Skip to main content

1-20 of 30 results for subject:Elections

Member X
Lord Wallace of Tankerness
Subject X
Constituency size

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Wallace of Tankerness, Lord (30)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Constituency size (30)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Wales (Cheryl Gillan) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

I wish to inform the House that I am today publishing a Green Paper on future electoral arrangements for the National Assembly for Wales.

The Government’s programme of political renewal impacts on...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Department
Wales Office
Type
Written statements
Date
21 May 2012
Reference
737 c47WS
House
House of Lords

I think the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, helped to devise the system for mayoral elections that we have inherited. There are no proposals to change it. We are talking about elections to the other place. I have made it very clear that we see the merit of a system where...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c54
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, has moved an amendment which would change the referendum question to ask voters whether the supplementary vote system should be used instead of first past the post rather than the alternative vote system. It will come as no surprise, because it is the...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c52-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment moved by the noble Lord, Lord Howarth of Newport, would provide that, under the alternative vote system, voters would be required to express a preference for every candidate standing at the election. As he indicated in moving his amendment, we had some debate on a related...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c114-5
House
House of Lords

The simple answer is that I do not know and I would not want to confirm something that I do not know.

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c116
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, says from a sedentary position that it is right. Be that as it may, the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, prefaced his remarks by saying that he did not support the compulsory system and preferred the optional preferential system. If we believe that that is a...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c116
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord invited me to look to the best interests of the Liberal Democrats. I would not tread anywhere on looking at what might be considered the best interests of the Conservative Party. If the referendum was on the question proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, and if...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c47-8
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, has, as the noble Lord, Lord Neill of Bladen, has indicated, proposed an amendment which would take out the option of the alternative vote in a referendum and ask whether the system should be changed and a different system of electing MPs be introduced at...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c47
House
House of Lords

When we debate Amendment 5F, I will be able to give a clear answer to that. I do not wish to hazard a guess at this stage. I think that there has been a statement from the chief counting officer, who is the chair of the Electoral Commission, that the...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c39-40
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had another interesting debate on, as the noble Lord, Lord Lipsey, indicated, the difference between the amendments we are discussing here and those which were debated earlier. I only wish that the strength of the argument deployed by the noble Lord against thresholds had been sufficient...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c108-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these amendments, as the noble Lord, Lord Lipsey, has indicated, seek to undermine, even remove, the link between the commencement arrangements for the AV and for the constituencies part of the Bill. Anyone who has ever been a political realist would recognise that in terms of a coalition...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c110-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the vote took place only a few hours ago and the Government are still to consider how they will respond to it. In answer to the noble and learned Lord’s question, this is neither a consequential amendment, as the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, and I have indicated, nor...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c102
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while I note that the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, has moved the amendment formally, we discussed it in context earlier and it is important to recognise that it goes much further—

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c100
House
House of Lords

The amendment is re-moved but not removed—yet. I fully accept the spirit in which the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, re-moved it. As he recognises, this is not entirely consequential. We could get a turnout of 80 per cent and yet, with this change, we would still create a power rather...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c101
House
House of Lords

I can only confirm the factual position. I fully take the point that the noble and learned Lord has not yet had an opportunity to consider the letter. I have no idea when it was put into the system. I saw a draft earlier but was not in a position...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c95-6
House
House of Lords

What I said was that, as I understand it, under Section 127, any broadcast whose purpose or main purpose—there is obviously a difference; a purpose is not necessarily a main purpose—promotes a particular outcome, it would fall foul of Section 127. The point I was trying to develop is that...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c97
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for the way in which he presents a very tricky and complex issue. I think I indicated that one of the difficulties was the possibility of limiting the ability of a party to show how its position on the referendum formed part of...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c98
House
House of Lords

My noble friend makes a fair point. The last thing any political party wants is to find that, after having spent money, the broadcast has to be pulled. I shall discuss in a moment approaches that have been made to the political parties by the chair of the Broadcasters’ Liaison...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c98-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these are important amendments. I immediately take the point made by the noble and learned Lord on the follow-up to Committee. I regret any discourtesy that has been felt by the noble and learned Lord. While he was making his comments, I had the draft of a letter...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c95
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, for moving the amendment, as he said, on behalf of the coalition. He described the reasons for it. The Bill as it stood was defective, because, while the noble Lord specified that the referendum had to take place before 31 October,...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2011
Reference
725 c37-8
House
House of Lords