Skip to main content

1-20 of 63 results for subject:Disqualification

Member X
Gerry Sutcliffe

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Sutcliffe, Gerry (63)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

We believe that that opportunity exists in terms of the recommendations that can be made with regard to the public sector, especially for prisons by the independent inspector of prisons. Listening to hon. Members this evening, one would think that lessons are never learned or that the Government and the...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c103
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend makes the point that people should expect the same protection, but we are talking about different environments, and that is the difference. The hon. Member for Beaconsfield talked about what he would expect a future Conservative Government—God forbid—to do, but this is the first Government to...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c103
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is saying that the consequence of his argument is that the principle would apply to the armed forces, despite his distinction that members of the armed forces are volunteers and prisoners are not.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c104
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is entitled to his opinion but he is entirely wrong. In terms of the Bill, the Government are acting in three ways—as an employer, an occupier and a provider of goods and services. If the hon. Gentleman’s logic was followed through, the same principle would apply to...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c104
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend cannot have it both ways. He asked us to consider things, so we considered them and came to our conclusions. He does not support our conclusion, but that does not mean that we did not consider the matter, just as we have considered suggestions throughout the Bill’s...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c104
House
House of Commons

I am taking the unusual step of making my contribution now because I may not have an opportunity later, and my hon. Friend the Member for Hendon (Mr. Dismore) and the hon. Member for Beaconsfield (Mr. Grieve) have asked me to explain the Government’s position. I am pleased that we...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c101-2
House
House of Commons

I do not mean to be insulting in any way, but I would have hoped that my right hon. Friend would know the difference between the situation in the health service and the custodial position, in terms of the difficulties and complexities of custody. The custodial environment deals with difficult...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c103
House
House of Commons

I am happy to examine all the options. Indeed, it was suggested today that I look at public procurement by companies that have been convicted, and consider whether or not we can take action. I have to qualify everything that I say, as we must examine these things within the...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c75-6
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend tempts me with a multiple choice question. The Bill and the cultural changes that, hopefully, it will bring about, either by acting as a deterrent or offering a legal remedy, will make directors at all levels, particularly senior directors, understand their responsibilities and the nature of what...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c76
House
House of Commons

I shall give way to my hon. Friend, but then I wish to make progress.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c76
House
House of Commons

I accept what my right hon. Friend is saying, and hope to touch on that point. The thinking is being developed. I had an opportunity in my previous role in the Department of Trade and Industry to examine the Company Law Reform Bill, as was. We could have put a...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c72-3
House
House of Commons

As I understand it, the court would make the order, and it would identify a responsible individual who is to respond to the courts. I was asked to look at those issues in greater detail, and I am prepared to do so. We are working on those details. Unfortunately, through...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c75
House
House of Commons

I accept that point. [Interruption.] No, certainly not. I reverted to my former career in the Whips Office to understand why we are where we are. We certainly had ample time and opportunity in Committee to discuss the issues. I am trying to explain our motivation, as there is genuine...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c75
House
House of Commons

I am trying to argue that there would be the opportunity to combine corporate manslaughter with existing health and safety legislation. My hon. Friend will know that it took a great deal of care and consideration to get the Bill into its present shape. I know that he and my...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c74
House
House of Commons

I am aware of my hon. Friend’s point, which he raised in Committee, too. He knows why we do not think that such a measure would be appropriate at this time. In an earlier contribution, he asked me to outline where we were on corporate probation and reparatory orders, and...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c74-5
House
House of Commons

Thinking always continues, and I hope that further progress will be made. I shall refer to that as I move on in my speech.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c72
House
House of Commons

I assure my hon. Friend that discussions have taken place with the Scottish Executive. Indeed, I met the Scottish Minister for Justice to discuss the Bill last week. Discussions are taking place about the likely impact in Scotland, given its different legislation.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c72
House
House of Commons

I will, I hope, assist my hon. Friend towards the end of my contribution by rounding off my view on each of the new clauses and amendments by stating what we will try to do. The aim of the group of amendments is to redefine the circumstances in which individuals...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c71-2
House
House of Commons

Not at this point, but as the hon. Gentleman knows, the Government are working to put victims at the heart of the criminal justice system. We will look at the impact of the Bill on the families of victims, so it is a good point that the hon. Gentleman raises....

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c117
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read the Third time. In concluding our debate on Second Reading, I spoke about how proud I was that the Bill had been introduced and, as we prepare to end our proceedings and send it to another place, I make no...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c115-7
House
House of Commons