Skip to main content

1-8 of 8 results for subject:Enforcement

Member X
Kirsty Blackman
Subject X
Devolution

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Blackman, Kirsty (8)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Devolution (8)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

It is great to hear the thoughtful contributions from that Tory Bench, although not from the Treasury Bench, I hasten to add. The hon. Member for Amber Valley (Nigel Mills) and I have spoken in many debates together, and I always appreciate his forensic assessments of the details in the...

Member
Kirsty Blackman (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 September 2021
Reference
701 cc358-9
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. If we as a country can suddenly renege on our international obligations and agreements, why cannot Scotland hold an independence referendum next week? The UK has agreed to these agreements and it would be great, when the Minister speaks at the end of the debate, if he could explain...

Member
Kirsty Blackman (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 September 2021
Reference
701 c359
House
House of Commons

Principle F rejects that, so which one has primacy? Which one is the most important? If they directly disagree with each other, is it more important that we can do what is said in principle A or is it more important that we can do what is said in principle...

Member
Kirsty Blackman (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 September 2021
Reference
701 c360
House
House of Commons

Freeports are not covered by the subsidy regime we are talking about today. They are a separate thing. I can say from the Back Benches that I am not particularly keen on freeports, but the idea is that there is a wall around the port—the guidance specifically says that there...

Member
Kirsty Blackman (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 September 2021
Reference
701 c360
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. We need to replicate the good things we had in the EU, the things that supported different areas. A system has been put in place to ensure

that different parliamentary constituencies can get money from the UK Government, but it is super-interesting that the constituencies the Government have chosen...

Member
Kirsty Blackman (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 September 2021
Reference
701 cc360-2
House
House of Commons

Even if that were in the Bill, I am concerned that it is not in the competence of this place to change that unilaterally without having a discussion with the European Union.

Member
Kirsty Blackman (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 September 2021
Reference
701 c367
House
House of Commons

I honestly do not have a view on whether it is a good or bad thing. I am just utterly confused, because I do not think that the Government have the power to do it. I want to know what they mean so that I can work out whether I...

Member
Kirsty Blackman (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 September 2021
Reference
701 c368
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that, in fact, the Bill does the opposite of levelling up, in that it refuses to allow anything to happen in disadvantaged areas that will disadvantage rich areas? That is how the Bill is written—it is in schedule 1F.

Member
Kirsty Blackman (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 September 2021
Reference
701 c353
House
House of Commons