1-20 of 26 results for subject:Disqualification
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.21 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.009 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Disqualification
- We searched for
- subject_t:Disqualification OR subject_t:"Disqualification orders" OR subject_t:Disqualifications OR subject_ses:90937
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many disqualification undertakings have been received by his Department from company directors since 1 April 2003.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many disqualification undertakings have been received by his Department from company directors since 1 April 2003.
| Number | |
| 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 | 1,154 |
| 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2005 | 950 |
| 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006 | 906 |
| 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2007 | 954 |
| 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008 | 897 |
| 1 April 2008 to 19 May 2009 | 127 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many disqualification orders have been made against directors under the Company Directors' Disqualification Act 1986 for a period of (a) two years and (b) more than two years in each year since 2002.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many disqualification orders have been made against directors under the Company Directors' Disqualification Act 1986 for a period of (a) two years and (b) more than two years in each year since 2002.
| Two years | Above two years | |
| 1 April to 31 March 2007 | 13 | 233 |
| 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008 | 12 | 236 |
| 1 April 2008 to 19 May 2008 | 0 | 20 |
| Number | |
| 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2003 | 319 |
| 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 | 213 |
| 1 April 2004 to 31 march 2005 | 290 |
| 1 April 2005 to 31 march 2006 | 267 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many adverse reports required under the Company Directors' Disqualification Act 1986 have been received by his Department concerning the conduct of directors in each year since 2002.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many adverse reports required under the Company Directors' Disqualification Act 1986 have been received by his Department concerning the conduct of directors in each year since 2002.
| Number | |
| 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2003 | 3,539 |
| 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 | 3,394 |
| 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2005 | 3,860 |
| 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006 | 3,721 |
| 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2007 | 4,107 |
| 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008 | 3,991 |
| 1 April 2008 to 16 May 2009 | 606 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, pursuant to her Answer of 13th January, 304 c251W, if she will estimate how many of the (a) lifetime and (b) renewable disability living allowance awards disallowed, (i) were transferred to income support and housing benefit, (ii) became dependent on partners...
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, pursuant to her Answer of 13th January, 304 c251W, if she will estimate how many of the (a) lifetime and (b) renewable disability living allowance awards disallowed, (i) were transferred to income support and housing benefit, (ii) became dependent on partners...
If she will review the legal action against some of the former directors of Astra Holdings commenced under the previous administration.
If she will review the legal action against some of the former directors of Astra Holdings commenced under the previous administration.
If he will suspend or withdraw his prosecutions of former directors of Astra until the HM Customs and Excise inquiry into Astra and its subsidiaries is complete.
If he will suspend or withdraw his prosecutions of former directors of Astra until the HM Customs and Excise inquiry into Astra and its subsidiaries is complete.
When the decision to prosecute all but one of the former directors of Astra was taken; if he was consulted over the decision to prosecute; and what factors led to the decision not to prosecute the remaining director.
When the decision to prosecute all but one of the former directors of Astra was taken; if he was consulted over the decision to prosecute; and what factors led to the decision not to prosecute the remaining director.
From which honourable Members he has received correspondence or representations about the investigations into the conduct of, and ultimate prosecution of some of the former directors of Astra. - Inc list.
From which honourable Members he has received correspondence or representations about the investigations into the conduct of, and ultimate prosecution of some of the former directors of Astra. - Inc list.
If his changes in the Insolvency Service affect the powers (a) to prosecute for fraud, (b) to disqualify directors and (c) to prosecute in situations of bankruptcy; and if he will comment on the rights of private contractors to initiate prosecution and disqualifications.
If his changes in the Insolvency Service affect the powers (a) to prosecute for fraud, (b) to disqualify directors and (c) to prosecute in situations of bankruptcy; and if he will comment on the rights of private contractors to initiate prosecution and disqualifications.
How many cases were reported to his Department's Disqualification Unit for each year since 1987 which failed to come before the court because they had exceeded the statutory limitation period. - Inc table.
How many cases were reported to his Department's Disqualification Unit for each year since 1987 which failed to come before the court because they had exceeded the statutory limitation period. - Inc table.
How many cases have been reported to his Department's Disqualification Unit in each year since 1987; how many of these have been subject to full investigation; and how many have been successfully prosecuted. - Inc table.
How many cases have been reported to his Department's Disqualification Unit in each year since 1987; how many of these have been subject to full investigation; and how many have been successfully prosecuted. - Inc table.
What was the average length of time taken to investigate a case reported to his Department's Disqualification Unit in each year since 1987; and what was the median time taken to investigate such reports.
What was the average length of time taken to investigate a case reported to his Department's Disqualification Unit in each year since 1987; and what was the median time taken to investigate such reports.
What is the full complement of staff in his Department's Disqualification Unit; and how many are currently in post. - Figs given.
What is the full complement of staff in his Department's Disqualification Unit; and how many are currently in post. - Figs given.
How many reports and complaints of the unfit conduct of directors were submitted to the insolvency service in 1991 and 1992; and how many disqualification orders against directors were made in 1991 and 1992. - Including figures. (Holding answer 8.2.93).
How many reports and complaints of the unfit conduct of directors were submitted to the insolvency service in 1991 and 1992; and how many disqualification orders against directors were made in 1991 and 1992. - Including figures. (Holding answer 8.2.93).
What has been the caseload of the Insolvency Service in each year since 1989 and the average processing time per case each year since 1989. - Inc tables.
What has been the caseload of the Insolvency Service in each year since 1989 and the average processing time per case each year since 1989. - Inc tables.
How many complaints about the unfit conduct of directors were submitted to the Insolvency Service in 1990 and 1991; in how many cases legal proceedings were undertaken; and in how many cases disqualification orders were made. - Inc figures.
How many complaints about the unfit conduct of directors were submitted to the Insolvency Service in 1990 and 1991; in how many cases legal proceedings were undertaken; and in how many cases disqualification orders were made. - Inc figures.
On how many occasions the powers under the Estate Agents Act 1979 have been used to prohibit unfit persons from doing estate agency work. - Inc figures.
On how many occasions the powers under the Estate Agents Act 1979 have been used to prohibit unfit persons from doing estate agency work. - Inc figures.
How many reports and complaints of the unfit conduct of directors were submitted to the Insolvency Service in 1990; in how many cases legal proceedings were undertaken; and how many disqualification orders against directors were made in 1990. - Figures given.
How many reports and complaints of the unfit conduct of directors were submitted to the Insolvency Service in 1990; in how many cases legal proceedings were undertaken; and how many disqualification orders against directors were made in 1990. - Figures given.
How many directors were disqualified under companies and financial services legislation in each year since 1980; and in how many cases his Department's inspectors reports were a material factor in the disqualification. - Includes tables & fact that disqualification orders made are noted in report on companies, pursuant to section...
How many directors were disqualified under companies and financial services legislation in each year since 1980; and in how many cases his Department's inspectors reports were a material factor in the disqualification. - Includes tables & fact that disqualification orders made are noted in report on companies, pursuant to section...
What is total no of claims of unemployment-related benefits disallowed by adjudication officers in each standard region of UK for each year since 1980, broken down by each category of disallowance in a manner consistent with annual report of chief adjudication officer.
What is total no of claims of unemployment-related benefits disallowed by adjudication officers in each standard region of UK for each year since 1980, broken down by each category of disallowance in a manner consistent with annual report of chief adjudication officer.