Skip to main content

1-20 of 41 results for subject:"Freedom of information"

Member X
Lord Touhig

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Touhig, Lord (41)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House believes that the home address of any hon. or Rt. hon. Member should not be published if he or she objects to publication on grounds of privacy or personal security.

Primary sponsor
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
1620; 1620A1
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on proposals for public authorities to be able to refuse freedom of information requests on costs grounds.

Lead member
Lord Touhig
Answering member
Vera Baird
Department
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c295-319WH
House
House of Commons

I sought the debate so that hon. and right hon. Members, who, like me, have serious misgivings about the plans of the Department for Constitutional Affairs to amend the Freedom of Information Act 2000 regulations, could explore the arguments with the Minister before the consultation ends on 8 March. The...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c295WH
House
House of Commons

Yes, spinning. In the response to the Constitutional Affairs Committee’s report, the Government said that they welcomed and shared the Committee’s assessment, adding:"““While the government is pleased by the significant success that FOI represents it will continue to build on that success.””" To me, that it is a commitment. The...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c296WH
House
House of Commons

I understand my hon. Friend’s point. Like many colleagues in the Chamber today from all parties, throughout my political life as a councillor and as a Minister, the one thing I was a told was, ““If you do that, it would be setting a precedent.”” If we had not set...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c295-6WH
House
House of Commons

I was about to come to that point in response to my hon. Friend. If the aggregation provisions are included, they could be used against a newspaper, which could then find that the requests made by all its journalists to a particular authority during a 60-day period were refused once...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c298-9WH
House
House of Commons

I believe that there has been progress and there are opportunities to make further progress along that particular avenue, through greater efficiencies, using IT systems and so on. These regulations are not needed as far as that process is concerned. What is the driving force behind these so-called reforms? The...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c300-1WH
House
House of Commons

I rarely regret accepting an intervention, but that is the rest of my speech just delivered for me. I take on board the hon. Gentleman’s point, and I shall refer to it as I develop my argument. The more people the authority decides to invite to a meeting to discuss...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c297-8WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a very important point. It is very difficult for us as parliamentarians to find ourselves frustrated when Parliament has clearly expressed its will on the matter.

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c298WH
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many requests for Internal Reviews of Requests for Information he has received in each of the last three years; and how many were completed within 40 working days of receipt of the application.

Asked by
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2006
Reference
64781; 445 c848W;445 c848W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what his Department's policy is on the time taken to respond to requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Asked by
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2006
Reference
47739; 442 c822W;442 c822W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much has been received by his Department in fees for the provision of information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in its first year of operation.

Asked by
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2006
Reference
47738; 442 c822W;442 c822W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what his Department's policy is on charging for information requested under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Asked by
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2006
Reference
47737; 442 c822W;442 c822W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many requests under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 his Department received in the first year of its operation.

Asked by
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2006
Reference
47736; 442 c822W;442 c822W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 were refused by his Department in its first year of the Act's operation.

Asked by
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2006
Reference
47740; 442 c823W;442 c823W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 were met within 20 working days by his Department in the first year of the Act's operation.

Asked by
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2006
Reference
47741; 442 c823W;442 c823W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to his Department which have been passed to the FOI clearing house for evaluation, broken down by (a) subject and (b) date of request.

Asked by
Peter Law (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 January 2006
Reference
441 c219W; 28944
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many freedom of information applications his Department has received; how many have taken more than 20 days to process; and how many of these gave rise to complaints about the time taken.

Asked by
Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 November 2005
Reference
439 c2203W;439 c2201W; 31209
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many requests he has received to disclose information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000; and what the average time taken to make a decision on the disclosures has been.

Asked by
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 November 2005
Reference
439 c1562W;439 c1564W; 28351
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on UK participation in the Aarhus Convention as it applies to freedom of information obligations in environmental affairs of a defence nature, with particular reference to (a) depleted uranium and (b) nuclear material.

Asked by
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2005
Reference
16058; 437 c4W;437 c4W
House
House of Commons