Skip to main content

1-20 of 24 results for subject:"Data processing"

Member X
Stephen Timms

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Timms, Stephen (24)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My reading of the proposed new schedule is that it gives the Department the power to look into the bank accounts of people claiming the state pension. Am I right about that?

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2023
Reference
741 c879
House
House of Commons

Can the Minister give us an example of the circumstances in which the Department would need to look into the bank accounts of people claiming state pensions in order to tackle the fraud problem? Why is the state pension within the scope of this amendment?

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2023
Reference
741 c880
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak specifically to Government new clause 34 and connected Government amendments which, as we have been reminded, give Ministers power to inspect the bank accounts of anyone claiming a social security benefit. I think it has been confirmed that that includes child benefit and the state pension,...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2023
Reference
741 cc898-900
House
House of Commons

Yes, there is a clear and long-established right in law for the DWP to look into people’s bank accounts if there is a suspicion of fraud. This power is giving the Department the ability to look into the bank accounts of people where there is no suspicion at all. All...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2023
Reference
741 c900
House
House of Commons

My understanding was that the level of fraud among state pension claims was indeed extremely small. The Minister said earlier that the Government should take powers only where they are absolutely necessary; I think he is now saying that they are not necessary in the case of people claiming a...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2023
Reference
741 c912
House
House of Commons

I add my very warm welcome back to you, Dame Eleanor; like everyone, I am delighted to see you back in the Chair.

I will make a few brief remarks. Initially, I will follow up the speech from the hon. Member for Amber Valley (Nigel Mills) in favour of amendment 3,...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2023
Reference
729 cc88-90
House
House of Commons

Like my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner), who gave an excellent speech a few minutes ago, I will focus my remarks on the data protection aspects of the Bill. The Minister will have seen the press report this morning on research carried out by the Federation of...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 cc102-3
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Secretary of State, and I welcome that commitment on the part of the Prime Minister.

The problem is, however, that the International Trade Secretary and the Foreign Secretary have been saying different. That led to techUK, the industry body, writing to the International Trade Secretary last...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c103
House
House of Commons

I am glad that the Secretary of State has been lobbied in support of his own position, but he needs to watch his back against Ministers who lack the clarity that he has expressed—particularly the International Trade Secretary and the Foreign Secretary, who continue to say that there is merit...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 cc103-4
House
House of Commons

May I take it from what my right hon. Friend says that the official Opposition’s position is that we will support the retention of the amendments agreed in the other place?

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c130
House
House of Commons

As the Secretary of State is describing, the Bill puts into UK law the EU’s general data protection regulation, which is the right thing to do. I am confident that he would agree that we need to ensure that our data protection rules stay in line with the EU regulation...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c77
House
House of Commons

I very much agree with the points that the Minister is making and the ambition he is setting out. Will he commit to securing an adequacy agreement from the EU so that the free flow of personal data, which he rightly says is important, can continue?

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c498
House
House of Commons

I am glad that the Minister is committed to seeking this adequacy agreement. Does he recognise that one step that will make that a bit harder—perhaps significantly harder—is the fact that under the terms of the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill, article 8 of the European charter of fundamental rights will...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c502
House
House of Commons

Of course Norway is not a member of the European Union, but is a member of the single market.

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c514
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to follow the hon. Member for Stirling (Stephen Kerr) and will pick up on one or two of his points.

David Cameron has a great deal to answer for. To win support from his party’s right wing for his leadership bid in 2005, he promised during the leadership...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 cc519-520
House
House of Commons

No, certainly not. I am delighted that my Labour colleagues in the European Parliament have retained their place in the Socialist group and therefore their influence. The problem for Britain has been that, by leaving the EPP, Conservative MEPs have had much less influence. I am not saying that they...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 cc520-1
House
House of Commons

The proposal is that article 8 will not be there any more. The problem is this: where in the European acquis, which is being brought into UK law, is the clear statement that everyone has the right to have their personal data protected? It is not there, and if it...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c521
House
House of Commons

The problem is that it is not. There is no clear assertion anywhere in UK law—other than, at present, in article 8—that everyone has the right to have their personal data protected. As I have said, and as was said in the Select Committee yesterday, judges, when making judgments on...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c521
House
House of Commons

As chair of the all-party parliamentary group on data analytics, my hon. Friend is in a very good position to understand just how important this is for our economy. He is absolutely right: if we open up that uncertainty in our regulatory arrangements, it will be harder, perhaps impossible, to...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c522
House
House of Commons

The firms in my hon. Friend’s constituency are absolutely right. If we do not achieve that adequacy declaration, it will become illegal for personal data to be exchanged between the UK and the countries of the EU, and there will no longer be a lawful basis for large swathes of...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c522
House
House of Commons