Department or its executive agencies by (a) employees and (b) other individuals in each of the last five years; and how many of those complaints resulted in disciplinary action;
Mrs Hodgson:
(2) how many complaints of age discrimination or harassment have been lodged against employees of her Department or its executive agencies by (a) employees and (b) other individuals in each of the last five years; and how many of those complaints resulted in disciplinary action;
Mrs Hodgson:
The information is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
(3) how many complaints of racial discrimination or harassment have been lodged against employees of her Department or its executive agencies by (a) employees and (b) other individuals in each of the last five years; and how many such complaints resulted in disciplinary action;
Mrs Hodgson:
(3) how many complaints of racial discrimination or harassment have been lodged against employees of her Department or its executive agencies by (a) employees and (b) other individuals in each of the last five years; and how many such complaints resulted in disciplinary action;
Mrs Hodgson:
The information is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
(4) how many complaints of sexual discrimination or harassment have been lodged against employees of her Department or its executive agencies by (a) employees and (b) other individuals in each of the last five years; and how many such complaints resulted in disciplinary action;
Mrs Hodgson:
(4) how many complaints of sexual discrimination or harassment have been lodged against employees of her Department or its executive agencies by (a) employees and (b) other individuals in each of the last five years; and how many such complaints resulted in disciplinary action;
Mrs Hodgson:
The information is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
(5) how many complaints of disability discrimination or harassment have been lodged against employees of her Department or its executive agencies by (a) employees and (b) other individuals in each of the last five years; and how many such complaints resulted in disciplinary action;
Mrs Hodgson:
(5) how many complaints of disability discrimination or harassment have been lodged against employees of her Department or its executive agencies by (a) employees and (b) other individuals in each of the last five years; and how many such complaints resulted in disciplinary action;
Mrs Hodgson:
The information is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
(6) how many complaints of homophobic or transphobic discrimination or harassment have been lodged against employees of her Department or its executive agencies by (a) employees and (b) other individuals in each of the last five years; and how many such complaints resulted in disciplinary action.
Mrs Hodgson:
(6) how many complaints of homophobic or transphobic discrimination or harassment have been lodged against employees of her Department or its executive agencies by (a) employees and (b) other individuals in each of the last five years; and how many such complaints resulted in disciplinary action.
Mrs Hodgson:
The information is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
To ask the Secretary of State for the (1) Home Department what proportion of employees in her Department is (a) white British and (b) black, Asian and from other minority ethnic groups, by each Civil Service pay grade;
To ask the Secretary of State for the (1) Home Department what proportion of employees in her Department is (a) white British and (b) black, Asian and from other minority ethnic groups, by each Civil Service pay grade;
The Home Office data showing the proportion of (a) female and (b) male staff by each Civil Service pay scale are shown in the table A.
The Home Office data showing the proportion of (a) white British and (b) black, Asian and minority ethnic staff, by each civil service pay are shown in table B.
| Table
A: Gender table (end of October
2013) | ||||||||
| Percentage | ||||||||
| Gender | 1.
AA-AO | 2.
EO | 3.
HEO-SEO | 4.
G7-G6 | 5.
SCS PB
1 | 6.
SCS PB
2+ | All
SCS | All
staff
total |
| Female | 59.96 | 49.92 | 47.86 | 44.41 | 35.00 | 23.81 | 32.42 | 51.84 |
| Male | 40.04 | 50.08 | 52.14 | 55.59 | 65.00 | 76.19 | 67.58 | 48.16 |
| Table
B: Ethnicity table (end of October
2013) | ||||||||
| Percentage | ||||||||
| Ethnicity
target | 1.
AA-AO | 2.
EO | 3.
HEO-SEO | 4.
G7-G6 | 5.
SCS PB
1 | 6.
SCS PB
2+ | All
SCS | All
staff
total |
| Minority
ethnic | 26.12 | 25.93 | 18.90 | 11.19 | 7.03 | 0.00 | 5.33 | 23.21 |
| White | 73.88 | 74.07 | 81.10 | 88.81 | 92.97 | 100.00 | 94.67 | 76.79 |
| Data
source: Data View—the Home Office's single source of Office for National Statistics compliant monthly snapshot corporate Human Resources data. Extraction date: 1 November 2013. Organisational coverage: Figures include core Home Office (including the former UK Border Agency and Border Force) and the executive agencies; Her Majesty's Passport Office and National Fraud Authority. Employee coverage: Data are based on the headcount of all current, permanent and paid civil servants, who had made a positive declaration regarding disability. With the exception of the senior civil service, Government Departments have delegated pay and grading. For statistical purposes Departments are asked to map their grades to a common framework by responsibility level as per Office of National Statistics definitions. This table shows staff at their substantive responsibility level. |
(2) what proportion of employees in her Department are (a) female and (b) male, by each Civil Service pay grade.
Mrs Hodgson:
(2) what proportion of employees in her Department are (a) female and (b) male, by each Civil Service pay grade.
Mrs Hodgson:
The Home Office data showing the proportion of (a) female and (b) male staff by each Civil Service pay scale are shown in the table A.
The Home Office data showing the proportion of (a) white British and (b) black, Asian and minority ethnic staff, by each civil service pay are shown in table B.
| Table
A: Gender table (end of October
2013) | ||||||||
| Percentage | ||||||||
| Gender | 1.
AA-AO | 2.
EO | 3.
HEO-SEO | 4.
G7-G6 | 5.
SCS PB
1 | 6.
SCS PB
2+ | All
SCS | All
staff
total |
| Female | 59.96 | 49.92 | 47.86 | 44.41 | 35.00 | 23.81 | 32.42 | 51.84 |
| Male | 40.04 | 50.08 | 52.14 | 55.59 | 65.00 | 76.19 | 67.58 | 48.16 |
| Table
B: Ethnicity table (end of October
2013) | ||||||||
| Percentage | ||||||||
| Ethnicity
target | 1.
AA-AO | 2.
EO | 3.
HEO-SEO | 4.
G7-G6 | 5.
SCS PB
1 | 6.
SCS PB
2+ | All
SCS | All
staff
total |
| Minority
ethnic | 26.12 | 25.93 | 18.90 | 11.19 | 7.03 | 0.00 | 5.33 | 23.21 |
| White | 73.88 | 74.07 | 81.10 | 88.81 | 92.97 | 100.00 | 94.67 | 76.79 |
| Data
source: Data View—the Home Office's single source of Office for National Statistics compliant monthly snapshot corporate Human Resources data. Extraction date: 1 November 2013. Organisational coverage: Figures include core Home Office (including the former UK Border Agency and Border Force) and the executive agencies; Her Majesty's Passport Office and National Fraud Authority. Employee coverage: Data are based on the headcount of all current, permanent and paid civil servants, who had made a positive declaration regarding disability. With the exception of the senior civil service, Government Departments have delegated pay and grading. For statistical purposes Departments are asked to map their grades to a common framework by responsibility level as per Office of National Statistics definitions. This table shows staff at their substantive responsibility level. |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what proportion of employees in her Department have a physical or learning disability, by each Civil Service pay grade.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what proportion of employees in her Department have a physical or learning disability, by each Civil Service pay grade.
The Home Office data on disability cannot be broken down into physical or learning disability. Data showing the proportion of disabled and non-disabled staff by pay scale is in the following table:
| Data
to end of October
2013 | ||||||||
| Percentage | ||||||||
| Disability
target | 1.
AA-AO | 2.
EO | 3.
HEO-SEO | 4.
G7-G6 | 5.
SCS
PB1 | 6.
SCS
PB2+ | All
SCS | All
staff
total |
| Disabled | 10.57 | 8.72 | 8.82 | 6.30 | 6.15 | 5.00 | 5.88 | 9.11 |
| Non-disabled | 89.43 | 91.28 | 91.18 | 93.70 | 93.85 | 95.00 | 94.12 | 90.89 |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many claims at employment tribunals have been lodged against her Department on the grounds of pregnancy or maternity discrimination in each of the last five years; and how many such cases were found against her Department.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many claims at employment tribunals have been lodged against her Department on the grounds of pregnancy or maternity discrimination in each of the last five years; and how many such cases were found against her Department.
The Home Office reporting systems do not report on maternity/pregnancy related claims specifically. Instead all gender related claims are grouped together under the terminology of sex discrimination. The number of claims for sex discrimination over the past five years can be found in the following table.
Over the past five years no sex discrimination cases were upheld against the Home Office.
| Sex
discrimination cases by
year | |
| Total | |
| 2008 | 1 |
| 2009 | 4 |
| 2010 | 10 |
| 2011 | 9 |
| 2012 | 9 |
| 2013 | 5 |
| Total | 38 |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if she will place in the Library a copy of the reports prepared for her Department by Operation Podium on ticket fraud and the secondary ticketing market;
[140107]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if she will place in the Library a copy of the reports prepared for her Department by Operation Podium on ticket fraud and the secondary ticketing market;
[140107]
A range of assessments of threats to the Olympic and Paralympic Games were provided to the Government to inform the Olympic security strategy and its successful delivery. This included reporting from the Operation Podium team in the Metropolitan police, and from other police forces and law enforcement
agencies, regarding serious and organised crime. These reports contain sensitive information which cannot be published, even though the Games are over. I am unable, therefore, to place the reports in the House Library.
Home Office Ministers and officials met regularly with senior members of the Metropolitan police over several years running up to the Olympic and Paralympic Games, and daily during the Games themselves. The Home Office funded and supported the work undertaken by Operation Podium, which undertook preventative and investigative work to stop criminals illegally profiting from the Games.
Home Office officials have remained in contact with the Operation Podium team to ensure that the lessons learned from securing this major event can be applied to other events in the future.
(2) when (a) she, (b) Ministers in her Department and (c) officials in her Department have met officers from Operation Podium to discuss the issue of ticket fraud and the secondary ticketing market since the start of that operation; and what the outcome has been of any such meeting.
[140203]
Mrs Hodgson:
(2) when (a) she, (b) Ministers in her Department and (c) officials in her Department have met officers from Operation Podium to discuss the issue of ticket fraud and the secondary ticketing market since the start of that operation; and what the outcome has been of any such meeting.
[140203]
Mrs Hodgson:
A range of assessments of threats to the Olympic and Paralympic Games were provided to the Government to inform the Olympic security strategy and its successful delivery. This included reporting from the Operation Podium team in the Metropolitan police, and from other police forces and law enforcement
agencies, regarding serious and organised crime. These reports contain sensitive information which cannot be published, even though the Games are over. I am unable, therefore, to place the reports in the House Library.
Home Office Ministers and officials met regularly with senior members of the Metropolitan police over several years running up to the Olympic and Paralympic Games, and daily during the Games themselves. The Home Office funded and supported the work undertaken by Operation Podium, which undertook preventative and investigative work to stop criminals illegally profiting from the Games.
Home Office officials have remained in contact with the Operation Podium team to ensure that the lessons learned from securing this major event can be applied to other events in the future.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people were arrested on suspicion of illegally reselling tickets for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games in each month of 2012.
[120059]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people were arrested on suspicion of illegally reselling tickets for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games in each month of 2012.
[120059]
The Metropolitan Police have advised that between 25 July and 17 August 2012, a total of 220 individuals were arrested for Olympic ticketing offences as part of Operation Podium, the dedicated police operation against Games-related economic crime. Figures for arrests prior to the start of the Games or which were not part of Operation Podium are not held centrally in this form.