Skip to main content

1-11 of 11 results for subject:"Information Commissioner's Office"

Member X
Baroness Kidron
Subject X
Safety

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Kidron, Baroness (11)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Safety (11)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I start by thanking the noble Lord, Lord Nash, for his openness, his campaigning and his extraordinary ability to bring different views together. This morning, he and I agreed that, whatever the outcome of this particular conversation, we would work continuously and ferociously for child safety in the...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
855 cc1075-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 135 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Bethell, to which I have added my name. He set out our struggle during the passage of the Online Safety Bill, when we made several attempts to get something along these lines into the Bill. It...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 April 2024
Reference
837 cc271-3GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I could encourage the Minister to say at least whether he is concerned that a lack of evidence might be impacting on the codes and powers that we have given to Ofcom in order to create the regime. I share his slight regret that Ofcom does not have this...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 April 2024
Reference
837 c277GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 142, 143 and 150 in my name, and I thank other noble Lords for their support.

We have spent considerable time across the digital Bills—the online safety, digital markets and data Bills—talking about the speed at which industry moves and the corresponding need for...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 April 2024
Reference
837 cc297-9GC
House
House of Lords

We had this debate during the passage of the Online Safety Act. In the end, we all agreed—the House, including the Government, came to the view—that two and a half years, which is 18 months plus a transition period, was an almost egregious amount of time considering the rate at...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 April 2024
Reference
837 c303GC
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, I would very much welcome a meeting, as the noble Baroness, Lady Harding, suggested. I do not think it is useful for me to keep standing up and saying, “You are watering down the code”, and for the Minister to stand up and say, “Oh...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 April 2024
Reference
837 c304GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Kidron

146: After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—

“Code of practice on EdTech

(1) The Commissioner must prepare a code of practice in consultation with the Department for Education and in accordance with sections 33 and 34 of this Act which contains such guidance as the Commissioner considers appropriate...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 April 2024
Reference
837 c306GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 146 is in my name and those of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, and the noble Baronesses, Lady Harding and Lady Jones; I thank them all for their support. Before

I set out the amendment that would provide a code of practice for edtech and why it...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 April 2024
Reference
837 cc306-310GC
House
House of Lords

I thank everyone who spoke, particularly for making it absolutely clear that not one of us, including myself, is against edtech. We just want it to be fair and want the rules to be adequate.

I am particularly grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, for detailing what education data includes....

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 April 2024
Reference
837 cc314-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also welcome the new commissioner, John Edwards, to his role, and congratulate the Government on this week’s announcement that the online safety Bill will include statutory guidance for privacy-preserving age assurance. Given that, to date, many of the eye-catching changes brought about by the age-appropriate design code, such as safe search and dismantling direct messaging by unknown adults to children, have been rolled out globally, are the Government working with the new commissioner to encourage the UK’s allies and trading partners to adopt the code in other jurisdictions to better enforce its provisions? Does he agree that regulatory alignment between the online safety Bill and the code is essential if we are to keep children safe?

Asked by
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2022
Reference
818 c1813
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Kidron

109: After Clause 120, insert the following new Clause—

“Age-appropriate design code

(1) The Commissioner must prepare a code of practice which contains such guidance as the Commissioner considers appropriate on standards of age-appropriate design of relevant information society services which are likely to be accessed by children.

(2) Where a...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc212-3
House
House of Lords