Skip to main content

1-20 of 52 results for subject:Evidence

Member X
Lord Tunnicliffe

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Tunnicliffe, Lord (52)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Not being familiar with police procedures, to me the essence of the argument seems to be about when the defence is deployed. Can the noble Lord explain what that means in practical terms?

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c151GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Opposition are generally in favour of this Bill, but I find the arguments of the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, somewhat persuasive. I particularly like the way the noble and learned Lord, Lord Judge, put things in the general perspective of law. Even little deviations from sound general...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c153GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if I can give some comfort to the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, I did not understand it either.

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c182GC
House
House of Lords

Given the lack of clarity, if a letter could be sent to us before any discussion takes place, that would be good.

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c187GC
House
House of Lords

May I join the noble Baroness and say that I too am confused?

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c188GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may speak briefly on this rather macabre amendment. First, I am not sure who the testing is to be done on. I cannot see many volunteers being willing to be corroded. My second and more substantive point is that I cannot see why the definition is...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c201GC
House
House of Lords

The amendment is supported by these Benches.

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 November 2012
Reference
740 c1851
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 66 seeks to establish an independent commissioner for terrorist suspects. As my noble friend Lord Brett indicated in Committee, we are concerned that the establishment of such a commissioner would have a detrimental effect on the efficient and effective conduct of terrorist investigations. Such investigations are fast-moving...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c867-9
House
House of Lords

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 66 to which the Commons have disagreed and do agree with the Commons in their Amendment 66A in lieu thereof. That this House do not insist on its Amendment 66 to which the Commons have disagreed and do agree with the...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c866-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may first address the concerns of the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, who explained rather better than I can from my notes the basis of his first point. Proposed new subsection (3A) is meant to relate to the narrow point of operational police matters. Because the ICVs...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c871-2
House
House of Lords

These amendments relate to powers to impose driving disqualifications and extend the principle that we have already established in Schedule 15 that time spent in prison should not erode the impact of disqualification. The provisions already contained in the Bill deal with those offenders when the court imposes both a...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
713 c1257
House
House of Lords

90A: Schedule 15, page 157, line 23, at end insert— "Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 1980 (S.I. 1980/704 (N.I. 6)) A1 After Article 8 of the Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 1980 insert— "8A Extension of disqualification where custodial sentence also imposed (1) This Article applies where a person is...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
713 c1255-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we return to the issue of indeterminate sentences for public protection, which the amendment seeks to abolish. The Government introduced these public protection sentences in the Criminal Justice Act 2003. They apply to offences committed on or after 5 April 2005 and are designed to deal with dangerous...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
713 c1253-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments 76P and 76Q pick up an issue previously discussed in Committee. I have to tell the noble Lord, Lord Thomas, that the amendments would have no material effect when compared with the current drafting. Under Clause 78(6), the court will necessarily have to consider any fear of...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
713 c1201
House
House of Lords

78: Clause 103, page 61, line 13, leave out "Enterprise and Regulatory Reform" and insert "Innovation and Skills"

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
713 c1203
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Henley, will recall that these technical amendments mirror ones we tabled in Committee, but which I withdrew at the conclusion of the debate on 13 July. As I previously explained, Clause 103 extends to the Financial Services Authority and the Secretary of State for...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
713 c1203-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, once again I am sorry that the drafting may not be elegant, but I believe it is clear. The clause effectively defines "acting personally", and subsection (4) makes it quite clear what the phrase means in this clause. I am sure that noble Lords will agree that such...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
713 c1205
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these amendments provide for the replacement of the current provision on voting rights for convicted prisoners with a system by which a prisoner’s right to vote is determined by the court that sentenced them. As the noble Lord has reminded the House, the European Court of Human Rights...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
713 c1215-7
House
House of Lords

I do not feel that that would add to the issue of the debate. That is about the past and I have set out what we are doing now. I hope that will have the support of the House and that the noble Lord will withdraw his amendment.

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
713 c1217
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is the view of Her Majesty’s Government that once an anomaly, which may have some substance, in the law comes to their attention, it should be addressed at the earliest opportunity. This is the earliest opportunity since the anomaly was seen to make this very limited correction...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
713 c1172
House
House of Lords