Skip to main content

1-20 of 30 results for subject:Marriage

Member X
Stephen Doughty

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Doughty, Stephen (30)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what the Government's policy is on equal marriage in the Cayman Islands and the other UK Overseas Territories where it is currently not permitted.

Asked by
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 November 2022
Reference
74690
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has my wholehearted support on this Bill, not least as a proud devolutionist. I represent Wales and I am proud of our devolution settlement. We all want to see the devolved Administration functioning again in Northern Ireland. The very patient, calm and constructive way in which he...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2019
Reference
663 c88
House
House of Commons

That this House notes that under the terms of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013, provisions are made for the marriages of same sex couples performed in England, Scotland and Wales to be treated as civil partnerships, and thus the spouses to be treated and referred to as civil...

Primary sponsor
Ged Killen (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Early day motions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
760
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the result of the Australian marriage equality survey which had a resounding result for the yes campaign with 61.6 per cent in favour; notes that the turnout for the survey was 79.5 per cent, higher than that of the 2017 general election or EU referendum turnout;...

Primary sponsor
Lloyd Russell-Moyle (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Early day motions
Date
14 November 2017
Reference
540
House
House of Commons

That this House recognises the great step forward which India has taken in ending child marriage; acknowledges that according to UNICEF in India 47 per cent of women are married before they are 18 years old and 18 per cent by the age of 15, while the age of consent...

Primary sponsor
Virendra Sharma (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
17 October 2017
Reference
417
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport whether couples who registered for a civil partnership before the date of commencement of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 was known but whose ceremonies are due to take place after commencement of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples)...

Asked by
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 January 2014
Reference
184905; 574 cc556-7W
House
House of Commons

I concur with the Minister on the Equality Act. Indeed, I referred to it a number of times in Committee and have done so in debates in the House. Is it not the case that the Equality Act balances protected characteristics, such as those of religious belief and sexuality?

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1028
House
House of Commons

I totally concur with the points my right hon. Friend is making about humanist marriage, and I am glad the Government came back with amendments on this issue. Does she agree that there are important protections in the amendments made in the other place to prevent the possibility of crazy...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1034
House
House of Commons

It is a genuine pleasure to be able to speak on such an historic occasion. The fact that we are discussing a relevantly small, concise and consensual group of Lords amendments shows the extent of the scrutiny that the Bill has received in both Houses, as well as the clear...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 cc1044-5
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. That is the point that has come out in all the debates.

We have also seen protections for those who disagree. The hon. Member for Enfield, Southgate seems happy with those. I felt that protection already existed, but if the additional protections please other people and make them feel more...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 cc1045-6
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1046
House
House of Commons

Thank you for bringing us back into order, Mr Speaker.

At an earlier stage I suggested that we might want to recognise the celebrations that have taken place elsewhere, such as in New Zealand, with lots of singing. We are wearing our carnations tonight, and I would be very happy to...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1046
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is making some strong points. Anecdotally, in my constituency, a former member of the Welsh Assembly who is a humanist celebrant tells me that from her experience, if the provisions were made legal, the numbers would increase. She certainly sees a demand from the people of Cardiff...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 May 2013
Reference
563 c1111
House
House of Commons

I commend the work of the Bill Committee in examining the Bill in great detail and subjecting it to close scrutiny. It heard from many expert witnesses who discussed many of the issues before us today in the amendments that have been selected, so I would not want to leave...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2013
Reference
563 c924
House
House of Commons

I want to re-emphasise the point that the Bill received detailed, respectful and expert scrutiny in Committee, in contrast to the objections expressed by Government Members. I appreciated the scrutiny that the hon. Member for Enfield, Southgate (Mr Burrowes) gave to the Bill and we all listened to it extremely...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2013
Reference
563 c932
House
House of Commons

I believe in freedom of speech in this country and in people’s ability to say what they want. It has been made clear that no further was action was taken in that case, and the person was not prosecuted. I believe in that and in people in this House being...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2013
Reference
563 c932
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that intervention.

I wish to draw the House’s attention to the verbal and written evidence presented by Lord Pannick, which I think addressed many of the concerns expressed by the

hon. Member for Enfield, Southgate and other members of the Committee regarding the protections and legal...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2013
Reference
563 cc932-3
House
House of Commons

I totally agree with my right hon. Friend. The Education Secretary made his point clearly and was put under detailed scrutiny by Government Members.

I have held conversations with members of the Church of England and the Church in Wales since the Public Bill Committee, and they seem reassured by a...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2013
Reference
563 c933
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. I agree with my hon. Friend and we heard passionate evidence from school representatives on issues of homophobic bullying and

the position of LGBT staff. I believe that a dangerous precedent would be set by giving special exemptions to registrars in particular, and for state employees not to have...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2013
Reference
563 c933
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Gentleman. I should point out that registrars have never previously been given opt-outs, including on performing civil partnerships or re-marrying divorcees, even on the grounds of profoundly held religious beliefs. There is an important distinction to be made.

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2013
Reference
563 c934
House
House of Commons