Skip to main content

1-12 of 12 results for subject:"Repossession orders"

Member X
Lord Keen of Elie

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Keen of Elie, Lord (12)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords report stage third day. Amendment 87 agreed to on division (237 to 223). Amendment 88 agreed to. Amendment 98 disagreed to on division (215 to 240). Amendment 106 agreed to on division (282 to 158). Amendment 110 disagreed to on division (98 to 148). Amendment 111 agreed to on...

Lead member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage
Answering member
Lord Keen of Elie; Baroness Scott of Bybrook; Lord Jamieson
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Scottish and Welsh legislative consent granted.
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1722-1800
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Keen of Elie

87: Clause 41, page 58, line 4, leave out “on the balance of probabilities” and insert “beyond reasonable doubt”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment, in conjunction with another amendment in the name of Lord Keen of Elie to clause 58, imposes a uniform standard of proof – beyond...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1723
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by referring to my interests as recorded in the register. I add that I am the proprietor of properties in London that are the subject of tenancy agreements and are managed by an agent.

In this group we have Amendments 87 and 88 in similar terms. Amendment...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1723-4
House
House of Lords

I am obliged to noble Lords for their contributions to this debate. I make a number of observations. First, I sympathise with the observations made by the noble Baroness, Lady Kennedy, about the conduct of those she identifies as criminal landlords. But before someone should be stigmatised and identified as...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1735
House
House of Lords

I do not accept the proposition advanced by the noble Baroness at all. In circumstances where you are going to stigmatise somebody’s conduct as criminal, as the noble Baroness, Lady Kennedy, pointed out, it is appropriate that there should be a relevant standard of proof. You are not taking away...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1735-6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Keen of Elie

88: Clause 58, page 90, line 33, leave out “on the balance of probabilities” and insert “beyond reasonable doubt”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment, in conjunction with another amendment in the name of Lord Keen of Elie name to clause 41, imposes a uniform standard of proof –...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1736
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Keen of Elie

89: Clause 59, page 92, line 18, leave out “£40,000” and insert “£7,000”

Member’s explanatory statement

This limits the local housing authority’s power to impose a financial penalty to £7,000.

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1736
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 89 is to Clause 59 and addresses the question of the penalty proposed in that provision, which is £40,000. Under the amendment, that would revert to the same level of penalty for other provisions in the Bill of £7,000, on the basis that £40,000 is simply excessive.

If...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1736
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am obliged to all who have contributed to this aspect of the debate, and to the Minister for her explanation. On the financial provisions and our pursuant Amendments 89, 92 and 101, I will not insist on those amendments. I comment merely that, in my noble friend’s...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1745
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to ensure that courts deal more speedily with landlord and tenant cases concerning anti-social behaviour and domestic violence, once possession cases related to rented housing recommence.

Asked by
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2020
Reference
HL5963
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many possession orders had been made by the courts following a claim by (1) private, and (2) social landlords, and were outstanding prior to eviction proceedings being suspended from 27 March.

Asked by
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2020
Reference
HL5964
House
House of Lords

Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact on legal aid firms of (1) the stay on possession proceedings for tenants until the end of August, and (2) any subsequent substantial loss of income; and what steps they are taking to ensure that such firms are paid...

Asked by
Baroness Whitaker (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 June 2020
Reference
HL5501
House
House of Lords