Skip to main content

1-20 of 30 results for subject:Marriage

Member X
Baroness Warsi

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Warsi, Baroness (30)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, the honourable Member for the Medway area recently introduced the Marriage (Authorised Belief Organisations) Bill in the other place. It would mean that people who wished to be wedded at a humanist ceremony would not to have to attend a registry office afterwards to make the marriage legally binding. Will the Government support this Bill? Secondly, nearly a decade after the issue of unregistered Muslim marriages was first discussed by a Conservative-led Government, how do the Government reconcile their stated support for the rights and protection of women with their failure to act on this issue for over 10 years?

Asked by
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 November 2020
Reference
807 c1327
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sure my noble and learned friend accepts that the role of politicians and indeed government is to ensure that the law responds to the needs of a changing community. Therefore, could he explain why, despite 10 years of government policy consensus on religious marriages—that Muslim women in particular deserve the same protection as other married women—the Government still fail to put that protection in place?

Asked by
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2020
Reference
804 c557
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise to my noble friend for coming in as he was already on his feet at the start of the Statement. He may recall that an issue arose during Questions, and I was speaking to the House authorities about that.

I welcome the Statement, and I particularly welcome...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2018
Reference
789 c1777
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is my noble friend aware that Islamic religious marriages are recognised in the UK in law only if they are conducted overseas and not in the United Kingdom? This anomaly is the main reason why women turn to sharia councils when their marriages fail, an issue which my right honourable friend the Prime Minister was discussing earlier this week. If he is aware of that, and if the recognition of these marriages would stop references to sharia councils and indeed the practice of polygamy, why will the Government not adopt this provision? They have been aware that this is a solution as far back as 2011.

Asked by
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 January 2016
Reference
768 c903
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the practice of polygamy is a growing issue in the United Kingdom. Will my noble friend confirm that an Islamic marriage in the United Kingdom is not legally recognised and say what the Government intend to do to move towards legal recognition? That would provide essential protection specifically for women on the breakdown of that marriage and would also, as a by-product, deal with the issue of bigamy.

Asked by
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 June 2015
Reference
762 c291
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of reports about the proposed Emergency Provisions on Marriage Act for Burmese Buddhist women, which would take away from women their right to choose whom they marry. [HL6285]

Asked by
Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 April 2014
Reference
HL6285; 753 c188WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what representations they have made to the government of Pakistan concerning the difficulties faced by Hindus wishing to be legally married.[HL2960]

Asked by
Lord Hylton (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 November 2013
Reference
HL2960; 749 c18WA
House
House of Lords

1: Clause 1, leave out Clause 1

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1326
House
House of Lords

4: Schedule 1, page 134, line 16, at end insert— "( ) Without prejudice to the operation of sub-paragraph (2), the mental impairment consisting of or resulting from depression that has ceased to have a substantial adverse effect on a person’s ability to carry out normal day to day activities,...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1333
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 4 is designed to address how long-term or fluctuating conditions fit into the provisions of the Bill. As we stated in Committee, we welcome the fact that the Bill already contains some provisions to address fluctuating and recurring conditions. Paragraph 2(2) of Schedule 1 states: ""If an...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1333-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was interested to hear the comments from the Liberal Democrat Front Bench. The noble Lord, Lord Avebury, referred to the Equality and Human Rights Commission and outside bodies urging us to rethink and change our minds. I take on board those comments, but the noble Lord will...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1330
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not doubt the sincerity of the Minister in her commitment to this cause, but we on these Benches do not feel that this is the right way to deal with it. At this stage, I would like to test the opinion of the House. Division on...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1331
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that the Minister will excuse me. I am suffering from a migraine; hence I may sound slurred as well, unfortunately. I wish to make one point only in relation to this. I had a lengthy meeting with the Anti Caste Discrimination Alliance. It attended along with...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1348
House
House of Lords

My Lords, our views on this issue are well known and we went through them at length in Committee. I shall therefore not hold up Report stage unduly by espousing them all over again. We on these Benches support in principle the removal of the default retirement age. We have...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1389-90
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have listened to the impassioned speech of the noble Lord, Lord Wallace of Tankerness, with rapt interest and deep attention. It follows from the passionate speech of the noble Lord, Lord Lester, in Committee. We have heard very persuasive language. However, I have to apologise to the...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1404-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her detailed response. I also listened to the detailed response given to my amendment by the noble Lord, Lord Low. In those circumstances, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 4 withdrawn. Clause 8: Marriage and civil partnership Amendment 5 Clause 8:...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1339
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to move Amendment 1 and to speak to Amendments 2 and 3. It will come as little surprise that we on these Benches still feel very strongly that the public sector duty regarding socio-economic inequalities should be removed from the Equality Bill. As we made clear...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1326-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is a very interesting point at which to rise. I noted earlier the comments made by the noble Lord, Lord Davies of Coity, about his commitment to his religion over his commitment to his political party. As a Muslim I am quite concerned these days to talk...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2010
Reference
716 c1233-4
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord makes an important point and it is to clear up that confusion that I raised these questions with the Minister. If there is some confusion about what the European Commission says the Government have said, and what the Government say they have said, she should be able...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2010
Reference
716 c1234-5
House
House of Lords

We welcome these amendments from the Government and thank the Minister for her introduction to them. Effectively, these amendments are about auxiliary aids and services in schools. The combined effect would be to remove the existing exception in the Bill, whereby a local authority or school is not required to...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
716 c883
House
House of Lords