1-11 of 11 results for subject:Standards
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.163 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.009 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Standards
- We searched for
- subject_t:Standards OR subject_t:Benchmarking OR subject_t:"Performance indicators" OR subject_t:"Performance measurement" OR subject_t:"Performance standards" OR subject_t:"Performance targets" OR subject_ses:93107
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of the number...
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of the number...
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of the number of...
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of the number of...
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is her estimate of the number of letters...
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is her estimate of the number of letters...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of...
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of the number...
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of the number...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of the number of...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of the number of...
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of the number of letters received in...
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of the number of letters received in...
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of the number of letters received...
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales, what is the average time for a substantive reply to be sent to honourable Members' correspondence; what proportion takes more than (a) four weeks, (b) six weeks and (c) eight weeks; and what is his estimate of the number of letters received...
That this House notes that the best outcomes for mothers and babies, including low mortality statistics and high levels of maternal satisfaction, occur when there is separate and distinct midwifery legislation resulting in high quality midwifery care which contributes significantly to the improvement of public health and results in the best physical and pscho-social wellbeing for the mother, new baby and family, and that any future regulation of midwifery must recognise the uniqueness of the profession by the provision of a midwifery board within the statutory framework.
That this House notes that the best outcomes for mothers and babies, including low mortality statistics and high levels of maternal satisfaction, occur when there is separate and distinct midwifery legislation resulting in high quality midwifery care which contributes significantly to the improvement of public health and results in the...
That this House supports efforts to increase the use of recycled materials; accordingly supports the Recycled Content of Newsprint Bill, introduced by a cross-party group of honourable Members on 25th March which will require newspaper publishers to use 65 per cent. of recycled newsprint by 2003, 70 per cent. by 2006 and 80 per cent. by 2010; notes that the Bill would require newspaper and magazine publishers to ensure that 30 per cent. of the volume of the papers they place on the market are collected and recycled by 2003, 38 per cent. by 2006, 45 per cent. by 2010 and 50 per cent. thereafter; notes also that the Bill would require newspaper publishers ensure their newspapers state the percentage of recycled content of their newsprint as an average over the previous three months; and believes that this Bill will create thousands of new jobs and so have social and economic benefits, as well as environmental benefits.
That this House supports efforts to increase the use of recycled materials; accordingly supports the Recycled Content of Newsprint Bill, introduced by a cross-party group of honourable Members on 25th March which will require newspaper publishers to use 65 per cent. of recycled newsprint by 2003, 70 per cent. by...
That this House is concerned that increases in traffic will increase atmospheric pollution and emissions of greenhouse gases, hampering the achievement of the Government's 20 per cent. carbon dioxide reduction target and damaging communities and the countryside; notes the similar concerns expressed by the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution and the Transport Committee; notes, too, that the CBI has estimted that congestion costs industry ??19 billion per year; notes the words in the Government's election manifesto that 'a sustainable environment requires above all an effective and integrated transport policy at national, regional and local level;' and the acceptance in Consensus for Change 'that the current state of affairs is unsustainable'; believes, therefore, that traffic reduction is a vital part of a sustainable transport policy; accordingly welcomes the inclusion of Green Transport Plans in the recent guidance to local authorities and the passing of Road Traffic Reduction Acts in 1997 and 1998, but regrets that thus far targets are only required locally, believing that this anomaly, whereby traffic reduction targets are required for local roads, but not for national roads, cannot fully enable the establishment of 'an effective and integrated policy at national, regional and local level'; and therefore welcomes the proposals for traffic reduction promoted by a cross-party group of honourable Members which sets out a requirement for the Government to consult widely, and draw up and implement national policies to achieve, in a spirit of partnership, a reduction of traffic miles of 5 per cent. by 2005 and 10 per cent. by 2010.
That this House is concerned that increases in traffic will increase atmospheric pollution and emissions of greenhouse gases, hampering the achievement of the Government's 20 per cent. carbon dioxide reduction target and damaging communities and the countryside; notes the similar concerns expressed by the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution and...