Skip to main content

1-20 of 166 results for subject:Accountability

Member X
Gerry Sutcliffe

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Sutcliffe, Gerry (166)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for the work he has been doing on this case, which has affected the credibility of some of the free schools in Bradford—notwithstanding the fact that there are some good ones. We had to get the information about when the police were informed...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2014
Reference
574 c251WH
House
House of Commons
I thank the Home Secretary for banning the English Defence League march in Bradford. She listened to the calls of local residents and the police and was right to support the banning order. However, that was for a march, and a static demonstration happened. Can we look at the legislation again to see whether we can stop even the static demonstrations, which cost taxpayers a huge amount of money?
Asked by
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
6 September 2010
Reference
515 c5-6
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport when he expects to receive the report of the inquiry into the World Class Payments Bureau at Sport England; and whether the full report will be published.

Asked by
Hugh Robertson (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 2009
Reference
495 c653W; 284235
House
House of Commons

I will give way to the hon. Gentleman, but then I need to make progress.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c667
House
House of Commons

I hope that that is not the case. We are trying to meet the requirements placed on us in the discussions and debates in both Houses, and we are trying to accommodate the concerns that have been raised, recognising that the Government’s first viewpoint was that provisions on deaths in...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c667-8
House
House of Commons

That certainly is not the case. The debate on the Bill has been conducted in a generous spirit and I hope hon. Members will appreciate that we have tried to meet the concerns that have been expressed. That is reflected in the number of amendments that the Government have accepted...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c668
House
House of Commons

I am sure that the chair of the forum will be robust, as he already has been in talking to me, about what he would regard as the details of how we should reform measures. We want to make the review work and I would hope that the forum will...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c691
House
House of Commons

We have to remember that in the Bill the duty of care has to be seen in the context of a gross breach of procedure. Hon. Members have understandably focused on deaths in custody, but we must see the Bill in its wider context, and putting that measure in the...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c690-1
House
House of Commons

I thank all hon. Members for the quality of the debate and for their welcome for the way in which the Government have listened to what has been said in the various debates in both Houses. I am grateful to my hon. Friend the Member for Hendon (Mr. Dismore) and...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c690
House
House of Commons

Has the hon. Gentleman seen the letters from the British Transport police and several chief constables who have concerns about this issue from the perspective of risk aversion? This case is not being made by the Government; it is substantiated by people working on the front line.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c679
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has put his finger on the Government’s reason for not wanting the Bill to be used in the way that has been suggested. The existing measures relating to deaths in custody are important to us, as are the existing measures to develop and strengthen the forum for...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c677-8
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c662
House
House of Commons

I am proud to say that we are nearly there with the Bill and with getting a new offence of corporate manslaughter on to the statute book. I hope that for all those people who have campaigned for so long for this new offence—to whom I pay tribute today—we can...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c662
House
House of Commons

I will come on to the issues around the Human Rights Act. Clearly, we believe that by lifting Crown immunity in the way that we have, we have taken a considerable step forward in health and safety legislation. I will return to the point that the hon. and learned Gentleman...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c663
House
House of Commons

We are concerned about public policy issues relating to the distribution of resources to particular services. The hon. Members for Beaconsfield (Mr. Grieve) and for Kingston and Surbiton (Mr. Davey) should allow me to continue my speech, because I hope to allay some of their fears by pointing out the...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c665
House
House of Commons

Again, we will want to examine the detail of the role and responsibilities when we consider the next appropriate legislative vehicle, in line with the Joint Committee’s recommendations. I do not think that that will be the outcome, but I do not want to pre-empt the discussions that will have...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c666
House
House of Commons

The hon. and learned Gentleman will have read the Hansard report in which I said that I hope that the legislation is never used. We do not want prosecutions; we want the corporate bodies to make sure that their policies are strong enough to prevent any of the offences from...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c667
House
House of Commons

I hope to do that. I am grateful for that intervention and the hon. Gentleman’s involvement throughout the Bill’s passage. I am trying to express the fact that we think that the role of the prisons and probation ombudsman will need time to develop in the way in which we...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c666-7
House
House of Commons

My response to my hon. Friend, and to the other hon. Members who have asked, ““Why are you waiting?”” is that it is important that people recognise how far the Government have moved on the issue, and I am sure that they will. Previously, we did not want to deal...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c667
House
House of Commons

The hon. and learned Gentleman is trying to take me down an avenue that I do not wish to go down this afternoon. He will know that several discussions are taking place about relationships with the judiciary. I am sure that we will return to that issue in due course.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c663
House
House of Commons