Skip to main content

1-20 of 20 results for subject:Liability

Member X
Lord Wallace of Tankerness
Session X
2010-12

Type

House

Session

2010-12 (20)

Year

Department

Member

More
Wallace of Tankerness, Lord (20)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I thank my noble friend for his amendments. It will come as no surprise to the House if I yet again echo what has been said on numerous occasions on Report: the architecture, as my noble friend Lord McNally referred to it, of this part of the Bill...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2012
Reference
736 c349-52
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have, as the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, indicated, moved on to Part 2, but I open by saying that on my walk from Dover House to the House this afternoon, I, too, fell. I went over on my ankle on what I think was a crack in...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2012
Reference
736 c302-5
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to my noble friend. Debate on his amendment might allow a better exploration of the important point raised by the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham.

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2012
Reference
736 c305
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this may not be quite what the noble Lord was thinking about, but in some cases, as my noble friend Lord Faulks indicated, if there is a question of a claim following a bereavement, we have indicated that we intend that there should be an uplift in these...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2012
Reference
736 c305
House
House of Lords

As I said in response to my noble friend Lord Thomas, we do not believe that that is necessary because it is the Government’s intention that such matters would be included in the definition of non-monetary benefit awarded to the claimant in any event should the additional penalty be calculated...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2012
Reference
734 c1355
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may deal with Amendments 121, 122, 129, 130, 134, 136A, 136B, 151, 152, 156AA, 156AB and 156C together. All seek to exempt certain types of cases from the Government’s reforms of no-win no-fee conditional fee agreements—CFAs. My noble friend Lord Newton described some of these amendments...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2012
Reference
734 c1360-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, and my noble friend Lord Phillips, in thanking my noble friend Lord Thomas of Gresford for introducing this compendious set of amendments. It is useful to do that because it brings together all the different strands of this package. As the...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2012
Reference
734 c1344-6
House
House of Lords

My plane from Edinburgh, too, was delayed today; I understand the noble Lord's difficulties. He mentioned the arrangement for making offers. Part 36 arrangements were spoken to by my noble friend Lord Thomas when he moved the amendment. I will come to the matter in responding to the debate. As...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2012
Reference
734 c1346
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is very evident from the three interventions that this matter is clearly exercising the Committee. I certainly note from the experience of the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Butler-Sloss, having chaired a rules committee that perhaps we are going into territory which we may not have been...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2012
Reference
734 c1351-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we believe that the package of proposals seek to end ATE insurance premiums being charged to the defendant with the specific exception of clinical negligence cases. To start unpicking it in such an important respect would not retain integrity of the proposals as a whole. I hope that...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2012
Reference
734 c1352-4
House
House of Lords

I think I understand what the noble Lord is saying and I think I gave an indication on that point. Let me just try to find that—

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2012
Reference
734 c1355
House
House of Lords

We will come to increased damages. Damages are totally to one side in this. The point I was making was about the difference between claimants’ costs and defendants’ costs. For example, in clinical negligence cases in the period 2005 to 2010, claimants’ costs paid increased by 45 per cent while...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2012
Reference
734 c1347-50
House
House of Lords

I thought that I was going to be diverted down the tracks of coroners’ inquests. However, I take the point which my noble friend makes. We believe that the relevant provision already covers the matter. He draws a comparison between measures within the same clause. We will have an opportunity...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2012
Reference
734 c389-90
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we certainly believe that going down this road will mean that poor people do not have to pay up-front for their necessary expert reports. Indeed, that is why we draw a distinction between our reforms as they affect clinical negligence and the reforms that affect claims for damages...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2012
Reference
734 c387-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it would not be appropriate to second guess, as it were, what the director of legal aid casework might decide on any individual case. Suffice to say that the purpose of having Clause 9 in the Bill is to take account of cases where the client would find...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2012
Reference
734 c389
House
House of Lords

We do not wish to inflict the scenario which my noble friend indicates. The scale at which we believe the exceptional funding will be used is indicative of our expectation that exceptional funding will be available to assist these very profound cases. No one is disputing the seriousness of this....

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2012
Reference
734 c389
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think the position is that if they lose they do not pay it. That is what we are retaining in cases of clinical negligence. In short, poor people will not have to pay up-front for the necessary expert reports in clinical negligence cases.

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2012
Reference
734 c387
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the point that we are making is that while the ATE insurance premium is being abolished generally, in the event of a CFA being agreed in a case of clinical negligence, the Government are retaining the recoverability of ATE insurance premiums. These are very rarely paid up-front. I...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2012
Reference
734 c387
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, in congratulating those who have taken part in what has been a very serious debate. The Committee has benefitted from experience: the experience of those who have practised law in this sphere; the personal experience of my noble friend Lady Eaton...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2012
Reference
734 c384-6
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether in criminal prosecutions they will allow the Crown Prosecution Service to be subject to civil actions for damages if (a) their conduct resulted in a preventable miscarriage of justice, or (b) the Crown Prosecution Service failed to follow their code of conduct for Crown...

Asked by
Lord Laird (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2010
Reference
4859; 723 c112WA
House
House of Lords