Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:"Information Commissioner's Office"

Member X
Baroness Kidron
Subject X
Fees and charges

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Kidron, Baroness (13)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Fees and charges (13)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, as a veteran of the 2018 arguments on Article 80(2), I rise in support of Amendment 287, which would see its implementation.

Understanding and exercising personal data rights is not straightforward. Even when the rights are being infringed, it is rare that an individual data subject has the time,...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc319-321GC
House
House of Lords

Before we come to the end of this debate, I just want to raise something. I am grateful to the Minister for offering to bring forward the 2021 consultation on Article 80(2)—that will be interesting—but I wonder whether, as we look at the consultation and seek to understand the objections,...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c326GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak to Amendments 13 and 15. Before I do, let me say that I strongly support the comments of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, about HIV and the related vulnerability, and his assertion—almost—that Clause 5 is a solution in search of a problem. “Legitimate interest”...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 cc101-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, am I to take it from that that none of the changes currently in the Bill will expose children on a routine basis to direct marketing?

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 c107GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry if I am a little confused—I may well be—but the balancing test that is no longer going to be there allows a certain level of processing, which was the subject of the first amendment. The suggestion now is that children will be protected by a balancing test....

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 c107GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister mentioned a presumption that the ICO will update its guidance. Is there a timeframe for that? Will the guidance be updated before this comes into effect? How does the age of 14 relate to the AADC, which sets the age of adulthood at 18?

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 c116GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to press the Minister, but does the Bill state that guidance will be in place before this comes into effect?

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 c116GC
House
House of Lords

On the question of the ICO being responsible to Parliament, in the then Online Safety Bill and the digital markets Bill we consistently asked for regulators to be directly responsible to Parliament. If that is something the Government believe they are, we would like to see an expression of it.

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 c122GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the number of amendments proposed to Clause 14 reflects the Committee’s very real concern about the impact of automated decision-making on the privacy, safety and prospects of UK data subjects. I have specific amendments in groups 7 and 8, so I will speak to the impact of

Clause...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 cc143-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendments in this group highlight that Clause 14 lacks the necessary checks and balances to uphold equality legislation, individual rights and freedoms, data protection rights, access to services, fairness in the exercise of public functions and workers’ rights. I add my voice to that of the noble...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 cc152-3GC
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister give me an indication of the level at which that kicks in? For example, say there is a child in a classroom and a decision has been made about their ability in a particular subject. Is it automatic that the parent and the child get some sort...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 c155GC
House
House of Lords

We may come on to this when we get to edtech but a lot of those decisions are happening automatically right now, without any kind of review. I am curious as to why it is on the school whereas the person actually doing the processing may well be a technology...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 c155GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Kidron

109: After Clause 120, insert the following new Clause—

“Age-appropriate design code

(1) The Commissioner must prepare a code of practice which contains such guidance as the Commissioner considers appropriate on standards of age-appropriate design of relevant information society services which are likely to be accessed by children.

(2) Where a...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc212-3
House
House of Lords