Skip to main content

1-20 of 282 results for subject:Ministers

Member X
Jack Straw

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Straw, Jack (282)

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

One of the clear duties on any Secretary of State, for which they in turn are responsible to the Prime Minister and not to Lord Leveson, concerns the conduct of their special advisers. Given what the Prime Minister knows already about the palpable dereliction of duty by the Secretary of...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2012
Reference
543 c1246-7
House
House of Commons

When the Prime Minister read of the extensive investigation in The New York Times on 1 September last year, what was his reaction, and what did he do?

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2011
Reference
531 c926
House
House of Commons

May I commend the Prime Minister on the appointment of Lord Justice Leveson, who, as I am sure the Justice Secretary will confirm, is a man of the highest intelligence and integrity, and extremely well equipped to take on the job? On the future regulation of the press, I urge...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2011
Reference
531 c317-8
House
House of Commons

Like my hon. Friend the Member for Rhondda (Chris Bryant), I am a supporter of the alternative vote system, as I have made clear, not least in a tract that few people read, to which I contributed with my right hon. Friend the Member for Neath (Mr Hain) in 1986....

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 February 2011
Reference
523 c906
House
House of Commons

This whole argument is against a motion that was not passed in the other place. It is against one that was defeated where there was a threshold that amounted to a veto on the result if the turnout were below that threshold. Does the Minister not accept that this Lords...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 February 2011
Reference
523 c899-900
House
House of Commons

In those other circumstances, the House would surely think again. Is that not a very sensible way of proceeding?

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 February 2011
Reference
523 c900
House
House of Commons

No, they are saying that the person is not guilty, according to the criminal law. As happens very often in employment law, an acquittal will not exempt the individual from appropriate proceedings under employment legislation and the contract of their employment, because the standard of proof is lower, as everyone...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c52-3
House
House of Commons

There are a lot of new clauses and new schedules in this group, but on this occasion I have a better explanation for that than is often the case, and it is as follows. The Committee will recall—in technicolour—how important it was for us to reach agreement before the summer...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c48-9
House
House of Commons

May I thank all right hon. and hon. Members who have contributed to this important debate. I hope that its conclusion on Report will be provisions in the Parliamentary Standards Act as amended that will ensure that the new system of parliamentary pay, allowances and pensions command the respect of...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c79-80
House
House of Commons

Point taken. One of the amendments would remove the sunset clause, which I never wanted in the first place, so I am delighted to recommend it. I do not think that that will require further amendment.

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c57
House
House of Commons

I have had the benefit of being in the Chamber for the whole debate and I do not think that there has been any personal criticism of members of the Fees Office. Everybody understands that a system that was not fit for purpose developed and that officials in the Fees...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c81
House
House of Commons

Non-taxable?

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c75
House
House of Commons

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c65
House
House of Commons

I will not invite you to declare an interest from the Chair in this matter, Mr. Gale, although I could. The provision is perfectly innocent. There is one class of Member—we are all elected as Members of Parliament. However, as the hon. Gentleman will recognise, some time ago the House...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c67
House
House of Commons

No part of the new clause states that there is a first class of Member, which is Labour and Conservative Members, a second class of Scottish and Welsh nationalists and anybody else, and then a third class, well below the salt, of Liberal Democrats. Attractive though that may be, it...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c67
House
House of Commons

The role of the parliamentary commissioner is to enforce the various codes—Standing Orders—that the House has established to deal with, for example, declarations of interest. That is the most obvious example, but included in that would also be examples of advocacy in the House—cases where somebody has been taking money...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c49-50
House
House of Commons

It is subject to any advice that we get from those at the Table, but the responsibilities of the John Lyon figure and the Standards and Privileges Committee are entirely a matter for the House, full stop. These changes do not deal with that. What is in the tin will...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c50
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c47
House
House of Commons

Colleagues will know—it is a well-trodden path—that if someone was convicted of a serious offence, they would normally come within the automatic disqualification. Let us say that the penalty imposed by the criminal courts was less than the 12 months in prison that would require automatic disqualification. Let us say...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c52
House
House of Commons

I did not do badly. The right hon. Gentleman used to represent Ealing; that is the problem.

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c51
House
House of Commons