Skip to main content

1-18 of 18 results for subject:"Disclosure of information"

Member X
Sarah Olney
Subject X
Equality

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Olney, Sarah (18)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Equality (18)
More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

No, I do not think so. Forty-eight hours is a reasonable amount of notice in any sector. That is the kind of notice that enables, for example, parents to rearrange childcare, or other members of the family to rearrange their shifts. The 48 hours is a proper definition of reasonable...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2025
Reference
772 c1224
House
House of Commons

As someone with a long history of having to arrange childcare at short notice, I am well aware of the limitations that needing to arrange childcare presents, particularly for working women, both those who are single parents and those in a relationship. Forty-eight hours is not ideal, but it is...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2025
Reference
772 c1224
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. The current framework for whistleblowing applies only if somebody has lost their job. It does not address the duty on businesses to follow up whistleblowers’ serious concerns about crimes. That urgently needs to be addressed.

Too many whistleblowers who raised serious concerns about matters ranging...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2025
Reference
772 cc1224-5
House
House of Commons

No, I do not. I think that people should have the freedom not to join a trade union if that is what they wish, not least because their trade union contributions might go to a party that they do not vote for. Many professions these days are better represented not...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2025
Reference
772 c1225
House
House of Commons

I understand the hon. Lady’s point, but a fellow qualified accountant would be better able to advise somebody facing a disciplinary than an official from a general trade union, who would not necessarily understand the points in dispute.

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2025
Reference
772 c1225
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Gentleman and the hon. Member for Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch (Katrina Murray) have said, that has not been a requirement for professional bodies, but if we create the right for suitably qualified professionals to accompany employees, I fully expect that those bodies would go on to develop that...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2025
Reference
772 c1226
House
House of Commons

I am slightly surprised to be referred to as “hon. Friend”, not least because I am probably going to disagree with the hon. Gentleman. To undertake such massive action, including in the NHS, and on the tube—we saw the level of disruption that that caused the public last week—there needs...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2025
Reference
772 c1226
House
House of Commons

I am happy to take another intervention.

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2025
Reference
772 c1226
House
House of Commons

I think the point that the hon. Gentleman is making is that people who did not express a view either way should be counted as voting against. What I am saying is that in order to justify the levels of disruption that strike action has caused recently, it is important...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2025
Reference
772 c1227
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Lady supported Lords amendment 1, the catering worker would have a right to request, and could get the certainty she requires. The amendment would very much offer that right, which she currently does not have, but it would also mean there was no requirement on the employer...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2025
Reference
772 c1223
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Ellesmere Port and Bromborough (Justin Madders), and to hear his passion for the Bill; I wish him every success. I also welcome the new Secretary of State for Business and Trade to his place. I look forward to opposing him.

The...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2025
Reference
772 c1222
House
House of Commons

It is a privilege to be called at this stage in the debate. My principal reason for voting against the Bill on Second Reading was my concern that vulnerable people would be put at risk. I agreed to serve on the Bill Committee to do what I could to allay...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1249
House
House of Commons

I will not, if that is okay.

We were told that it was not practical to produce such an assessment until after Committee stage, as it would be necessary to assess the impact of amendments made in Committee.

The equality impact assessment was finally published five weeks ago. I have to say...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 cc1249-1250
House
House of Commons

I welcome that intervention. I spoke extensively about the Bill’s impact on anorexic people, and I am not satisfied that those concerns have been addressed.

I am pleased to support amendment 21 tabled by my good friend, colleague and constituency neighbour, my hon. Friend the Member for Twickenham (Munira Wilson), which...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 cc1250-1
House
House of Commons

I am sorry, but I will make some progress.

In a similar vein, I plan to support the amendments in the name of the right hon. Member for Tonbridge (Tom Tugendhat), which seek to remove all Henry VIII powers from the Bill and from the amendments introduced by the hon. Member...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 cc1251-2
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member calls me to speak. If we do not know, it is probably because those other nations are not collecting the data. My position is that we should be collecting the data, which is why hon. Members should vote for my new clause 19.

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1253
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if he will make his policy to require venture capital firms to (a) record and (b) publish the diversity of founders receiving investment.

Asked by
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 April 2025
Reference
45742
House
House of Commons

It is always a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for South Ribble (Katherine Fletcher), as I recall I did when she made her maiden speech. I rise to speak in support of new clause 4 tabled by the hon. Member for Huntingdon (Mr Djanogly), who I know is scheduled...

Member
Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2020
Reference
678 cc1915-6
House
House of Commons