Skip to main content

1-20 of 20 results for subject:"Maintained schools"

Member X
Lord Touhig

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Touhig, Lord (20)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I have to admit that this is not the Queen’s Speech I had hoped to be debating today but the electorate have made their decision and we are where we are.

For me, raising academic standards is clearly of the utmost importance in any education policy. However, the Government...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2015
Reference
762 cc494-6
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will ensure that local authorities will receive the equivalent amount, compared to academies in their area, of local authority central spend equivalent grant per pupil for schools which they continue to maintain.

Asked by
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 November 2011
Reference
13372; 733 c30WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, by introducing these new clauses into the Bill the Government will allow local councils to test the use of direct payments for meeting special educational needs. I certainly welcome and support the greater personalisation of educational provision for young people as does the noble Lord, Lord Low, and...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2011
Reference
731 c1197-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have some concerns about these amendments, in particular Amendment 86 in the name of my noble friend Lady Turner of Camden and Amendment 88 in the name of my noble friend Lady Massey of Darwen. Amendment 86 would dilute the existing legislative protection which allows Catholic schools...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2011
Reference
731 c1176-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not detain the House for long. I was going to say a few words about the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, but the noble Lord, Lord Alton, has covered the points that I would have made. In an exchange with the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2011
Reference
731 c769
House
House of Lords

Subsection (2)(a) of the new clause proposed by Amendment 69 broadens the range of persons who can object to a school’s admission arrangements. That seems to leave the door open to people who have no direct interest in a school’s admissions policy to be able to object. What will the...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2011
Reference
731 c759
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we seem to be repeating the arguments we had in Committee. The noble Lord, Lord Avebury, has taken the argument a little further. His description of forcing worship down throats was exaggerated and perhaps, on reflection, the noble Lord might think it was not worthy of him. Currently,...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2011
Reference
731 c597-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise at the request of my noble friend Lady Howe to speak to the amendments that she has tabled. As the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley, explained, she cannot be here today. I am delighted to be able to follow the noble Baroness. It is more than 20...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2011
Reference
729 c456-8GC
House
House of Lords

In my part of the world we found that the primary school council was a very good conduit into the school governing body.

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2011
Reference
729 c462GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we had a good debate on this issue on the second day of Committee. I do not intend to detain the Committee very long, other than to say that the Minister has been extremely helpful and thoughtful. We had a good discussion. One point came out in that...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2011
Reference
729 c392-3GC
House
House of Lords

Parents have a right to decide on their children’s education and, if they choose for their children to take part in a collective act of worship, which the law of this country so prescribes, they are entitled to exercise that right. I do not think we are entitled as legislators...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2011
Reference
729 c377-8GC
House
House of Lords

Yes, indeed, and a number of Members did not come into the Chamber. It is right and proper that they should be able to exercise that right. Equally, parents on behalf of their children can exercise the same right under the law as it stands. My noble friend said earlier...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2011
Reference
729 c378GC
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to my noble friend for clarifying that point, because it is important that we fully understand her views on this. I am glad that I gave her the opportunity to explain in more detail what she believes and understands. I accept her final point. I have...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2011
Reference
729 c414-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I looked at Amendments 138 and 140 and was troubled and confused. After listening to my noble friend Lady Massey, I am worried again. She knows me well enough to know that I have no wish to misrepresent her in any way, but she seems to be saying...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2011
Reference
729 c413-4GC
House
House of Lords

May I just respond to the Minister? The Government are quite wrong. This is the second occasion on which they have sought to curtail debate, but that is not their role. Members are entitled to take part in the debate as widely as they need to or want to. The...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2011
Reference
729 c385GC
House
House of Lords

I support the objectives in the noble Lord’s amendment. However, in voluntary aided Catholic schools and academies, the governing body is the admissions authority. Currently it can determine admissions on oversubscription criteria based on a child being a Catholic or a non-Catholic and so on. These schools are required to,...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2011
Reference
729 c401GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a Christian. I am concerned about these amendments. Currently there is a legal requirement on all schools to have a daily act of collective worship of a broadly Christian nature. As has been said by a number of noble Lords, parents have the...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2011
Reference
729 c376-7GC
House
House of Lords

That is not the case. It is a question of parental decision. If we accept the European Convention on Human Rights, parents have a primary right to educate their children. That is what it says.

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2011
Reference
729 c377GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, children with a special educational need often fail to receive the support they require in school. Sometimes it is because their disability is not identified and at other times the school is simply not aware of how best to support children with special educational needs. Currently there are...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
728 c700-2
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what his policy is with regard to the establishment of combined cadet forces in state maintained schools.

Asked by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
443 c9W;443 c9W; 54224
House
House of Commons