Skip to main content

1-20 of 83 results for subject:Evidence

Member X
David Winnick

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Winnick, David (83)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

rose—

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2014
Reference
584 c710
House
House of Commons

That was, of course, on a majority vote, and I was reminded that in the last Parliament the Home Affairs Committee endorsed 42 days’ pre-charge detention, which obviously I voted against. My right hon. Friend the Member for Leicester East (Keith Vaz) was the Chair at the time and, if...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2014
Reference
584 c710
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend the Member for Blackburn (Mr Straw) said that the security services are far better than they were many years ago. That is because over many years and particularly in the ’70s and ’80s, there were campaigns both inside and outside the House for proper scrutiny of...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2014
Reference
584 cc744-5
House
House of Commons

Will the right hon. and learned Gentleman clarify whether that is the same Lord Carlile who argued endlessly in defence and justification of 90-days pre-charge detention?

7 pm

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2013
Reference
559 cc735-6
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend talked about a consensus in this House. I hope there will be the maximum amount of opposition to the proposals. Does he dismiss out of hand the number of people—distinguished lawyers who cannot be lumped together as hopeless liberals and so on—who believe that the proposals,...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2013
Reference
559 c739
House
House of Commons

I welcome the reduction of the period of detention from 28 to 14 days—although I wish it were without the reserve powers announced last week and again today—but is the Home Secretary aware that her statement on control orders will be very disappointing to many of us? It would be...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2011
Reference
522 c317
House
House of Commons

Is my right hon. Friend aware that for many of us, the core of the matter is simply Mr. Mohamed's claim that he was cruelly tortured abroad and that British security agents knew about and colluded in what occurred. If that is so—I note what the Foreign Secretary has said...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2009
Reference
487 c1001;487 c999
House
House of Commons

If 42 days is unfortunate and not necessary, what would have been the reaction of the minority community to which the hon. Gentleman referred if 90 days had been agreed to?

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c306-7
House
House of Commons

I hope that there will not be a vote on Lords amendment No. 3, but if there is, I will not vote with the Opposition. I may not vote with the Government either, just in case that is used in evidence against me at some later stage. I had to...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c304-5
House
House of Commons

Obviously the hon. Gentleman and I do not disagree on the issue of pre-charge detention, but my hon. Friend the Minister made it perfectly clear in response to an intervention that the measure we are discussing cannot be used to extend pre-charge detention beyond 28 days. If there were some...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c305
House
House of Commons

I hope that I have not been misunderstood, because it is not a matter of an emergency. I said I would do that if there was ““compelling evidence””. I am grateful for the kind remarks that my right hon. Friend made about me, but I hope that he will not...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c310
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for allowing me to intervene. I have had exchanges with other Ministers on this topic, but I think that this is my first one with him. In order that there should be no doubt about the issue, the Lords amendment says that"““nothing in...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c299
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Home Secretary for giving way; she has been very generous. Will she bear in mind the fact that when the Director of Public Prosecutions gave evidence to the Home Affairs Committee he made the point that if someone was held for 24 or 25 days...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
477 c323
House
House of Commons

And voted for the 90 days, of course.

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
477 c343
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for giving way. I certainly will not say anything unkind. I would not do so in any circumstances, especially after his kind words about me. My right hon. Friend sent out an e-mail to colleagues urging—together with a number of my hon....

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
477 c343
House
House of Commons

Should we not bear in mind that some of the Members who are so enthusiastic about the increase to 42 days were no less enthusiastic about voting for 90 days?

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
477 c352
House
House of Commons

I genuinely have a great deal of time for my hon. Friend, but is not the argument that she puts forward the reason why she voted for 90 days in 2005?

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
477 c366
House
House of Commons

It is all part of the debate.

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
477 c347
House
House of Commons

We have deliberated on the matter in the Select Committee on Home Affairs. Do I take it from what the hon. Gentleman said that he will not vote for an extension beyond 28 days?

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2008
Reference
472 c580
House
House of Commons

On prosecution, does my right hon. Friend agree that there will be much satisfaction that Parviz Khan was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment? The charge against him, to which he pleaded guilty, was intention to kidnap a Muslim British soldier and have him beheaded. Others were also prosecuted...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2008
Reference
472 c562
House
House of Commons